Walt Mossberg

First Impressions of the New Apple iPad

It’s about the software, stupid. While all sorts of commentators were focusing on how much Apple’s new $499 iPad tablet computer looks like an oversized iPhone, the key to whether it can be the first multi-function tablet to win wide public acceptance probably lies in whether consumers perceive it as a suitable replacement for a laptop in key scenarios. And that, in my view, depends heavily on the software and services that flow through its handsome little body.

I have only spent a short time hands-on with the iPad–too short to fully run it through its paces and formally review it yet. But, after attending the rollout of the new device today, and trying out some of its features for myself, I have some first impressions.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs positioned the iPad as belonging to a new category of device between the smartphone and the laptop (since the netbook, in his view and mine, is really just a small, cheap laptop). But, as the demos unfolded, I kept thinking it was more like a hybrid of the two. 

It uses the iPhone’s basic user interface and physical design. But, taking advantage of a 9.7″ screen and a fast Apple-designed processor, the iPad adds some user interface elements and functionality that aren’t available–or at least typical–on smart phones, but look more like computer software. For instance, its photo program works more like iPhoto on a Mac than the photo app on an iPhone, and it will be available with a touch version of Apple’s iWork productivity suite, which is Apple’s take on Microsoft Office. This is a much more powerful program than the phone-based office suites for the iPhone or BlackBerry, and Apple (AAPL) is only charging $30 for it.

Also, Apple has rewritten most of the core iPhone apps so they look more like, and have more of the features of, Mac or PC programs. But they aren’t mere clones of full computer apps. For instance, many forego standard menus for clever overlays and sidebars that work more naturally with the iPad’s multi-touch interface. Other app developers can do this, too. But, even if they don’t, the company said the iPad will run most of the current 140,000 iPhone apps, either in a small window on the screen, or in a full-screen mode. That’s a huge plus for a new device.

Mr. Jobs said after the onstage program ended that he sees the iPad’s user interface as a fuller expression of the one on the iPhone, which had been limited by screen real estate.

And, although the reported video and music streaming services were nowhere to be seen at this preview, Mr. Jobs did offer a taste of how the iPad could deliver content, beyond simply downloads from the iTunes store. He showed off a new e-book reader app with built-in online book store that, visually at least, blew away the Amazon (AMZN) Kindle, even if it seemed to lack all of the Kindle’s features and may have a smaller catalog. Representatives of the New York Times (NYT) showed an iPad digital version of their newspaper that seemed vastly more usable than the clumsy version now on the Kindle and its ilk.

So, the iPad is more than just a giant iPod Touch or iPhone, even though it looks like one. But the question is, will that be enough to get consumers to shell out for it, and make it part of their daily lives? Or will it be a niche product, like Microsoft’s (MSFT) Tablet PC or Mr. Jobs’ own Apple TV?

On the plus side, the device is handsome, feels comfortable and solid to hold, and has all that beautiful software built in. Oh, and it’s amazingly low-priced for an Apple product, with that modest $499 price tag for a base version with 16 gigabytes of memory and Wi-Fi, but no cell phone data connectivity. (A fully loaded model with 64 gigabytes, Wi-Fi and a no-contract 3G cellular data plan is $829, and there are variations in between.)

It also boasts a decent 10 hours of battery life, and Mr, Jobs told me after the event that, for some functions, like playing video and music, the battery should last even longer. 

But there are minuses. First, since it’s too big to go in a pocket, people might perceive it as just another thing to carry around, despite the fact that it’s only a half inch thick and weighs just 1.5 pounds. It also lacks a common and popular laptop feature–a web cam. So, it can’t be used for video chats or for the creation of web videos.

Steve Jobs behind the iPad's virtual keyboard.

Also, the carrier for the iPad’s 3G plan is the deeply unpopular AT&T–there were groans and boos among Mr. Jobs’ otherwise excited audience when this was announced. AT&T is offering bargain prices for iPad data service compared to what it charges laptop owners. But its network is overwhelmed in many big cities and many iPhone lovers, who are strong candidates to buy an iPad, curse the carrier daily.

Finally, while it’s too early for me to say without lots of testing, the size of the iPad’s virtual keyboard may be a liability. I found it almost too wide for thumb typing, and a colleague who’s a whiz at touch typing and tried it briefly found it awkward to type on. Apple is offering an auxiliary physical keyboard that docks with, and charges, the iPad. But you won’t want to lug that around.

