Twelve Twittering Men?

We here at the Law Blog have been called for jury duty several times (in New York City, it feels like an annual event), but have never been picked to sit. It’s probably a good thing, because, despite our legal training and basic understanding of how trials work, we’d find it excruciating to not be able to use Google (GOOG) to do our own research on issues that arise in the case.

So we’re a bit sympathetic to those jurors who are mucking up cases all over the country by researching, iPhoning, Blackberrying, Twittering–what have you–during trials despite prohibitions against such activities. Click here for today’s story on the situation, from the NYT’s John Schwartz.

The lead anecdote in Schwartz’s story is particularly evocative: Last week, a juror in a federal drug trial in Florida admitted to the judge that he had been doing research on the case on the Internet. So the judge questioned the rest of the jury only to find that eight other jurors had been doing the same thing.

Read the rest of this post


comments so far. Add yours.

About Voices

This is a section of the AllThingsD Web site featuring posts that have been curated from around the Web: pieces we’ve read, discussions we’ve followed, stuff we like. Five posts are included here each weekday, but only the headline and the first two sentences. We link to the original site for the rest. The section is explicitly labeled, so it’s clear that content comes “from other Web sites.”

We also solicit original full-length posts and accept some unsolicited submissions. Voices is edited by Beth Callaghan.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »