John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski


Last go round as whole departments and projects were cut, some of the most skilled staffers in areas like interactive design, product management and program management were let go. In other words, you could be top talent on a project, but if that project was cut, honey, you were toast. Why would this go-round be any different? Since Yahoo is cutting by the numbers, we have to assume they’re going to let some of the strongest people go again, perhaps to try to (quietly) later rehire, as also happened last time. So think about it–when those self-satisfied announcements go out, about the ‘deep cuts and the bright future that lies ahead,’ those left without jobs in a deepening recession right before Christmas will have the comfort of knowing they weren’t let go because they were the bottom 10%, they were let go because their managers failed to convince their bosses that those projects were ones that mattered. And since the big bosses didn’t know most of those people, great talent was let go, while deadwood remained (and remained.)”

Former Yahoo employee Susan Mernit says there’s no reason to think this round of company layoffs will be any different from the last round.

Twitter’s Tanking

December 30, 2013 at 6:49 am PT

2013 Was a Good Year for Chromebooks

December 29, 2013 at 2:12 pm PT

BlackBerry Pulls Latest Twitter for BB10 Update

December 29, 2013 at 5:58 am PT

Apple CEO Tim Cook Made $4.25 Million This Year

December 28, 2013 at 12:05 pm PT

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

I think the NSA has a job to do and we need the NSA. But as (physicist) Robert Oppenheimer said, “When you see something that is technically sweet, you go ahead and do it and argue about what to do about it only after you’ve had your technical success. That is the way it was with the atomic bomb.”

— Phil Zimmerman, PGP inventor and Silent Circle co-founder, in an interview with Om Malik