John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

Internet Archive Announces Everybody-Against-Google Coalition

googAs the Google Book Search Settlement nears a Sept. 4 deadline for rights-holders to opt out of the deal, some powerful interests are allying to oppose it.

Rallied by the Internet Archive and veteran Silicon Valley antitrust lawyer Gary Reback, Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), Yahoo (YHOO), the Special Libraries Association, the New York Library Association and the American Society of Journalists and Authors are forming a coalition called the Open Book Alliance. Its purpose: To make the case to an already concerned Justice Department that the $125 million settlement–which will allow Google to digitize some 18 million books–is an anticompetitive restructuring of the book industry and one that could give Google a monopoly on the largest digital library of books in the world.

And it might. There are some who claim the plan grants Google (GOOG) a blanket license on millions of so-called orphan books, works still in copyright but whose copyright owners are unknown.

But Google insists the deal is nonexclusive and says other companies are free to pursue their own agreements with the publishing industry. The company further notes that its efforts will not only restore access to some 10 million out-of-print books that are still under copyright, but provide their authors with a new means of profiting from them. The deal is beneficial, Google contends, to consumers and to the publishing industry.

And to Google as well, because there is always a profit motive to the company’s altruism.

That said, Google does have a point here. Restoring access to millions of books that are today unavailable in any medium is a worthy goal. So is enabling their authors and publishers to once again make a bit of money from them. Is there a better option for the publishing industry at this moment? Allow those works to lie fallow and unmonetized?

[Image Credit: Forrester Magazine]


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://blog.macb.net Mac Beach

    “Out of print” is an anachronism, and needs to be made more so.

    Like the rotting celluloid tapes in Hollywood vaults we are at a critical crossover point where this stuff either gets scanned, or becomes unavailable to anyone.

    At this point anyone who doesn’t like Google’s approach should be challenged to provide a viable alternative.

    Microsoft already dipped their toe in the water and then ran home to mommy, Yahoo has done nothing that I recall, and the Internet Archive, Project Gutenberg, etc. are all well meaning projects, but moving at a glacial pace.

    Surely no one thinks that Amazon’s motives are pure. So far all they have done was purchase Mobipocket in order to put their efforts to a halt.

    I read the linked articles and found mentions of objections, but no details on what the actual objections were. Isn’t the worst that can happen that someone who’s work still has commercial value but it out of print might be made aware of the fact? They are getting nothing now, but could be getting something in the future. Sounds like a win-win to me!

    Meanwhile a few people with interests in philanthropy (and the ego boost that goes along with it) are being surpassed by a (gasp) organization with commercial interests.

    Sounds like sour grapes to me.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

@digiphile @jayrosen_nyu that’s just silly. Closing a global business in reaction to single-issue national politics is foolish.

— Dick Costolo, via Twitter, in response to a tweet by Alex Howard wondering whether Twitter would participate in Wikipedia’s Jan. 18 SOPA blackout