John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

Apple CEO Steve Jobs Live at D8: All We Want to Do is Make Better Products

Steve Jobs at D8Much has happened since Apple CEO Steve Jobs last appeared on the D stage. At that time, in May 2007, the iPhone had not yet arrived at market, the app ecosystem it would usher in was still gestating and the iPad was simply a long-running rumor.

So the conversation onstage focused largely on the iPod, iTunes and Apple’s (AAPL) relationship with the music industry, and the forthcoming launch of the iPhone. A few months earlier, Jobs had penned a widely read open letter, “Thoughts on Music,” calling on the “big four” music companies to sell their music without digital rights management. iTunes was already the world’s largest online music distribution system, so his thoughts generated quite a bit of discussion–and a fair bit of controversy.

Today, the iPhone is nearly three years old. It has sold 50 million units worldwide, and the multitouch interface and app ecosystem it pioneered have arguably revolutionized the smartphone industry.

Today, the iPad is no longer a rumor. Launched just two months ago, it has already sold two million units and seems poised to revolutionize an industry or two of its own.

And today, Jobs is once again shaking up an industry with another open letter, “Thoughts on Flash,” a withering rumination on Adobe’s (ADBE) Flash platform and the future of online video.

Much has changed in three years. But one thing has remained constant: Apple, under Jobs, continues to drive innovation in every industry it touches.

Liveblog

A note about our coverage: This liveblog is not an official transcript of the conversation that occurred onstage. Rather, it is a compilation of quotes, paraphrased statements and ad-lib observations written and posted to the Web as quickly as possible. It is not intended as a transcript and should not be interpreted as one.

5:54 pm: In a few moments, Steve Jobs will once again take the D stage for the opening session of D8.

6:21 pm: Following a welcome from News Corp. (NWS) CEO Rupert Murdoch and a few introductory remarks from Walt and Kara, the pair welcome Jobs to the stage.

6:22 pm: The first question is about Apple surpassing Microsoft in market valuation. Jobs says “It’s surreal, but it doesn’t really mean anything.”

6:23 pm Walt references Jobs’s recent “Thoughts on Flash” essay. Even if everything you say is true, is it really fair to consumers to be so abrupt and cut them off, he asks? Jobs doesn’t seem to think it’s unfair. “Apple is a company that doesn’t have the most resources in the world, and they way we’ve succeeded is to bet the right technological horse, to look at technologies that have a future. We try to pick things that are in their springs. And if you choose wisely, you can be quite successful.”

Apple has a history of doing that, Jobs says, noting that Apple was the first company to dump the floppy and later, to adopt USB. “Sometimes when we get rid of things, people call us crazy….But sometimes you just have to pick the things that are going to be the right horse to ride forward….And Flash has had it’s day…but HTML5 is starting emerge….The video looks better and it works better and you don’t need a plug-in to run it. And while 75 percent of the video on the Web may be available in Flash, a lot of it is available in HTML5 as well.”

6:29 pm: What about developers, asks Walt. How are they impacted? Jobs draws a quick parallel to Apple’s HyperCard. “HyperCard was huge in its day,” he says, going on to note that the thousands of apps on the iPhone OS platform are testament to developer involvement.

6:31 pm: Jobs: “We didn’t set out to have a war over Flash. We made a technical decision. And it wasn’t until the iPad that Adobe raised a stink. They came after us….That’s why I wrote “Thoughts on Flash.”…We were getting tired of being trashed by Adobe in the press.”

6:32 pm: Walt: What if people demand Flash. What if they say the iPad is crippled without Flash. “We’re just trying to make great products,” says Jobs again. “We don’t think Flash makes a great product, so we’re leaving it out. Instead, we’re going to focus on technologies that are in ascendancy. If we succeed, people will buy them and if we don’t they won’t….And, so far, I have to say, people seem to be liking the iPad. We are selling an iPad every 3 seconds.”

Steve Jobs at D8

6:35 pm: Ah! The inevitable lost-iPhone question. Walt quickly recounts the history of the discovery of the iPhone prototype, its revelation on Gizmodo and the subsequent police investigation that involved the seizure of a blogger’s computers. Where do you come down on this, asks Walt. “To make a wireless product work well, you have to test it. And one of our employees was carrying one and there’s a debate about whether it was left in a bar or stolen….And the person who found it decided to sell it…and it turned out this person plugged it into his roommate’s computer and that roommate called the police.”

6:40 pm: Jobs continues, “And the police showed up and took this guy’s computers…and the DA is investigating it…and I don’t know where it will end up.” In other words, it’s a police matter. That said, Jobs is very clearly irked by the whole debacle.

6:40 pm: Any comments on the Foxconn suicides which we’ve been hearing so much about, asks Kara. Apple is extraordinarily diligent and rigorous about vetting its manufacturing partners, Jobs answers. “Foxconn is not a sweatshop,” he adds. “They’ve got restaurants and swimming pools….For a factory, it’s a pretty nice factory.”

6:42 pm: Jobs notes that the recent suicides at Foxconn, which number 13 at last count, I think, are still below the national average in the U.S. “But this is very troubling to us,” he says. “So we send over our own people and some outside folks as well, to look into the issue.”

6:44 pm: Walt: You spent a significant portion of your career involved in a platform war with Microsoft (MSFT). And you lost. But now there are new platforms out there and you’re doing quite well on them, as are others–Google (GOOG) and Facebook. So there’s a new platform war going on. Do you see it like that?

No, we don’t see ourselves in a platform war says Jobs. “We never saw ourselves in a platform war with Microsoft, either…Maybe that’s why we lost. … But we never thought of ourselves in a platform war; we just wanted to make good products.”

And what about Google, asks Walt. The relationship has clearly changed there, hasn’t it? “Well, they’re competing with us,” says Jobs, referring to the mobile space. “We didn’t go into search.”

Steve Jobs at D8

6:47 pm: Kara: How do you look at Google as a competitor? Eric [Schmidt, Google CEO] was on your board.

Jobs: “They decided to compete with us and got more and more serious.”

Walt circles back, asking if Jobs doesn’t feel betrayed by Google. Jobs, clearly not buying in to this line of questioning, parries: “My sex life is great, how’s yours” he says trying to end it.

6:50 pm: Kara asks if Apple might remove Google from the iPhone and iPad. Jobs says no. Again, he notes that Apple is simply trying to make the best products it can and that the market will decide whose is better. “Right now, we have the better product.”

6:52 pm: Walt wonders why Apple bought Siri, a search company. “I don’t know if I would describe Siri as a search company,” Jobs says. “They’re not in the search area…they’re in the AI area.” Then he adds, a bit vehemently: “We’re not going into search.”

6:53 pm: Walt asks about AT&T (T), whose network continues to face criticism. Jobs: They’re doing pretty good in some ways and in others they could do better. We meet with them once a quarter. Remember, they deal with way more data traffic than anyone else. And they’re having trouble. But they have the fastest 3G network and they’re improving. I wish they were improving faster….I’m convinced that any other network, had you put the iPhone on it, would have had the same problems.

Steve Jobs with Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher at D8

6:56 pm: Jobs continues: We found a way to sell the phone that we wanted to sell and to define it the way we wanted to define it. We were able to change the rules of the game, and that’s what got us excited about the phone business….AT&T took a big leap on us and decided they were going to trust us to do the right thing with the phone. And that’s worked out quite well for both of us.

6:59 pm: The conversation moves to talk of tablets. Walt asks if Apple knew it would build a tablet before it built the iPhone.

Jobs: “I’ll tell you a secret. It began with the tablet. I had this idea about having a glass display, a multitouch display you could type on with your fingers. I asked our people about it. And six months later, they came back with this amazing display. And I gave it to one of our really brilliant UI guys. He got [rubber band] scrolling working and some other things, and I thought, ‘my God, we can build a phone with this!’ So we put the tablet aside, and we went to work on the iPhone.”

7:01 pm: What does the iPad mean for the publishing industry, Kara asks. Is it the savior that some are touting it as?

“One of my beliefs very strongly is that any democracy depends on a free, healthy press, and so when I think of the most important journalistic endeavors in this country, I think of things like the Washington Post, the New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and publications like that,” Jobs replies. “And we all know what’s happened to the economics of those businesses. I don’t want to see us descend into a nation of bloggers. Anything that we can do to help the news-gathering organizations find new ways of expression so that they can afford to keep their news-gathering and editorial operations intact, I’m all for.”

Steve Jobs says they started the tablet project before the iPhone.

7:03 pm: Jobs adds that he believes people are willing to pay for content and that content providers are not pricing their offerings as aggressively as they should.

7:05 pm: When you did your presentation on the iPad, you described it as a new category of device, says Walt. But in order for it to succeed, people have to feel that it’s worth carrying around. Do you think the tablet will succeed the laptop, he asks.

