John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

Hey, You're the Ones Who Said It Was Up to Us …

itsuptoyou.gif
Depending on which side of the music industry you sit, the pay-what-you-like pricing plan under which Radiohead chose to release its new album, “In Rainbows,” is either another not-quite-killing blow to established music-industry business models or an ill-conceived, money-losing gimmick.

According to research outfit comScore, about 1.2 million people visited Radiohead’s “In Rainbows” Web site during the first 29 days of October and many of them chose to download the album. But only 38% were willing to pay for it. Of those, about 17% paid between a penny and $4; 12% paid between $8 and $12; 6% paid between $4.01 and $8; and 4% paid between $12 and $20.

In the end, the average amount paid for “In Rainbows” under the band’s “honesty box” pricing policy was roughly $2.26 per download.

“The stories to date about the ‘In Rainbows’ pick-your-price download offer have been much more optimistic,” said Fred Wilson, managing partner of Union Square Ventures. “I paid $5 and had no reluctance whatsoever to take out my card and pay. It’s a fantastic record, the best thing they’ve done in years. This shows pretty conclusively that the majority of music consumers feel that digital recorded music should be free and is not worth paying for. That’s a large group that can’t be ignored and its time to come up with new business models to serve the freeloader market.”

That’s certainly one way of looking at it. But there’s another as well: 38% of listeners who could have downloaded the album for free paid for it instead. And that’s something, isn’t it?

Twitter’s Tanking

December 30, 2013 at 6:49 am PT

2013 Was a Good Year for Chromebooks

December 29, 2013 at 2:12 pm PT

BlackBerry Pulls Latest Twitter for BB10 Update

December 29, 2013 at 5:58 am PT

Apple CEO Tim Cook Made $4.25 Million This Year

December 28, 2013 at 12:05 pm PT

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Nobody was excited about paying top dollar for a movie about WikiLeaks. A film about the origins of Pets.com would have done better.

— Gitesh Pandya of BoxOfficeGuru.com comments on the dreadful opening weekend box office numbers for “The Fifth Estate.”