Still, the software looked impressive, and that could help Steve Jobs do the one thing even he has never done in an amazing career: get the public to love not just a better version of an existing type of gadget, but a whole new category of gadget.

iPad Event Slideshow

1 of 33  Back  Next
Steve Jobs introduces the new iPad.

Steve Jobs introduces the new iPad.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    Aside from the lack of camera, which I think we can expected in the 2nd generation i[ad – this looks like a winner to me. I use my Kindle because it beats carrying books and trying to read a newspaper on a packed airplane. The ipad fixes what I don’t like about the Kindle plus some. Sign me up.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Guanxis-Sin/1332187429 Guanxis Sin

    How iPad can benefit entrepreneurs – http://blog.testjumper.com/201.....d-for.html

  • Anonymous

    cdma simply seems to work better in dense locations. i have a sprint phone which allows me to choose between GSM (when i travel abroad) or CDMA when i’m home. GSM is nearly useless to me in NYC, no signal where i live, no signal where i work but CDMA works perfectly in both locations. I should add that i live a block from a GSM cell… a device like IPad is physically big enough to accomodate both radio technologies (my sprint phone is no bigger than an IPod Touch)

  • http://www.qualitypoint.blogspot.com/ QualityPoint Technologies
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1196412716 Nancy Miller

    How is the search function on the iPad? I own an iPod Touch and the search is beyond inferior. I don't understand how a company of Apple's caliber could blow something so fundamental. I would love to know if the iPad has improved on search. Thanks.

  • retroblue

    Remember this is flash memory, not HDD.

    Of all the things people seem to have taken for granted, the fact that the iPad turns on instantly and all apps open instantly is a really big deal.

    16GB Dell Mini-9 SSD is around $70, and off-the-shelf 64GB SSD is going to set you back over $200. Then there's the caveat that no OS to make the most of flash storage better than iPhone OS… they still operate with scratch disks and clumsy file systems (which people are adept at cluttering up over time).

  • retroblue

    There are elements in the 3.2 SDK (which is exclusively for iPad, not iPhone) which mention a camera, so I guess it was pulled pretty late in the day.

    The same is widely believed to have happened with the lastest generation of iPod Touch. If the touch gets a camera in June, then I guess we can expect one in iPad 2.0 next year.

    Personally I blame the roll-out mentality: Hold off on key features to get buyers to dig into their pockets again later on.

  • davebarnes
  • davebarnes
  • Gogo001

    http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/scenario

    The plural of the ENGLISH word scenario is scenarios.

  • live2travel

    Everyone seems so surprised at the lack of a camera. Obviously Apple is just trying to placate AT&T by giving them another year to get their lame network in order enough to handle millions of people videoconferencing.

  • Anonymous

    Walt,

    Excitingly, the iPad has sensory feel and touch, can speak, sing, listen, has remembrance, friendly, etc., but without a camera it is as blind as a bat. I just cannot believe they’re going to let this gadget fly out the door without the ability to “see.” Thunk! Having a camera would make it much more appealing, generate millions more sales, allow richer communication between people, many more types of apps can be created, etc. Also, even though it has multiple maps of the world and can triangulate, it is a mediocre guide without a full-blown GPS chip. Like a bat without echo-location. Perhaps, this first iteration should be called the blind “iBad.” So much potential, so much disappointment.

  • streever

    Still incorrect. You should learn to read more carefully. Click the discuss button on the link you sent, and you'll see that scenarios is the proper usage for most applications.

  • Anonymous

    I Like not love the iPad v1.0

    What’s really exciting is the potential of the iPad for textbooks, 21st century newspapers (with multiple pictures/video, flashing headlines?), magazines. Imagine carrying around all your subscriptions, revision material in a 1.5 pound device.

    If the publishing industry get on the iPad wagon and apple adds a webcam, trust me to be in line for v2.0!

  • robertjakobson

    Call me arrogant but You can not read with this device more than one hour or so because of the backlight, it is not an e-ink device and does not suit the reading experience well.

  • Anonymous

    I would like to know how the iPads Address book can interact with a CarDAV Server and if its Calendar can interact with a CalDAV server – do you know?