Jobs: “When we were an agrarian nation, all cars were trucks, because that’s what you needed on the farm. But as vehicles started to be used in the urban centers, cars got more popular. Innovations like automatic transmission and power steering and things that you didn’t care about in a truck as much started to become paramount in cars. … PCs are going to be like trucks. They’re still going to be around, they’re still going to have a lot of value, but they’re going to be used by one out of X people. … I think that we’re embarked on that. Is the next step the iPad? Who knows? Will it happen next year or five years from now or seven years from now? Who knows? But I think we’re headed in that direction.”

7:10 pm: What are your thoughts on content creation on the iPad, Walt asks, noting that some people believe tablets aren’t good devices for content creation.

“Well, why wouldn’t they be good for content creation,” asks Jobs. “It can’t be that the software isn’t powerful enough, because the software is improving….These devices over time are going to grow to do new things. … You know, people laugh at me because I use the phrase “magical” to describe the iPad. But it’s what I really think. You have a much more direct and intimate relationship with the Internet and media, your apps, your content. It’s like some intermediate thing has been removed and stripped away. …. I think we’re just scratching the surface on the kind of apps we can build for it. I think one can create a lot of content on the tablet.”

What sorts of apps, asks Kara.

Productivity apps…video-editing software, says Jobs.

7:12 pm: Now a question about App Store rejections: Isn’t there a downside to Apple’s efforts to protect its customers from porn, malware, etc.

In reply, Jobs first notes that Apple, by supporting HTML5, supports a completely open platform. But it also supports a curated platform–iPhone OS. And that platform has rules. “We approve 95 percent of the apps that are submitted to the App Store every week and we approve them within in seven days.”

So what happened with that political-cartoon app you declined to approve a few weeks ago, asks Walt.

“We have a rule that says you can’t defame people,” says Jobs, noting that political cartoonists by virtue of their profession sometimes defame people. The cartoon app was rejected on those grounds, he adds. “Then we changed the rules…and in the meantime, the cartoonist won a Pulitzer….But he never resubmitted his app. And then someone asked him, ‘Hey why don’t you have an iPhone app?’ He says we rejected it and suddenly, it’s a story in the press….Bottom line is, yes, we sometimes make mistakes…but we correct them….We are doing the best we can, changing the rules when it makes sense. What happens sometimes is that some people lie, we find it, and reject it, and they run to the press, and get their 15 minutes of fame and hope it will get us to change our minds. We take it on the chin, and we move on.”

The view from the D8 conference ballroom.

7:20 pm: Kara: “What do you do all day?”

Jobs: “I have one of the best jobs in the world. I get to hang out with some of the most talented, committed people around and together we get to play in this sandbox and build these cool products….Apple is an incredibly collaborative company. You know how many committees we have at Apple? Zero. We’re structured like a start-up. We’re the biggest start-up on the planet. And we all meet once a week to discuss our business…and there’s tremendous teamwork at the top and that filters down to the other employees…and so what I do all day is meet with teams of people and work on ideas and new problems to come up with new products.”

7:24 pm: Are people willing to tell you that you’re wrong, asks Walt.

Of course, Jobs answers. The best ideas have to win, no matter who has them.

7:25 pm: What do you imagine the next 10 years of your life is going to be about?

Oddly Jobs replies with a comment about Gizmodo and the lost iPhone prototype. “When this whole thing with Gizmodo happened, I got a lot of advice from people who said you’ve got to just let it slide…you shouldn’t go after a journalist because they bought stolen property and tried to extort you….And I thought about that and I decided that Apple can’t afford to change its core values and simply let it slide….We have the same core values as when we started, and we come into work wanting to do the same thing today that we wanted to do five years ago.”

7:27 pm: But you are going into new businesses, says Walt, trying to redirect Jobs back to the question at hand or at least get him to comment on any new markets that the company is eyeing. Advertising, for example, with its new iAds initiative.

Jobs concedes that Apple is pursuing new businesses like iAds. But he suggests the main reason it’s doing that is to make its developers more money. “We want to help our developers make some money so that they can keep providing free or really low-cost apps to customers,” he says. “That’s why we’re doing it. We’re not going to make much money in the ad business.”

