Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer’s Full Memo to the Troops About New Reorg

Here is the full memo Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer sent out to the troops about the big changes in its organization, including the departure of Platforms and Services Division President Kevin Johnson, in which he addresses Apple, Yahoo, Google and more:

From: Steve Ballmer
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:30 PM
To: Microsoft–All Employees
Subject: FY09 Strategic Update

With FY08 complete, I want to discuss my priorities for the year ahead and share my thoughts about the key strategic topics that are on everybody’s mind, including Windows, competition with Apple and Google, our software plus services strategy, and Yahoo.

I also have news about an organizational change and a transition in our Senior Leadership Team.

First, I want to thank you for your hard work and the dedication you showed during the past 12 months. FY08 was a milestone year. Our revenue jumped $9.3 billion to more than $60 billion. Operating profit grew 21 percent to $22.5 billion.

These outstanding numbers are the direct result of your commitment to the priorities I outlined last July. A lot has happened since then, but our fundamental strengths, challenges, and strategic goals remain largely the same. Therefore, my priorities are consistent with last year. In FY09 we must continue to:

1. Invest in the right opportunities;

2. Expand our presence with Windows, Office, and developers;

3. Drive end user excitement for our products;

4. Embrace software plus services; and

5. Focus on employee excellence.

By focusing on these five areas, we can continue to grow revenue, increase profit, and expand our market share. These priorities are also critical as we work to address key issues surrounding our business in the coming year:

· Windows: The success of Windows is our number one job. With SP1 and the work we’ve done with PC manufacturers and our software ecosystem, we’ve addressed device and application compatibility issues in Windows Vista. Now it’s time to tell our story. In the weeks ahead, we’ll launch a campaign to address any lingering doubts our customers may have about Windows Vista. And later this year, you’ll see a more comprehensive effort to redefine the meaning and value of Windows for our customers.

We also have to drive developers to create rich applications for Windows. With Internet Explorer and Silverlight, we have great tools for creating applications that run everywhere. But we also need to make sure developers have the .NET skills to write unique Windows applications using Windows Presentation Foundation. To keep today’s Windows applications alive, vibrant, and exciting, we need both—applications that run everywhere and rich client applications.

· Apple: In the competition between PCs and Macs, we outsell Apple 30-to-1. But there is no doubt that Apple is thriving. Why? Because they are good at providing an experience that is narrow but complete, while our commitment to choice often comes with some compromises to the end-to-end experience. Today, we’re changing the way we work with hardware vendors to ensure that we can provide complete experiences with absolutely no compromises. We’ll do the same with phones—providing choice as we work to create great end-to-end experiences.

· Business and enterprise: Our enterprise and server business has never been stronger—today we are on the verge of becoming the number one enterprise software company. We need to continue to push on all fronts—mail with Exchange, business intelligence with PerformancePoint, virtualization with Hyper-V, and databases with SQL Server. We have to drive our enterprise search capabilities, our unified communications solutions, and our collaboration technologies. And we must continue to compete against Linux in key workloads such as Web servers and high performance computing.

· Software plus services: Some people think software plus services is all about search. But it’s really about changing the way software is written and deployed. The future is about having a platform in the cloud and delivering applications across PCs, phones, TVs, and other devices, at work and in the home. It’s also about driving change in business models through advertising, subscriptions, and online transactions. Software plus services is a huge opportunity for us to deliver new value on the desktop and the server to all of our customers. This year at PDC, you’ll hear more about our cloud platform initiatives and the next versions of our Live and Online technologies.

· Google: We continue to compete with Google on two fronts—in the enterprise, where we lead; and in search, where we trail. In search, our technology has come a long way in a very short time and it’s an area where we’ll continue to invest to be a market leader. Why? Because search is the key to unlocking the enormous market opportunities in advertising, and it is an area that is ripe for innovation. In the coming years, we’ll make progress against Google in search first by upping the ante in R&D through organic innovation and strategic acquisitions. Second, we will out-innovate Google in key areas—we’re already seeing this in our maps and news search. Third, we are going to reinvent the search category through user experience and business model innovation. We’ll introduce new approaches that move beyond a white page with 10 blue links to provide customers with a customized view of their world. This is a long-term battle for our company—and it’s one we’ll continue to fight with persistence and tenacity.

· Yahoo: Related to Google and our search strategy are the discussions we had with Yahoo. I want to emphasize the point I’ve been making all along—Yahoo was a tactic, not a strategy. We want to accelerate our share of search queries and create a bigger pool of advertisers, and Yahoo would have helped us get there faster. But we will get there with or without Yahoo. We have the right people, we’ve made incredible progress in our technology, and we’ll continue to make smart investments that will enable us to build an industry-leading business.

