Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Mark Cuban Weighs In on Yahoo (aka, a Jerry Yang Nightmare)

BoomTown, who never met a Yahoo story I didn’t like to write up, is handing over the stage today to hyperactive entrepreneur Mark Cuban, who just weighed in on what Yahoo should do.

Literally, his post yesterday on his Blog Maverick site is titled “What Yahoo Should Do,” and he lays waste to a lot of the conventional wisdom about the Internet portal’s fate.

Cuban and Yahoo have a rocky history. Yahoo bought his company, Broadcast.com, in the Web 1.0 boom in 1999 for $5.7 billion in stock, which Cuban promptly sold at the peak.

Since then, he’s used the billions he garnered to conduct the longest-running I-told-you-so in the digital industry, including being on the alternate board when Carl Icahn was waging a proxy fight against Yahoo (YHOO) earlier this year.

(Full disclosure: Cuban has recently also gotten into a tussle with the SEC recently.)

Let’s just say, Yahoo CEO Jerry Yang is not a fan. Ironically, in the piece, Cuban seems to be a big fan of Yahoo, or–more precisely–of its potential.

First, Cuban discounts any purchase of Yahoo’s search business by Microsoft (MSFT)–sorry, Carl. And not because Yahoo does not want to sell, but because he thinks the software giant will not waste its cash horde, as it gears up to fight Google (GOOG).

“Why anyone thinks that Microsoft is stupid enough to give up what amounts to most, if not all of their liquidity is beyond me. Particularly when their net current assets have now fallen a little below Google’s. Between liquid assets and borrowing capacity, both have about the same amount of ‘powder’ in place in the event ‘the next big thing’ appears on the radar. I doubt either wants to be at a disadvantage to the other when it comes to potential opportunities.”

Next, calling Yahoo’s directors and large shareholders the “Huggy Bear contingent,” after that classic cliché of a character on the “Starsky & Hutch” television show, he advises against “trying to dress up Yahoo in order to pimp it out to any bidder it can find.”

Instead, in a very clear strategic explanation, Cuban advises that Yahoo become an aggressive buyer of traffic, services, content and monetization.

Given so much is on sale at a huge discount, Cuban posits that Yahoo should make 20 or more acquisitions in the next 18 months:

“Yahoo should be on the warpath, vetting each and every media (yes, media) and technology company it can sit down with looking for bargains.

“It should be taking Yahoo stock and finding every and any accretive investment in the Internet and media space that it possibly can. Some may argue that Yahoo stock is too cheap to use for acquisitions. I beg to differ. The speculation around a potential Microsoft acquisition, along with a very strong balance sheet has propped up its stock. Compared to private and public would be targets, Yahoo stock is amazingly strong currency.”

I like Cuban’s moxie–I always do–especially given he seems to be able to articulate a clear vision in his piece of what Yahoo could be, much better than its leadership.

“Yahoo has the opportunity to be the ultimate next generation media company,” write Cuban, quite correctly. “It just has to stop being afraid of its own shadow.”

Amen to that.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • bill brout

    Mark Cuban seems to have been savvy enough to do at least one thing right in his life(creating and selling his money losing Broadcast.com and hedging the YHOO stock sales).That said, he’s been given a platform to opine on just about anything. I’m not aware of ANY publicly available information that would indicate he’s made any meaningful returns in the aggregate on capital employed. I’d love to hear about his numbers,annualized and audited.

  • http://blog.macb.net Mac Beach

    Yahoo was built, during its mid-life (in Internet years) on acquiring technologies and monetizing them.

    Problem is that starting with overpriced acquisition of Broadcast.com and the failure to acquire the underpriced (hindsight etc.) Google, combined with numerous smaller deals where useful (to some) products were bought, then abandoned. Finally, simple infrastructure products such as e-mail were allowed to stagnate, not for months, but for years after better alternatives came along (both Google and Microsoft).

    The old saying about shooting yourself in the foot would come in handy here, except you’d have to substitute a machine gun.

    Problem is that technology long ago became unimportant to those running the company (and some are no doubt blissfully ignorant of it). It’s amazing how soon you lose your job skills once you no longer have to work for a living.

  • Robert Freeman

    yahoo has not been relevant for years. when is the last time anyone went there for anything except to play games? its the biggest fraud on the net.

  • http://www.garibim.net erdem ela

    It was delightful to see Bill and Steve sharing a stage and reminiscing about their stuff, but I was surprised that Bill (gadgets) and Steve (widgets) didn’t settle the debate about the original inventor of the widget.

    One can never have too many widgets. Somebody codes something you never even dreamed of wanting – suddenly everybody

    lig tv izle
    bedava ligtv izle
    garibim
    deyimler
    ?iir türleriçetchatsohbet needs a whole bunch of widgets because they don’t impinge too much on the screen/template real estate.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

The joke now is what’s the first tech company that we acquire. I hear AOL’s going pretty cheap.

— – David Karp, founder of Tumblr, to the Guardian’s Josh Halliday