Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

PBS's "Frontline" Considers the "Digital Nation"–A Lot of Handwringing Over the Inevitable, but Watch It Anyway

Earlier this week, the reliably erudite PBS public affairs program, “Frontline,” aired a documentary called “Digital Nation,” which I caught on television in one of the rare moments I find myself actually in front of one.

Produced by Rachel Dretzin, in collaboration with tech author and pundit Douglas Rushkoff, it’s the second in a series–the first, which aired in 2008, was titled “Growing Up Online”–about how the inevitable digital onslaught is affecting everyone.

As the site for the show describes itself, in part:

Over a single generation, the Web and digital media have remade nearly every aspect of modern culture, transforming the way we work, learn and connect in ways that we’re only beginning to understand…Dretzin and her team report from the front lines of digital culture–from love affairs blossoming in virtual worlds, to the thoroughly wired classrooms of the future, to military bases where the Air Force is fighting a new form of digital warfare. Along the way, they begin to map the critical ways that technology is transforming us–and what we may be learning about ourselves in the process.

And, indeed, Dretzin and her team race hither and yon interviewing a pile of smart folks–most of whom, thankfully, are not from Silicon Valley–to uncover what’s up with this Internet thing, which the kids seem to love.

There are ruminations on the out-of-focus students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the evils of multitasking, fretting over how this digital submersion is affecting the brains of schoolchildren and more jaw-dropping over the creepily compelling oddness of virtual worlds and online relationships.

Dretzin even features and–natch!–clucks over her own computer-savvy children and what it all means to them. She plays the role of the less-plugged-in mother, complete with a furrowed brow about it all, although the kids are obviously sharp as tacks, digital French flashcards or not.

This egads-no-one-know-where-this-geekery-is-taking-us worrywartness is probably appropriate, and though nothing new, is well told.

Perhaps the best part is a visit to the spanking new gaming-heavy center the Army has built that sucks in teen boys like nobody’s business.

While the piece has aired, you still can watch the whole thing on the well done Digital Nation Web site, the best part of which is the contributions of regular people who added their own voices to the digital conversation.

Which is remarkably robust, as far as I can tell, so perhaps we have not gone to hell in a cloud-computing handbasket quite yet.

Here are two of the more adorkable of those videos:

Here is the whole “Digital Nation” doc, in nine chapters:

Distracted by Everything

What’s It Doing to Their Brains

South Korea’s Gaming Craze

Teaching With Technology

The Dumbest Generation?

Relationships

Virtual Worlds

Can Virtual Experiences Change Us?

Where Are We Headed?


comments so far. Add yours.

  • samharrison

    who knew that attention deficit was actually a skill that we all need. Face it, how many of you *really* read tweets? nobody but the sorry ADD interns who get hired to tweet for their PR hacks

  • http://twitter.com/emerigent/lists/memberships Emeri Gent [Em]

    There are three things that I are my personal affirmations from relating to “Digital Nation” :

    1. Context
    2. Attention
    3. Benefactors

    How we view something new and something we know or think we know is radically different. My context for “Digital Nation” was irrevocably changed when I got a book called “On McLuhan – Forward Through the Rearview Mirror” edited by Paul Benedetti and Nancy DeHart. Benedetti and DeHart distilled McLuhan to both a visually graphic and coherent form

    http://www.flipkart.com/forwar.....vie…

    That one book changes the way I view the Frontline documentary.

    Secondly I think the detractors of attention deficit don't know what they are talking about, the biggest single problem today isn't ADD (because ADD is a mindset not a disorder), it is attention surplus and overload. A person with ADD simply has to adjust to the way of the majority mindset, but everybody can decide the quality and quantity of their attention. The irony is that it takes attention to point this out, when the cure is reduce attention, cut off choices (which is central to decision making anyway) and adjusting to one's own inner calling, a calling that benefits humankind, not one that is destructive to it.

    Thirdly the renaissance cultural movement of the 14th Century was fueled by benefactors. There was no way Michelangelo would contort his body in discomfort for days on end to paint the Sistine Chapel without the patronage of Pope Julius II. We have benefactors today and they support public television. The reality as I see it is that the money these benefactors spend today on or in pursuit of quality media, makes “Digital Nation” a superb channel to invite a revival of renaissance in our century. The relationship between the application of digital media and public radio and television should ideally be the central axis point to engage such a renaissance.

    The BBC is just as necessary in this evolution as PBS or NPR in this regard, one just has to click on quality programming like “Chaos” to know why – and it would be such a shame to see quality programming be walled in as opposed to a global sense of shared education:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEpZFEIDHdc

    I don't want the responsibility to do the thinking for other people, but the “Digital Nation” isn't a thoughtless environment, and it is up to each of us how we paint the canvas of our own destiny. The irony is that “Digital Nation” today is becoming increasingly a virtual version of the industrial age, where people migrated to cities, except today the migration is called following. I think the containerization of cities is no different to the containerization of virtual media. Whether the term “Global Village” is deemed a positive or a negative for future generations depends very much (I think) on getting context and attention aligned with progressive realities and benefactors supporting a new future of great possibility, maybe not a New Athens but certainly a revival of 21st Century type renaissance.

    I don't want others to agree with me, if I am on a mindless or self-defeating path of development or awareness, I will be the first to know. Even then I will gain the option to figure out if Steven Pressfield is on the money with his views on resistance:

    http://home.stevenpressfield.com/books/war_art.asp

    [Em]

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Knowledge for my generation was at the center of the human quest. It is going the way of the recording industry. It is a term that won’t survive the generation.

— David Weinberger, researcher at Harvard’s Berkman Center for the Internet and Society, from a lecture last Wednesday at the University of California at Berkeley’s School of Information