  • Anonymous

    its not just the software thats crap…walt

  • Patmania

    I happen to spend many hours on my laptop and I find Apple do well at tempering the light with surrounding lights.
    I don't think this would be an issue, but let's wait and see…

  • mualexander

    ..apparently you've never played the vast majority of games or tried to accomplish anything that requires more than the most rudimentary of gestures — yes, some interactions can be simplified to a gesture of a finger or two, but many (most) are much more productive with a more efficient input mechanism (touch interfaces in these cases can often be more of a gimmick / trick / work around).

    For the case of doing anything serious (which I would expect to be the case on something larger than the phone), touch can be a nice enhancement to another input mechanism, but it is in addition to something that doesn't require me to obscure a large portion of the screen while I interact with it or something that I can use while holding a phone or something else in my other hand. Not to mention folk with fingers too big for how an iphone records touches or other accessibility issues…

  • http://herot.typepad.com/ Christopher Herot

    Some questions come to mind:
    -Where are all the magazine publishers and TV networks we would have expected at the launch?
    -Will the screen be bright enough to read at the beach?
    -Will the battery last 10 hours when Walt gives it his “torture test?”
    -Will AT&T’s network be able to handle all the video?
    -In this economy, how many people have >$1000 (when you include a few years of AT&T) to spend on something that won’t make phone calls and doesn’t run the software you can run on your PC or Mac.

    More thoughts at http://herot.typepad.com/chero.....means.html

  • retroblue

    Intelligent point.

  • Anonymous

    Personally, I think it looks like a winner. I can easily see having a WiFi version on the side table next to our couch to futz around with (web surf, play solitaire, check email) during TV commercials (and sitting through such exciting programs as “What not to Wear” that my wife likes to watch).

    I await answers to the following questions:

    1) How does the iPad compare with a Kindle when reading a book outdoors?
    2) In order to freely use AT&T’s WiFi hotspots (Starbucks, Barnes & Noble, McDonalds, etc.), do you need to buy the 3G model?
    3) How does it print (a necessity with iWork apps, I would think)?
    4) Will Apple roll out a complete “cloud” service to remove the need to own a traditional computer? The iPad seems perfect for some folks that would never own a computer, but in its current form, you need a computer running iTunes with which to sync it with. Apple needs to remove that requirement, allowing content to reside in the cloud and having it sync with the cloud.

    On another note, guess how much digital picture frames are selling for. Answer: Between $90 and $225. When charging, the iPad can “sleep” in a digital picture frame mode. Pretty slick.

  • johnmeister

    This is why you have to rely on a standard like Websters or OED — instead of an open-source site like wiktionary where anyone could add or edit an entry.

    Scenarios is plural of scenario in ENGLISH. Scenarii is plural if you are speaking ITALIAN.

  • Anonymous

    Why do people love netbooks even though they are smaller laptops ? For one reason – they are looking for complete laptop experience in a smaller and smarter device. Netbook hasn’t done the best job in providing this experience, but has left a much bigger room to improvise upon.

    This is where I expected Ipad to fill the spot by doing following:

    1) Lightweight, yet powerful to compete with netbooks. – Ipad does a great job at this.

    2) Multitasking – It’s not a computer if it can’t multitask

    3) Rich web experience – It’s not sufficient if there isn’t a flash player. Ipad fails this test as well.

    4) Freedom – Netbooks provide the same freedom a macbook provides. Install the apps from internet.
    Can i run ESPN360 on ipad ? No way. Can I install my office VPN service ? Nope.
    While App store provides safer apps, it also takes away the freedom to do what you want to do on your computer. By end of the day call it Ipad or whatever, people need a smarter computer.

  • Anonymous

    If Apple could put the basic iPad model at 499, why can’t they lower the price of the iPhone, to, say, 300? Surely the iPad costs more to produce.

  • Anonymous

    Actually what seems to be missing in the discussion and something I pointed out in my own blog is the “personal” vs. “collaborative” differences between Netbooks and the Tablet. A laptop / netbook form factor is fine when I’m working or doing something by myself. If I want to browse the web in conjunction with collaborative TV viewing or watch a movie on a plane with my kids that form factor fails everytime (saying nothing about the laptop form factor getting crushed by the reclining seat in front of me). The Tablet is about casual users looking for active or passive entertainment. The laptop is about productivity and focus.

