Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

What's Worse Than iPad-Was-Coming Hype? Perhaps iPad-Is-DOA Hype or the IPad-Will-Save-Media Hype!

While a lot of the hype around the upcoming Apple iPad has thankfully died down, reaching its crescendo at the unveiling of the tablet device last month, the buzz of two kinds building now is perhaps worse.

The first meme has to do with a notion that the iPad is dead on arrival for a wide variety of reasons. No support for Flash video technology. No USB ports. An eye-tiring screen. Too pricey. Too much like a giant iPhone without the phone. No camera.

You get the idea.

What’s most interesting to me is that some people I talk to say the Apple (AAPL) device is just terrible to use, despite the fact that they have never even touched one.

When I note that I have, indeed, taken it for a very short spin and liked what I saw quickly, they always then ask me all about it as if I held the wisdom of the ages.

My stock answer: “Since you are not buying one, I will spare you the pain.”

While that’s annoying enough, perhaps worse are the ongoing paeans that the iPad will somehow be the savior of traditional publishers of all kinds, providing–finally!–the just-right medium to make their various and sundry media relevant in the digital age.

But, like Goldilocks, that’s just a fairy tale until the iPad is actually out in the wild and subject to consumer use when it begins to be rolled out in late March.

Because even if the iPad proves to be as good at displaying magazine and rich advertising as seems possible (see the pretty video of Wired magazine on the iPad above), it’s not going to be clear whether it’s a success until regular people are using it on the same scale as its sister devices, the iPod and the iPhone.

In addition, it seems as if media companies–in their quest to somehow escape the powerful clutches of search giant Google (GOOG) or Kindle-bearing Amazon (AMZN)–are rushing into Apple’s arms without making the obvious connection more strongly.

Which is to keep remembering that Apple and the music industry have fought viciously over pricing and control ever since the iPod and its progeny took over the market for all nonpirated sales of music.

With their hands on none of the key technology and innovation levers online–not devices, not search, not social networking or e-commerce relationships–media giants continue to be without even a pair sticks to rub together to make digital fire.

They tout their premium content, of course, as being critical to the Apple iPad’s success, but it’s not at all clear it will turn out that way.

That’s why I cringed when I read the last lines from a piece by media writer David Carr of the New York Times, even before the iPad launch, titled, “A Savior in the Form of a Tablet”:

“I haven’t been this excited about buying something since I was 8 years old and sent away for the tiny seahorses I saw advertised in the back of a comic book. Come to think of it, the purchase didn’t really meet my expectations, but with the whole new year thing, a boy can dream, right?”

I suppose he can, but digital dreams–like those seahorses–can sure die fast.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • tedcranmore

    While others say the fact “it's just a big iPod touch” is a negative, it really means we know very much how this device works and therefore makes it much easier to predict whether I'll like it or not. Since day one with my Touch I thought it was amazing, but I always wished it was bigger. The fact that applications can do more with the new form factor is just a bonus, I would have been wanting one simply for the bigger screen. Yes, I have safely predict my happiness with this device far more than I could guess my level of disappointment with the seahorses. I'd never had tiny seahorses before and simply desired bigger ones. The analogy really breaks down and I think this “just a big touch” perceived weakness of the iPad is actually it's greatest reason to predict success.

  • rrtzmd

    …very true…publishers don't seem to get it…almost everything published shows up somewhere on the internet within a day or or two of publication…unless they find a way to offer some additional value to owning a subscription, then they're unlikely to attract subscribers and advertisers…

  • chandrac1

    I think you're wrong about NYT's Carr and the iPad. That's a poor run rate. Carr's not bedazzled with unreal iPad expectations. He sees the downside risks. He knows that Apple did not create the iPad to save print publishing. That's not a viable biz model … backing a horse that's dropping legs faster than the time it takes to reach the finishing line. I mean that Print may be legless if it doesn't at least use the iPad, or anything, as an experiment before it passes into the big yawns phase of diminishing public interest. There's a saying in NLP: 'If what you're doing, isn't working, do something else. Hell, do ANYTHING else!! It couldn't be any worse guys, now could it?
    I think they've already delayed too long. I guess that, near the end, even the humble Dodo had a clue that the game was up and, due to circumstances beyond its control, it was simply ripe and ready only for…. extinction. This possibility is one that print folk must learn to recognise. They've allowed the cards to stack up in favour of that deadly outcome, sitting on their hands and shooting the breeze the while. There is no other outcome possible.
    Film is dead. Long live digital.
    Print is dying of a terminal condition.
    And they say 'Long live Print'?
    It's not sad. It's funny. Gun, meet foot. Aim. Shoot.
    Ipad is the start of a new era of fingertip computing. It will succeed for that reason. Everyone knows how to use a finger. I doubt they'll need more than a one page manual. It's a simple device that does everything most people want in a computer; does it extremely well and costs little.
    Everyone who ever shied away from computing will love it.
    A final thought. With every new product thread, Steve Jobs likened it to adding more legs to Apple's stool , giving it more corporate strength, depth and stability. Print publishers have spent the last 5 decades watching the legs of their stool fall away. How many legs remain?
    Chandra Coomaraswamy

  • JohnDoey

    Ironically, the thing that is delivering digital publishing into Apple's hands is Microsoft's ongoing sabotage of the Web. We used to make concepts like this for a future Web. But the Web is stuck at turn-of-the-century technology along with Internet Explorer and its users, where even IE8 is only up to 2003 at best. You can actually do this kind of thing in Apple's Web browser, but if you're only going to be viewable on Apple platforms, then you might as well get into App Store or iBookstore and have easier authoring and let Apple collect the money for you.

    Microsoft's idea was to sabotage the Web so that people would make Windows apps instead. But now people are making iPhone apps.

  • http://www.swift2.blogspot.com Swift2

    I love the way you are skeptical about all the various sides in this battle, Kara. Who knows what will be true.

  • http://www.swift2.blogspot.com Swift2

    Periodically, I think of how I felt about “readers” for years: how I like to sit in the living room and read away at a book. You do the work yourself. The book doesn't. The multimedia is in your cranium. If a friend loans you a book, it's not copy-protected. There's no policeman looking at you in the house to see if you really paid for that copy of Catcher in the Rye you decided to read to remember what it was like to read for the first time, to see if it was any good.

    You didn't keep your receipt at Classic's books in Montreal, so could the publisher fine you $10,000 — if it was digital, he could.

    If print is on the way out, is democracy, the Enlightenment, freedom and individuality? That's the medium they arrived with, because it meant that anyone could be learned if they figured out how to read the codes written on the paper. I'm just not sure some copy-protected art director's wet dream is such a big leap forward, and maybe it's backwards.

  • expatinasia

    Most people have ignored the fact that the iPad has an Apple-designed microprocessor, that is significantly faster than currently-available components. It is Apple's first step away from Intel, and is a harbinger. The same technology will be used in new iPhones…and computers. It's incredible that this advancement was virtually ignored.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

The joke now is what’s the first tech company that we acquire. I hear AOL’s going pretty cheap.

— – David Karp, founder of Tumblr, to the Guardian’s Josh Halliday