Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Maybe Googlers Eat Their Own Dog Food, but Will It Be Tasty to Anyone Else?

Please see this disclosure related to me and Google.

LOLCat_Unimpressed

Leave it to Google to compare its most aggressive new product to date with one that often includes meat by-products, bone meal, brewer’s rice, corn syrup and–yum!–“dried animal digest.”

But that’s exactly how the Silicon Valley search giant chose to describe its new Nexus One smartphone in a blog post Saturday.

As in eat its own product! Get it?

Titled: “An Android dogfood diet for the holidays,” the post reads, in part:

At Google, we are constantly experimenting with new products and technologies, and often ask employees to test these products for quick feedback and suggestions for improvements in a process we call dogfooding (from “eating your own dogfood”). Well, this holiday season, we are taking dogfooding to a new level.

We recently came up with the concept of a mobile lab, which is a device that combines innovative hardware from a partner with software that runs on Android to experiment with new mobile features and capabilities, and we shared this device with Google employees across the globe.

While Google (GOOG) did not cite the phone by name in its online missive, a number of sources told BoomTown that the sleek-looking, brown-gray touchscreen device was given to employees at the company’s weekly all-hands meeting Friday afternoon at the Googleplex HQ in Mountain View, Calif., and across the world, ensconced in a white box with the name right on the top.

While the bajillions of Google employees given their early holiday gift were told not to tweet about it or share any information, that’s precisely what they soon did, declaring it delicious.

The Twitter feed, so to speak, that ensued quickly got noticed by the blogosphere–first on Friday night by TechCrunch, which also first wrote about the “Google Phone” last month. (The Wall Street Journal followed up with the name of the phone and other details on Saturday.)

And that is exactly what Google execs meant to happen, of course, by slowly unleashing the Nexus One on the public.

Why? Well, so as to test the waters, presumably, after finding a somewhat tepid reception, so far, from big wireless carriers that might provide service for it.

alpo

Google has, of course, talked to them all, because its plan to market the phone depends on cooperation and not disputation with the big telcos.

So far, no one but T-Mobile–the U.S. subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom (DT) that already sells four phones using Google’s Android operating system software–has taken the kibble to be part of a new way of selling mobile devices that the search joint will be trying, according to MediaMemo.

As Peter Kafka wrote:

“But, for sure, Google doesn’t intend to sell its new ‘Nexus One’ phone the typical way, sources familiar with the company’s plans say. Instead, it envisions a scenario where customers who buy the handset on a separate Web site are provided with a list of carriers from which they can make a selection menu-style.”

Google needs cooperation here, because most phones are sold “locked,” which means they work only on the carriers you buy them from. (Sort of like making you join a forced march, but with dropped calls.)

Thus, Google is also trying to create a phone so tasty that consumers demand that wireless networks provide it to them, unlocked and with competitive bidding for service.

That prospect is probably not so yummy to the telcos, because they still mostly operate like Soviet ministries, except they’re not nearly as flexible.

The question is: If Google is successful in forcing the wireless giants from their practice of handing over whatever thin gruel they choose to dish up to consumers, will it result in better phones for all?

Or will Google’s experiment be just that and result in another innovative but failed attempt to change the woeful cell system in the U.S., ending up as another Android phone that still lags behind the Apple (AAPL) iPhone?

We’ll all soon see, but not yet, according to Google, which also coined the disturbing term, “dogfooding,” in its hey-everyone-look-at-me-but-don’t-see blog post.

“Unfortunately, because dogfooding is a process exclusively for Google employees, we cannot share specific product details. We hope to share more after our dogfood diet.”

My dog, Cosmo, is waiting expectantly by his empty bowl.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://BestSellerAuthors.com Warren Whitlock

    The DogPhone 1.0 may not be the unlocked phone that changes everything.. but I’m saying to the Soviet Telcos that lock phone: “Tear this wall down”

  • http://codingrelic.geekhold.com DGentry

    '… according to Google, which also coined the disturbing term, “dogfooding,” in its hey-everyone-look-at-me-but-don’t-see blog post.'

    To be fair, the term 'eating your own dogfood' has been around for longer than Google has. I recall it from the early 1990s at Sun in relation to Solaris on the desktop displacing Windows and SunOS 4.x, and the term didn't originate at Sun.

    Its best not to think about the ramifications of the terminology.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000526906710 facebook-100000526906710

    Google is moving down in the stack to challenge B2C opponents with an open architecture and new sets of standards. In creating a post-revenue business model, Google can only manage success if consumers accept a co-branding and outsourced manufactured device … NQ Logic recommends reading about the rest of the new Google's mobile strategy at http://www.nqlogic.com

  • edw3rd

    Imagine if Google expanded their unlocked, Nexus One sampling efforts at Mobile World Congress where the global Operator community and partners gather in early February. Eric Schmidt is keynoting. Could be a heck of a launch party.