As I mentioned earlier, I have important organizational news. Today we are announcing that the Platforms and Services Division will be split into two businesses: Windows/Windows Live and Online Services. We are also announcing that Kevin Johnson will leave the company. He will work to ensure a smooth transition.

Since 1992, Kevin has been a key contributor to many of this company’s most important achievements. As president of the Platforms and Services Division, Kevin has built an incredibly talented organization and laid the foundation for the future success of Windows and our Online Services Business. Over the last 16 years, through everything from his work as head of the company’s worldwide sales, marketing, and services efforts, to his leadership in transforming our field operations and repositioning the company to focus on opportunities in emerging markets, Kevin has played a vital role in this company’s success. There is no doubt that his passion and dedication will be missed.

Effective immediately, Steven Sinofsky, Jon DeVaan, and Bill Veghte will report directly to me to lead Windows/Windows Live. In the Online Services Business, we will create a new senior leadership position and conduct a search that will span internal and external candidates. In the meantime, Satya Nadella will continue to lead Microsoft’s search, ad platform, and MSN engineering efforts, and Brian McAndrews will continue to lead the Advertiser and Publisher Solutions Group. Both Windows/Windows Live and the Online Services Business are led by a strong group of executives on the technical and business side who have the talent and experience to address the challenges we face and drive the next generation of growth and success.

Looking ahead, I see an incredibly bright future for our company. As I said at the June 27th Town Hall for Bill, we are the best in the world at doing software and nobody should be confused about this. It doesn’t mean that we can’t improve, but nobody is better than we are. Nobody works harder than we do. Nobody is more tenacious than we are. We’re investing more broadly and more seriously than anybody else. Our opportunities to change the world have never been greater.

I look forward to working with all of you as we focus on our five priorities in FY09.

Steve


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://allthingsd.com/ Alan Sanders

    This dude is seriously deluded. When’s the last time you remember any “end user excitement” about a Microsoft product? If Steve Balmer actually believes that Microsoft makes the best software in the world, he’s in the wrong business.

  • Allen Cross

    No doubt Jim Jones was giving similar speeches, in the days before he and his followers decamped for Guyana. And I’d bet he was equally certain that his expressed vision for the group was obvious & reasonable. But he was every bit as mistaken.

  • zato Gibson

    “Our opportunities to change the world have never been greater.”
    God help us.

  • Matt Moog

    For all the bashing Microsoft takes from the tech purist crowd, any reasonable person has to see $22 billion in sales on $60 billion in revenue and have a very large amount of respect for the power, influence and success of the company. Look back over the last 15 years and you will see that their persistence has served them well in the os, desktop applications, enterprise (network, database, mail etc) and now mobile. They have the persistence and resources to get the web right.

  • Mike Clever

    “Looking ahead, I see an incredibly bright future for our company. As I said at the June 27th Town Hall for Bill, we are the best in the world at doing software and nobody should be confused about this. It doesn’t mean that we can’t improve, but nobody is better than we are. Nobody works harder than we do. Nobody is more tenacious than we are. We’re investing more broadly and more seriously than anybody else. Our opportunities to change the world have never been greater.”

    Dear Steve! How often you believe you are you? One time a year? My god what a message!

  • http://www.ranware.com Richard Nichols

    After getting screwed and ignored by microsoft one time too many I’ve said good bye and moved my personal and development equipment to Apple.

    I have one Toshiba laptop (running Ubuntu) left and will kill it off as soon as the rumored new macbook pro’s come out.

    So, when microsoft repays me and everyone else who trusted them and bought Vista Ultimate only to be screwed out of an ‘extra’ $200 we didn’t need to pay then maybe I’ll care.

    Or when a high quality software development environment is included with each copy of windows maybe I’ll care.

    Until then, byte me steve ballmer.

  • Dale Strauss

    I appreciate that Mr. Ballmer is speaking to the troops in that email, and not the consuming/business public. It is also enlightening to read his analysis of Apple’s success, which as a latecomer to that platform (March 2008) I agree with his assessment. After a continuous struggle with Microsoft OS developments since a 1986 Toshiba 1100+ (DOS 2.xx), I took the plunge and enjoy the end-to-end success called MacBook.

    I realize that Microsoft can’t duplicate that experience given the current manufacturer landscape, and in fact even “customizing” for each major manufacturer will lead to a return to the early 80′s balkanization of the PC industry. However, a baseline has to be drawn by Microsoft – set ironclad hardware standards for a solid base version of their OS – and then let manufacturers customize form their. For example, NO PC that will use even the basic flavor of Vista should be released without 2gb ram, discreet 256mb video, 200gb hd, and TimeMachine quality backup software for an external HD.