  • Gary C

    they could have limited the cam use over 3g. i can see plenty of people using it through wifi, or using a photobooth like app for the device. my little siblings go nuts for that. easy entertainment while cooking dinner or the like.

  • Anonymous

    Why not get the wi-fi only version? You could then get a Verizon Mi-Fi and use that wherever you lugged the iPad since the Mi-Fi can fit into your pocket?

  • Anonymous

    I think the biggest draw for users will be the ebooks on the iBook store. The availability of useful apps (appstore) that are best enjoyed in large screen format, will work well for the iPad. And of course, “the best browsing experience” as Mr. Jobs puts it.
    –Brian Pereira (Exec Editor, InformationWeek, India)
    http://techwow.wordpress.com

  • Anonymous

    Curious about Walt’s final comment. Is the ipad really a “whole new category”? I mean it’s hardly the first tablet to be released, although it certainly is the most beautiful. I would argue that the tablet is right in line with the iphone and ipod in that it’s a better version of an existing product class, not a new class in and of itself.

  • grega

    It's not necessarily simply a choice of buying something you had no intention of owning before.

    If you were in the market for a 15″ MacBook Pro – you now have a choice of
    a) 15″ MacBook Pro, OR
    b) 22″ iMac + iPad
    Maybe that pricing is not a coincidence. But it makes me wonder about what I'll do when I replace my 15″ MBP.

  • Anonymous

    That’s simply not true. E-book readers aren’t a new product, and people have been reading books on the web since people started putting their own stories up there.

    You may be surprised to hear that not everyone “scans” through articles. Some of us read them. Perhaps if you did the same, you’d be have a better idea of what the web has been used for this past 15 years.

  • Anonymous

    “Horses for courses” comes to mind. I don’t think iPad is a replacement for Netbooks. Actually I think Steve Jobs completely undersold, even mis-sold, iPad.For one thing, you need another computer to sync with. As such it’s an appliance – which is probably what the original thinking behind this and iPhone was in the first place (look up Jef Raskin, and Information Appliance). There are apps for iPhone for remote desktop activities and storage management, and I’m sure we’ll see more scope to iPad apps as creative developers come up with ways to make it do the things they’re familiar with on their desktop computers.Obviously the lack of multi-tasking means different approaches, but you can never underestimate creativity – and that No Multitasking rule has a few benefits, not least being battery life. I can see a lot of non-book-reading types being quite happy with the alluded 140 hours of music playtime. And how often do Windows users complain at all the bloatware in new purchases, and mystery background processes which leave them unsure of what is *really* going on in their PC? Security is one of the greatest strengths of the iPhone/iPad OS. By not allowing multi-tasking, you’re greatly improving the chance that nothing malicious is going to spoil your users’ experience (I’d draw your attention to Rick Astley’s re-popularisation through jailbroken iPhone trojans).

  • Anonymous

    Perhaps he was being cautious, but I think Walt actually fell short of the mark. What iPad will do is reveal a new category of user.It’s not as if they weren’t already there, they’ve just never been noticed before – much like the Nintendo Wii discovered gamers in the living room. The parallels are surprising – if you look back at the news when the Wii (and DS too) was announced, Nintendo were hailed by some and ridiculed by many. I was working in a very large game studio at the time, and while the designers thought Wii was a stroke of genius, everyone else thought it was a joke. “Why in god’s name would you have a controller that looks like a TV remote?”, and “Who needs two screens?” (regarding DS).Look who’s laughing now.Apple have stepped outside the box, and as with all containers, there’s always more opportunity for growth outside than there is in.But yep, iPad, iPod Touch, iPhone, they’re all the same class, and nothing wrong with that. After all; how many laptops do Dell sell?

  • Anonymous

    Good point this: bluetooth keyboards. Every current generation iMac user ALREADY has one lying about the house/office. These people, and all other bluetooth keyboard owners will not need the keyboard-dock-combo. Another barrier less daunting than it may first appear.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=686090872 Anonymous

    Yep, classic case of features getting higher priority than necessity. Lack of multitasking is, quite frankly, noob.

    Haha … touch screen better for everything except typing? So it’s better for 10% of usual tasks?

    Since it is an American product and more Americans will buy it, makes me wonder if the screen is grease proof? Oily McDonald’s fingers will quickly “fog” that screen up.