7:29 pm: Jobs continues on the mobile advertising theme. “Something really interesting is happening on mobile phones,” he says. “They’re not mirroring desktops or laptop PCs. If people want to find out what restaurant to go to, they’re not going to their search engine typing in “Japanese” and “Palo Alto,” they’re going to Yelp or whatever app they want. Ads in mobile apps today, you touch them, and what is the first thing they do? They rip you out of your app, send you to the browser and then you’ve got to figure out a way back to your app. So, wouldn’t it be great if mobile ads didn’t take you out of the app, but rather took over the screen, gave you this great experience of an interactive ad, but anytime you wanted you could hit a little button that takes you right back to where you left off in your app? We figured out we could build something like this into the operating system so the apps don’t have to do it. We can make it so that an app developer can add these interactive ads in their apps with 30 minutes’ worth of work versus working with every advertiser to do some custom thing in their app, which is crazy.”

7:31 pm: A question about privacy. Is privacy looked at differently in Silicon Valley than in the rest of the world?

“We’ve always had a very different view of privacy than some of our colleagues in the Valley,” Jobs says. “We take privacy extremely seriously. That’s one of the reasons we have the curated apps store. We have rejected a lot of apps that want to take a lot of your personal data and suck it up into the cloud. Privacy means people know what they’re signing up for. In plain English, and repeatedly, that’s what it means. Ask them. Ask them every time. Make them tell you to stop asking if they get tired of your asking them. Let them know precisely what you’re going to do with their data.”

Steve Jobs

Q&A

Q: Given the events of the past few years, what would you add to the Stanford graduation speech you gave a few years ago?

A: I’ve no idea. I’d probably just turn up the volume a little bit because the past few years have reminded me how precious life is.

Q: I’d like you to put your Disney hat on for a moment….How do you preserve the value of content?

A: The way that we market movies is undergoing a radical shift. It used to be that you spent a fortune on advertising on TV running your trailers. But now you can advertise on the Web….When we went to the music companies, we said “who is your customer?” And they said, “Best Buy, Tower”…their distribution partners. But that wasn’t their customer. They needed to recognize who their true customer was….So what changed in the music business was not the back end, but the front end. The way that you market to the consumer….The film industry needs to embrace that. And it needs to let people watch the content they want to watch, when they want to watch it and where they want to watch it.”

Steve Jobs.

Q: A complaint about dropped calls on AT&T’s networks. Is someone from Apple working on that?

A: You can bet we’re doing everything we can do….I can tell you what I’m told by reliable people: To make things better, people reallocate spectrum and they do things like increasing backhaul and they put in more robust switches…and things in general, when they start to fix them, get worse before they get better…and if you believe that, things should be getting a lot better real soon.

Q: How is HDCP helping the antipiracy effort?

A: We didn’t invent the stuff. The problem is that Hollywood doesn’t want what happened to the music industry to happen to them. You can’t blame them. But content protection isn’t their business and they’re grasping at straws here. But we’ve got to deal with their restrictions….I feel your pain.

Q: What’s your vision of social gaming?

A: Clearly, iPhone and iPod touch have created a new class of gaming and it’s a subset of casual gaming, but it’s surprising how good the games are. Typical console games cost $40, but on the iPhone, they cost somewhere between free and $10, and gaming on the platform is taking off. We’re trying to do the right things to enable more gaming and social gaming.

Q: Is it time to throw out the interface for TV? Does television need a new human interface.

A: The problem with innovation in the TV industry is the go-to-market strategy. The TV industry has a subsidized model that gives everyone a set top box for free. So no one wants to buy a box. Ask TiVo, ask Roku, ask us… ask Google in a few months. The television industry fundamentally has a subsidized business model that gives everyone a set-top box, and that pretty much undermines innovation in the sector. The only way this is going to change is if you start from scratch, tear up the box, redesign and get it to the consumer in a way that they want to buy it. But right now, there’s no way to do that….The TV is going to lose until there’s a viable go-to-market strategy. That’s the fundamental problem with the industry. It’s not a problem with the technology, it’s a problem with the go-to-market strategy….I’m sure smarter people than us will figure this out, but that’s why we say Apple TV is a hobby.

Steve Jobs Session Photos

1 of 43  Back  Next

Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher with Steve Jobs at the D8 conference on June 1.

More Coverage on the Steve Jobs D8 Speaker Page »


comments so far. Add yours.

  • flow_hoe

    First Post!! Go get 'em Stewie!

  • slyttleton

    Why are we talking so much about Apple and not Microsoft?

    “The only problem with Microsoft is they just have no taste. They have absolutely no taste. And what that means is – I don’t mean that in a small way, I mean that in a big way – in the sense that…they don’t think of original ideas and they don’t bring much culture into their product. And you say, why is that important? Well, you know, proportionally spaced fonts come from typesetting and beautiful books; that’s where one gets the idea. If it weren’t for the Mac, they would never have that in their products. And, so I guess I am saddened – not by Microsoft’s success, I have no problem with their success; they’ve earned their success…for the most part – I have a problem with the fact that they just make really third-rate products.”

