John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

Facebook for $6 Billion? … Only if Zuckerberg Agrees to Be Implanted With a Livestock-Monitoring Microchip

So former analyst Henry Blodget says Microsoft is rumored to be planning to buy Facebook for $6 billion. An intriguing rumor. Bunch of suits from Redmond, Wash., flying down to Silicon Valley carrying Timbuk2 bags overflowing with cash for a smokin’-hot social-networking outfit with appalling ad click-throughs.

That’s right–appalling ad click-throughs. “Facebook’s members appear indifferent even to movie advertising aimed at their demographic,” Nick Denton noted in Valleywag earlier this year. “Click-through rates, the percentage of time users click on an ad, average 0.04%–just 400 clicks in every 1m views–according to one report seen by Valleywag.”

And he wasn’t the only one. “Word on the street, Madison Avenue that is, is that advertisers who have experimented and bought ads on Facebook are universally disappointed with the results,” GigaOm’s Bob Young wrote in February. “Consequently, getting these big brands to come back to the table and pony up again with significant ad-buys is going to be very difficult. In other words, Facebook is looking at a foggy fiscal future, and needs to make some tough decisions.”

Like, say … selling itself to Microsoft. That’s what Blodget says. “No, of course we can’t confirm it,” he writes. “But it makes sense, don’t you think? Steve Ballmer, desperate and furious, sick of sucking wind in the Internet game, sick of losing every Internet in-play company and much of the future to You Know Who, sick of feeling like a has-been also-ran, raiding the bank account and snapping up the hottest company on earth. The fly in the ointment: $6 billion’s a nice fat number, but it’s only 1/25th of Google’s valuation, and the Facebook folks clearly think they’re worth more than that. So maybe Steve will have to throw in another $5 or $10. Or $20. Or maybe Mark Zuckerberg will just tell him to go … home.”

Certainly could happen. Or Microsoft could tell Zuckerberg to do the same. After all, it wouldn’t be the first time. In early 2006, Microsoft was rumored to have passed on Facebook, amused that the company had valued itself at $2 billion or so and incredulous that founder Mark Zuckerberg couldn’t make it out of bed for an 8 a.m. conference call to talk to Microsoft execs:

During one series of talks with Microsoft, Facebook executives told their Microsoft peers they couldn’t do an 8 a.m. conference call because the company’s 22-year-old founder and chief executive, Harvard dropout Mark Zuckerberg, wouldn’t be awake, says a person familiar with the talks. Microsoft executives were incredulous.”

Anyway, if Microsoft truly is considering shelling out that kind of cash for Facebook, I hope it’s got a clever plan to boost the site’s ad click-throughs. Six billion dollars is a hell of a lot of money to hand to someone who can’t always be bothered to take your phone calls.


Twitter’s Tanking

December 30, 2013 at 6:49 am PT

2013 Was a Good Year for Chromebooks

December 29, 2013 at 2:12 pm PT

BlackBerry Pulls Latest Twitter for BB10 Update

December 29, 2013 at 5:58 am PT

Apple CEO Tim Cook Made $4.25 Million This Year

December 28, 2013 at 12:05 pm PT

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

The problem with the Billionaire Savior phase of the newspaper collapse has always been that billionaires don’t tend to like the kind of authority-questioning journalism that upsets the status quo.

— Ryan Chittum, writing in the Columbia Journalism Review about the promise of Pierre Omidyar’s new media venture with Glenn Greenwald