    NetBooks are far more versatile than this and don’t restrict you to the hip thing that is “Apple Only”.

    This product counts as bling . . . sure it’s pretty, but it’s sole purpose is like that of smoking in the 50s… it looks cool.

    Having said all that, the processor does seem pretty impressive, but it could really be put to better use.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eitan-Schwarz/100000487434193 Eitan Schwarz

    Parental full presence is the absolute key and that means face-toface, eye-to-eye time. NO distractions.

  • Anonymous

    I have to believe that they will create a user sizable keyboard for the iPad. I too thought it looked way too big and took up too much real estate on the screen and looked too hard to type on (than it needs to be or should be). I fly on my iPhone and I expect with a sizable keypad and a little practice I will on this as well.

    I for one will be getting one right away. If the iPhone is any example, developers will be creating apps that will make this a must have for road warriors who are tied of lugging a 5 pound laptop around.

  • Anonymous

    Because they are still selling like hotcakes. Why should they. If Kindle didn’t exist you can bet the iPad would be more like $899 for the intro model.

  • http://cityhues.com/ Cityhues

    I would agree, but for me, the price point is low enough that I'll certainly acquire one.

  • Anonymous

    Actually. It will make calls out of the box without 3G…it’s called Skype and it works amazingly well. When the iPad gets a front facing camera it will be game over. Jetson’s here we come. Tons of families will have one in the kitchen to video conference with friends and relatives.

  • Anonymous

    I think you have it partly right. Sure it could have more. But the price hurtle was more important than adding a camera. A year from now it will have one and in that years time tons of apps will have been created and people will see just how amazing it could be.

    However where I think you are wrong is that most people using an iPad will also be a smart phone user and have all the things you just mentioned as limitations in their phone already. Camera, GPS, NAV, Calls… I for one will be much more likely to whip out my iPhone than my iPad to to all the things you mentioned above.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t know about “arrogant”, but other words I’m too polite to say come to mind:
    I along with most knowledge workers read on a backlit computer screen (LED/LCD) 8 to 15 hours a day. Of course one can use the iPad for reading. The only place it will suffer is under direct sunlight. If you spend every day at the beach and do your reading there, don’t buy one.

  • Anonymous

    Its true: Amazon has not yet figured out how to do newspapers well on Kindle. Thats there “Achillesferse”. If iPad can do a better job and it probably will, then this will be a huge selling point as soon as 3G is embedded.

  • http://herot.typepad.com/ Christopher Herot

    But to function like a phone it will need to receive as well as make calls. But if iPad doesn’t multitask or Skype suport Push Notification then someone will have to call you on your real phone to tell you to start up Skype. I’m sure they will fix that as well, but in the meantime I’ll run Skype on a real computer.

  • Anonymous

    +1 for the iPad use during my wife’s “What not to Wear” program.

    Probably would be my main use of a product like that.

  • http://cityhues.com/ Cityhues – Jeff C

    I would anticipate a plethora of 3rd party applications to roll-out for the iPad over the next few months.

    To be effective, I believe iPhone apps, will need to be re-engineered for the iPad exclusively.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=32400067 Daniel Lee

    @Walter – One benefit you forgot to mention of having a camera build into the device is the recent introduction of AR or Augmented Reality (i.e. new Yelp features where holding up the device can show you where restaurants are located and how they’re rated). With such a large screen real estate, what could be done with AR is limited only by the imagination.

  • Anonymous

    A question I have is: how about privacy/multi-user? You don’t log on to the iPad, right? So it’s only for me unlike the MBP I’m typing this on which can be used -without mixing up mail, files, photos et cet- by everyone in the family. Surely in that sense the iPad is more of a shared device? Not?

  • http://www.webremote.de/ os

    Small steps are good steps. Apple learned this lesson.

    Today for me it´s the perfect photoframe with some nice extra accessories. ;-)

    Tomorrow a great synth… with mail checking ability.

    And what´s best: It´s evolves every day. What a fun!

Microsoft Gives Windows a Clean Sweep

May 15, 2012 at 6:01 pm PT

Are Macs More Secure?

May 01, 2012 at 9:25 pm PT

Taking Dictation

April 24, 2012 at 2:47 pm PT

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Arguing online is like wearing a sharkskin vest. You look like a jerk.

— Anil Dash, in Businessweek’s How To issue