    Step 2 – continue to leverage your incredible lead in the Backoffice, and expand connectivity, yes, opening Activesync truly enhanced Apple’s position, but it also solidifies Microsoft’s position against RIM in the enterprise market. In that same sphere, increase connectivity options to Exchange Server.

    Regardless, I have seen in only three short months the incredible value of and integrated end-to-end solution, and I’ll be staying here until that changes.

  • Nils Tishauser

    I am a mac user myself, but you have to respect the power Microsoft wields in the tech industry. Also not all their services are bad. The exchange servers e.g. are indispensible for a lot of company’s and for good reason.

  • Jimmy Johansson

    Fake a “leaked” email…cunning!

  • http://www.cyclelogicpress.com Neil Anderson

    The complete experience with Apple and its Unix operating system is topnotch. New features included in Leopard, such as TimeMachine for automated backup, are a joy to use. Apple’s integration and ease-of-use hasn’t been achieved by anyone else.

  • http://blog.macb.net Mac Beach

    Notice how dependent he still is on that word “innovation”, something the company isn’t really known for.

    To me, every time he uses the word it just draws my attention to the fact that they don’t do it.

  • http://dhdeans.blogspot.com David H Deans

    “…we’ll launch a campaign to address any lingering doubts our customers may have about Windows Vista”

    If Mr. Ballmer believes that it’s true there is “end user excitement for our products,” then why is it necessary to launch a PR campaign — in an attempt to change people’s minds about the shortcomings in Vista?

    Microsoft’s stock price reflects an acknowledgment of the denial and delusion that’s apparent is these contradictory statements.

  • Logical Thoughts

    First off i’ll admit that Mac systems always appealed to me due to my interest in 3D

    modeling and animation. Around 2000 or so when i first got serious with that hobby,

    Mac’s were the preffered platform. But the only systems that really exceled in that

    area cost twice as much as a windows based platform, lacked easy upgrading and in my

    expierence were pretty much of a hassle in any other area with a serious lack in

    performance.

    Why is ballmer is launching a #300 million campaign for Vista…the sad truth being

    that the majority of consumers are morons that rely on sound bites, large fonts and

    stickers informing them of compatibility when deciding what to purchase. This should

    be evident given how long Intel got away with churning out Netburst cpu’s.

    MS did set a baseline hardware req for the entry level vista flavor, Home or basic or

    Vista Home basic, whatever it’s called. As i was actually given a pre-release copy of

    Vista ultimate in december of 06 (it was available only through the Microsoft

    employee store in redmond) i can read the minimum hardware requirments quite clearly

    which say

    CERTAIN PRODUCT FEATURES ARE NOT AVAILABLE WITH MINIMUM SUPPORTED REQUIREMENTS

    800 mhz 32bit cpu 512mb ram 20 gig hard disk with 15gig free Support for super VGA

    graphics and CD-rom.

    Well gee… i wonder what customer base that hardware is geared towards. Did all you people buying your $499 off the shelf “Vista ready” computers think that somewhere along the way DX10 got nicknamed SuperVGA? Was the vista upgrade advisor that was floating around 6 months before the OS was actually released somehow confusing? The performance index perhaps? But then maybe some people actually looked at the reccomended requirements

    Reccomended system requirements

    1 Ghz 32bit or 64bit cpu, 1 gig RAM, 40gig hard drive with at least 15gig free

    Support for DX9 graphics with WDDM driver, 128 MB graphics memory MINIMUM, pixel

    shader 2.0 in hardware, 32 bits per pixel, audio output and internet access

    Ah yes…Vista introduces Pixel shader 4.0, but surely the 128mb Pixel shader 2.0 is meant for high performance stuff, right, especially paired with that 40gig hard drive, hey, the OS takes up near half that, and any cutting edge games would take up another 8-10 gigs. But i can understand the frustration felt by those paying a price for an entire computer that is 1/2 -1/3 the cost of some Graphics cards and CPU’s sold on their own.

    Really…research what you’re buying, or shut up and just learn your lesson.

    Will vista run on those given hardware specs? Yes it will, i’ve run vista on a 32bit 2.ghz AMD athlon with 1gig of memory and a ATI 9800 gpu, it runs slow, it doesn’t let you turn all the eye candy on…but then again XP ran slow compared to a 64bit single core.

    In fact my media center PC that i built a couple months ago runs 64bit vista ultimate perfectly fine on with

    2.3ghz 4400×2,($45)
    Gigabyte 780G motherboard ($70)
    2×1 gigs of 800mhz value DDR2 ram.($40)
    Total ============== $155 ($169 with shipping)

    Runs Aero graphics, plays Blu-ray video flawlessly with just the on board gpu, and i decided to build my father a low power bussiness system using the same board and cpu but bumping the memory up to 2x2gig (which added an extra $60 for 2x80gig SATA II disks in RAID 1 and $95 for 2×250 gig SATA II disks in RAID 1) So just over $350 with the additional cost of 4 hard disk and 2 extra gigs of memory.

