Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Microsoft Talking to Apple About Being a Search Option on the iPhone, Not Google Replacement

Correcting yet another too-early rumor, sources tell BoomTown that–as has been previously reported many times in many places–Microsoft and Apple are in long-term talks about adding the Bing search service as a prominent option on the iPhone and not as a replacement of Google.

Currently, Google (GOOG) is the default search on the popular mobile device, although you can easily go into its settings and switch the search option to Yahoo (YHOO). Few consumers do, though.

Microsoft (MSFT) has been angling to be added to the search options for a long time, but has wanted to do so in a way that makes the choice more visible.

And it is probably a good idea to give users of the iPhone more choice in a wide range of services.

But, whether Apple would make Microsoft’s Bing the default or whether it would simply allow iPhone users more of a choice among search services is unclear.

In addition, Microsoft wants to make its Bing mapping more integrated with the Apple (AAPL) iPhone.

“Being an option is what’s on the table,” said one source briefed on the talks. “That’s all for now, although who knows where it could lead?”

But, cautioned several sources, talks are not complete, even though the software giant is eager to be able to announce such a deal at Apple’s upcoming developers conference on June 7.

Microsoft execs have been nervous about completing such a deal, especially because Apple is notoriously secretive and is known to end talks due to leaks.

That said, relations between Apple and Google have become increasingly tense, as their product offerings–especially in the mobile arena–have become competitive.

Google was one of Apple’s principal partners on the iPhone upon its launch and its services are prominent on the device.

But, as the device has evolved, sources say Apple has been considering a number of search options, as well as mapping, for the iPhone.

Google execs have been anticipating this, of course, especially as the search giant has pushed development of its Android mobile operating system.

In fact, a recent developers conference that Google had in San Francisco, its top execs spent a lot of time publicly attacking Apple.

Thus, it is likely that its top-level placement on the iPhone and other Apple products will diminish.

While being an option is not the same as completely replacing Google, it would give Bing a well-known platform to show off its technology to consumers.

Microsoft would like to hip-check Google off of the iPhone, of course.

But like rumors that it would pay News Corp. (NWS) to “de-index” its content from Google and display it prominently on Bing, the notion is premature.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    Google Search has no peers in ad-hoc searches whether mobile or from a PC. What’s missing is the analytical searching that’s more a domain of Artificial Intelligence or its poor cousin, Business Intelligence. Google Search has its limits such as shopping by criteria. For example, how do I find the best place to buy my next new car? In this scenario Microsoft has the distinctive advantage of having its SQL Server Analytical Services. If Microsoft can turn this SQL Server AS around to face the public then Bing can deliver a public Analytical Services in solving many people’s problems using intelligence rather than simply matching character-based search criteria. Apple can certainly benefit in carrying a Bing app that can provide intelligent searches.

  • zato

    “especially because Apple is notoriously secretive and is known to end talks due to leaks”
    I guess All Things Digital (AKA All Things Worshipping Lord God King Microsoft) must want this deal killed!

  • David Thomson

    “Correcting yet another post-first-and-ask-questions-later rumor, sources tell BoomTown that–as has been previously reported many times–Microsoft and Apple are in long-term talks about adding the Bing search service as a prominent option on the iPhone and not as a replacement of Google.”

    Subbed = Arrington, you're a big fat moron.

  • http://pithagora.com fjpoblam

    No comment on the content. Kara: please learn to write. Your first sentence chokes of Bulwer-Lytton. Study Hemingway.

  • http://allthingsd.com/boomtown Kara Swisher

    Ok, I fixed it! Happy?

  • http://allthingsd.com/boomtown Kara Swisher

    Not so! He updated to saw it was more complex, and it is.

  • http://allthingsd.com/boomtown Kara Swisher

    I have no skin in this game. That's a well known fact about Apple in SV.

  • http://twitter.com/tdh004 tdh004

    Even if it's rumor, who would possibly “de-list” from any Search Engine. Especially Google.

    How much could Microsoft honestly pay somebody to make them even consider this. The amount of hits (i.e. revenue) gained from Google would have be pretty substantial.

  • leniamonio

    well

  • darlaj

    The imagined hatred among Google, Microsoft and Apple isn't quite as real and personal as people like to imagine. Google has excellent iPhone Apps including Search and so has Microsoft. Amazon has a mobile app for shopping (as distinguished from Kindle for iPhone/iPad) with One Click purchasing. Google can do its thing without Safari on Apple mobile devices. Google has no earthly reason to kill the iPhone. Every click from and iDevice is income for Google. Google offers value to Apple's users. Everybody wins. Bing will bring value to Apple customers. Microsoft brings value to Google and vice versa. The drama makes for good soap opera and blog hits (also more income for Google and Bing) but money is neutral and bloodless.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

I think going public today is almost like a Bataan death march. I think Wall Street — this will insult many people — but I think in many ways it bears a resemblance to organized crime. It is legal today what they do, but what they do is manifestly unfair.

— Roger McNamee of Elevation Partners, in conversation with Bloomberg Television’s Margaret Brennan