No, Windows Live Mail is on first, Windows Live Hotmail is on second …

May 7, 2007 at 12:24 pm PT

Tagged with: Digital Daily Live, Linux, Microsoft, Novell, open source, Red Hat, Suse, Ubuntu, Web 2.0, Windows Live Hotmail, Windows Live Mail

comments so far. Add yours.

http://foolswisdom.com/ Lloyd Budd

Live? There is some related irony in your own court John, two recent Digital Daily’s are titled “Digital Daily Live: …”

“Distribution, distribution, distribution!”, aka “developers” screams Microft CEO Steve Ballmer. Linux already has the developers, good on Dell for partnering with Novell to get the awesome SUSE Linux distributed!

8% for Web 2.0 small? That is a huge percentage to me. Sir Tim Berners-Lee does now what Web 2.0 is and what is not, he is an idealist and web was always supposed to be “2.0″ and more.
wolfgang schaechter

This is the second time I've been severely disappointed in Mossberg reviews! Windows Live Mail, version 14, which is current is an inflexible disaster.
- The pale interface is awful, difficult to read and lacks icons
- Customization is nearly worthless giving few options
- Folder arrangement is oriented toward separate accounts and moving the store folders up is useless — they revert to the bottom next time you open WLM.

Those neat gimmicks of including pictures, which Kathy thought was so great — in 2007 — are nice but the basic mail functions are simply awful – coming to WML from 15 years with OE.
The prior bummer was Walt raving about the Palm Treo when the software was pedestrian, the organizer functions weak, and a simple backup required an after-market add-on.

But you are all still good folks, discovering fabulously useful things like CrossLoop, YouSendIt, and other stuff
16 mar 2010