    Vista has better security, networking, file indexing, hardware monitoring, data protection and software/driver update support than XP. Shadow copies allow for quick revovery if hard disks fail…and unlike XP loading restore points work everytime. Oh yes…and it’s FASTER, marginally in 32 bit vista, substantially in 64bit vista. (running 64bit vista on AMD cpu’s has given me a consistent 15-20% performance gain in the OS, and 15%-25% performance gain in 64bit applications. The ONLY piece of software i’ve encountered a problem running in 64bit vista is Adobe flash player in 64bit internet explorer, which is moot since you can use 32bit IE in 64bit vista.

    Server 2003, Vista and Server 2008 are all based on the longhorn source code. Incredibly, most who have reason to run Server 2003/2008 put pair their 64bit hardware with 64bit OS’s. Once again, i repeat the majority of consumers are morons.

    Aside from that, what does the $300 million Ad campaign for vista have to do with end user excitement in MS products? Is anyone actually under the delusion that Windows is the only piece of software MS developes? Regardless of which windows OS is used, near every single computer has Microsoft office of some flavor installed. Than there is

    SQL server
    Exchange Server
    Visual foxPro
    Visual Basic
    Visual C++
    Visual c#
    Visual Studio
    .Net Framework
    Asp.net
    Dynamics
    DirectX
    Internet explore
    Windows media Center
    Xbox
    Windows Live!
    Virtual PC

    You know…little things. Like the software that is used to create the vast majority of games, applications, operating systems and Web page content.

    Vista was supposed to be exclusively 64bit, but since peoplle are afraid of change, the uptake was slower then expected and they went with a 32bit version as well. I hate Xp now, and while i love 64bit vista, 32bit vista is garbage and especially when those buying new systems, with 64bit hardware there is no reason for the 32bit version to be used.

    But to put it in perspective for you all. The first 32bit CPU was the 386, which came out in…1986. The first operating systems actually based on a 32bit kernel using 32bit applictions were NT 3.1 and windows 95.

  • Ed Tidwell

    Sorry Logical Thoughts

    I couldn’t resist adding to your list of software some interesting points.

    SQL server — purchased from Sybase and it really only works with MS Server now.

    Exchange Server — Biggest security threat to Internet

    Visual foxPro — purchased

    Visual Basic — MS gets a gold star here. Borland beat them with Delphi though and MS never got close to how much better Borland’s product became.

    Visual C++ — another gold star for MS. 6.0 was a great dev tool

    Visual c# — paid around 2 million to get Borland’s R&D manager and Anders. Two key people responsible for developing a Java clone. It was very well done but only runs on MS OS so what is the point?

    Visual Studio
    .Net Framework
    Asp.net
    Dynamics
    DirectX — MS has split this API so that most game companies just port to xBox. MS has helped kill the Windows OS as a gaming platform over xBox.

    Internet explore — Paid for Spry Mosaic. Moved the application team into the OS group. Best thing ever for FireFox.

    Windows media Center
    Xbox
    Windows Live!
    Virtual PC — MS again following another companies lead for dollars.

    MS paid it’s way into the market from day one by buying DOS.

    They have very smart developers who have written some great things.

    Management has forced them to hack on top of a hack. Jobs had the courage to DELETE the old OS and replace it with Darwin. MS has no technical vision and their direction is only focused on companies making lots of money.

    What does Google have to do with a desktop computer? Why doesn’t MS focus on fixing THEIR stuff instead of chasing yet another revenue stream?

    The secret to Apple is THEY have learned how to partner and folks still trust them. Adobe is still around after being their killer application.

    The DOS killer application was Lotus. Where did they go and who killed them? ;-)

    Everyone is tired of MS and the spin. They don’t have anyone at a high level who gives power to smart guys in the code.

    Gates would always allow a developer to do an end run and IF the developer was right Gates would SUPPORT THEM. MS has too many bean counters and not enough managers with technical vision.

    Ironically, the very company they use to make fun of in their early years (IBM), they have now become.

  • http://www.gfsignals.com/ Forex Signals

    The speech is quite impressive, lots of emotions, but not many real facts. Just expectations… But I mostly agree with him about the good future of the company.

  • http://www.devicedriverupdate.net/ driver update

    very informative article. Thanks a lot for sharing.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Entrepreneurs need to be reminded that it’s not the job of their customers to know what they don’t. In other words, your customers have a tough enough time doing their jobs.

— Mark Cuban’s 2011 book “How to Win at the Sport of Business: If I Can Do It, You Can Do It”