    Steve Jobs

  • http://www.scripting.com/ dave

    I must be missing it — will there be live video of this interview, if so where? Looking forward! :-)

  • http://xentek.net/ Eric Marden

    The new Apple TV has already been discussed in the press recently. So far all we know is that it will run the iPhone OS and not OS X-lite. No word on whether it will support apps, but I'm sure that it will (given the change in underlying Operating System). I fully expect it to be announced soon. There are a number of Apple events coming up including WWDC.

  • JohnDoey

    Who is Microsoft?

  • http://www.MindSmack.com/blog mindsmack

    If there a live video feed?

  • Anonymous

    You ridicule HTML5 and then claim Apple is all about closed products?

    Yes Apple has some very closed (he called them “curated”) components, but they are also major driving forces behind many of the central open platforms today – HTML5 which you mocked is one, but more importantly is Webkit which cell phone makers like Android use to create the browsers that really work well with the web and HTML. Apple pushed for DRM free music, and uses the standard ePub format for digital book publishing when they could have gone with something proprietary… it’s also funny you should think Steve Jobs has something against PDF when both the Mac and the Mobile OSX platform have excellent PDF support built in, not just for reading but for generating new PDF content.

    Apple is a mix between open and closed components, I’m not sure why people like you chose to entirely ignore all the work Apple puts into making the open components work really well, and share that work with the community.

  • canada420

    IS there going to be a live video feed?

  • canada420

    Is there going to be a live video feed?

  • http://chris24.ca/ Chris Thomson
  • thombombadil

    huh? so, really, there wont be a stream?

  • canada420

    All The D is going for the “let's pretend the web doesn't exist” route. What is this 1999? Get a video feed already.

  • iComet

    I hope they ask him questions regarding the new iPhone 4G and iTouch 4G rumors with sightings in Vietnam and now Portugal!
    Oh, and Flash. ;D

  • iComet

    I hope they ask him questions regarding the new iPhone 4G and iTouch 4G rumors…
    Oh, and Flash. ;D

  • http://businessmindhacks.com AlexSchleber

    Did he really just say this? Or is this reader comment satire…

    Either way, even worse (though related) is MSFT's unbelievably high R&D spend (~ $7-9B / year) contrasted with how little has come of it. It’s possibly more than all of the angel and VC investment funds for hungry start-ups combined! Shocking.

    As a long-time MSFT customer, I’ve always said: I just wish they’d be doing more with all of the money we gave them (including maybe a little more taste/design). Clearly, they have very limited productive use for it. A monopoly is a massive money and talent sink…

  • http://businessmindhacks.com AlexSchleber

    So where is the “live” blogging?! From my watch, we're about 20 minutes into the 6pm PT Jobs #D8 talk..

  • ChKen

    I am quite sure if you look at the transcript from Steve's last interview at D, he related the story of how the iPhone came into being, from ongoing research into tablet computing.

  • Kent Calero

    “My Sex Life Is Good”

    am I the only one that read that he gets fu***d a lot? as in Eric being at google was indeed a betrayal?

  • Joe Aveni

    Steve Jobs tries hard to personify's the image of “open” environments.When the honest fact is that the Apple product line is one of the most closed system in technology today. It hearkens back to the days when Digital Systems “aka DEC” was pitched as an open network, as long as you had a DEC system. When will Jobs allow Abobe Flash to run on their products..oh I know when Steve Jobs get over the fact the “PDF” format was not his idea.
    HTML 5 give me a break.

  • letmechoose

    Sorry, but I have just lost my trust in Apple and Jobs in particular. He's always been opinionated, but it always seemed for the right causes. Now, it's just too damn obvious that it's all about money and control, not the consumer.

  • RandomData

    While I understand what you are trying to say, technically speaking, there is nothing stopping Adobe from bringing Flash to the iPhone. http://slashdot.org/story/10/06/01/1748200

  • Andy_Myers
  • RandomData

    This is not the first time that Jobs has told developers that they had better use Xcode and Objective-C. Last time it was because of the switch to Intel. Those who listened were just a compile away from the new platform, those who did not were in for a world of hurt.

    There is strong evidence mounting that Apple is set to make a similar switch, but this time requiring that developers compile to an intermediate bytecode language (think Java, .NET). The move would allow developers to compile once and let the App Store provide the architecture-specifc binary at download time. While it is doubtful the next generation iPhone will feature a new architecture at this stage, it is inevitable we will see one someday. Maybe sooner than you think.