  • heirbrande

    Although I think the Android is a superb platform and would help garner in an era of mobile computing (out of the technical dark-ages, (finally), the reality is big shifts like this take a long time. Also, what kind of fallout would occur if all of a sudden the telcos are not competing and creating a consimer's market. Things like this need to be carefully thought out, research done and negotiated.

    Concentrating so, so much control in one giant cannot be all that good in my opinion for the consumer. Also on another fornt, look what happened to our finacial system and look what almost happened to Fannie Mae and Freedie Mac. If there were three or four Google's then this would be ok, but I think Google's already got it's lion's share of the dog food and need to start letting some of the other puppies in on the food before they just get tired of running (ore shrivel up and die from starvation). I do salute Google for bing very very innovative. No one can doubt that they have been. They just need help with the people skills by 'playing well alongside others' and trying not to make enemies, like they taught us in grade school. I think they're just coming to realize that Google is not the darling puppy everyone used to be so enamored with but is turning into a big -ole barking dog with a growl. Just don't get them made and hope it's not a bulldog (no offense to bulldog owners– Iwas bit by one as a child. Scary.)
    I sure hope Google doesn't turn into another Microsoft, though they've beng trying to give back to society lately come to think of it.

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    But there *are* three or four Googles: Microsoft, Amazon, Rackspace, and even Apple, to name a few companies you have heard of that have more servers than you can shake a stick at. Then there are all the CDNs whose names we don't even know.

    I agree that big, almost by definition is bad. But we have sadly created a system where only big companies can even participate, let alone thrive. Until that *system* is changed, all we can do is root for the big companies that don't suck all the oxygen out of the room for smaller participants. Google's openness in this regard puts them in the category of “least bad” for me. So far anyway.

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    I don't even think the new word “dogfooding” is the invention of Google, but I'm to lazy to look for prior use.

  • bushworlda

    Mbt shoes have a positive effect on the entire body. Mbt Chapa, Mbt m walk are just $87.

  • samharrison

    google is cramming their iphone wanna-be down employees' throats because nobody else wants it… gagphone is a better term for it

    that's the problem working at google, not only do you have to wear the nike's, drink the kool aid, now you have to gag on their 2nd-rate phone

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    Funny, I haven't heard of any Googlers complaining about this horrible imposition. Have you?

    Quite a bit different than MS employees being given Zunes and told to throw away their iPods, or having Balmer pretend to stomp on an employee's iPhone.

    If you've heard of any similar strong-arm tactics being used by Google I'm sure Kara and friends would love to follow up. Link please.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=634676836 Ian Cornett

    I've been working at a major software company for over 10 years now, and I can tell you that we used the term dogfooding prior to my arrival. Google isn't innovating the term, not so much on the phone front either, if you've looked at the bug reports on android, a lot of features are being fixed with subsequent releases, but as for being “open source” all of your drivers have to have platform signatures… So much for open source giving you the access to create new implementations…

  • http://www.five-fingers-vibram.org/ five fingers shoes

    Great topic, they are more attractive than others, i appreciated it, thanks.

  • http://www.five-fingers-vibram.org/ five fingers shoes

    Thanks for your great work.
    really really good stuff men !!! thanks !!!
    Interesting Article. Hoping that you will continue posting an article having a useful information. Thanks a lot!

  • qiaokl

    It merit your while to the MBT shoes clearance at the checkout line in your grocery keep and you discern, time and again, headlines wrapper the theme.
    Whether they are customers or internal advocates of MBT shoes sale, having experts to help drive and participate in conversations is imperative to having a successful community.
    The MBT shoes discontinued, the Dell KACE appliances have paid for themselves many times over – they make managing the IT infrastructure easier, while the team can concentrate on delivering more value to the business.
    So wearing a pair of MBT women's shoes can have a firming effect on the buttock, abdominal and leg muscles.
    It's very comfortable to wear, making a great walking shoe. MBT shoes for women also appealing because of their stylish look.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JEUPUPU55BZHPGHXQZMJ7GZIME Fred Zhang

    fight the project

  • http://www.hondagenerator.info Honda Generator

    hahah funny..

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

The joke now is what’s the first tech company that we acquire. I hear AOL’s going pretty cheap.

— – David Karp, founder of Tumblr, to the Guardian’s Josh Halliday