    Flash sucks and has always sucked, so it provides a nice smokescreen for Apple to try and hide their real intentions before they are ready for announcement.

  • Andy_Myers

    The analogy about farmer's and trucks is brilliant! I can't wait until the day when techie's and power users are the only ones with personal computers and the rest of the world has their simple fixed function devices.

    The thing I miss most about the 90's is having something that everyone and their brother didn't. A computer!

  • letmechoose

    I agree with your insight as to what this is really about, but I disagree with the comments about Flash. If Flash sucks so bad, why is it the ruling video and game delivery engine on the web? Have you noticed how *every* video you see regarding the Apple vs Adobe battle over Thoughts On Flash is itself, rendered in Flash ?! :) Every video on this site uses Flash, and so on.

    Should the HTML specification natively support video playback? Absolutely! Does that actually cover everything that Flash is used for? Absolutely NOT! As much as I love Apple, I have to side with Google and Adobe on this one, I too believe in a world where HTML5 and Flash will co-exists. I'm a firm believer in the right tool for the job, and while HTML5 may cover video playback (at some point in not-so-near future), it will never be able to do everything that Flash can when it comes to providing a rich media experience. Have you seen where WIRED's magazine viewer ended up? A nice app by any means, but nothing like the experience they had created in Flash.

    I think the Flash issue will come back to take a bite out of Apple in the end, no pun intended.

  • hooms

    @Joe Aveni
    There's a vast difference between “closed” and “curated”. Every company, without exception, tries to personify the image of “open” environments – both technically and philosophically – on their own terms. Entities like Apple who have a clear idea of who they are and the values they stand for, can define it exactly as they like. Those dubbing themselves “open” as a byword for “free-for-all” (Google) or “we're open… if you tilt your head just so” (Adobe), clearly have no idea who they are, wanting to be all things to everyone to make a quick, meritless buck!

  • RandomData

    Suck is, perhaps, a strong word, but Flash has never presented a desirable user experience. Even the most talented Flash developers were never truly able to integrate their content into the surrounding document. The result is a clumsy user experience at best.

    The result: It was easy to get people on board with the Flash hate bandwagon. People already, deep down, did not truly enjoy the Flash experience. Jobs only validated what they were already thinking.

    Interestingly, we now have more than one implementation of Flash in HTML5. Yes, your iPhone and iPad can play Flash content right now! What is most disconcerting, in my opinion, is that it took efforts of third-parties to make it happen. I know Apple was not exactly playing nice, but Adobe just ran away crying. They didn't even try to support their platform and their users.

  • WaltFrench

    Let's agree: “open” has been an important movement in computing. It has been a huge success on servers and is important in several product categories. It's already an important part of the mobile space, and may be a game changer. Much of the user-facing part of the web depend on it.

    But open partisans have seen a decade of desktop OS wishes and hard work come to nearly nothing, and some critical aspects of the web as we know it are as closed as can be.

    Google absolutely does not disclose its search algorithms, and those totally closed models have earned them a de facto monopoly in search that has made them a hugely profitable ad business. Flash is copyrighted by Adobe; non-Adobe implementations are less than 1% of all users' machines. It exists nowhere that Adobe hasn't deigned to commit sufficient resources, which means there's not a usable production version on any smartphone, eight years after Palm invented the category.* And Adobe uses this monopoly to create barriers to those who would compete with their graphical tools, their lifeblood.

    @Joe, if you're correct, Apple's closed side will cause it to fail against the onslaught of “open,” and you can save your snide comments. But if indeed that's the issue, I, for one, will miss Google; my designer friends will miss Adobe and my IT Dept people will miss Microsoft, too.

    * Obviously, 8 years is several lifetimes in the mobile space. Even the Google Nexus, Adobe's poster child for how they're going to do a great job on smart phones, has been deprecated (Google's directing would-be customers to another HTC-made phone) and Flash is still not in version 1.0 release on it.

  • WaltFrench

    I'll briefly note that the D8 session features Jobs claiming the Flash issue was internal and technical before Adobe raised it in the press. (An Adobe employee's “Screw You, Apple” blog, edited with Adobe's lawyers' inputs, might have provoked his more reasoned manifesto.)

    That said, it IS a nuisance for everybody I know who surfs on a smart phone. Nobody I know has downloaded the awful buggy versions that Adobe has released, and there are as yet no production releases. Not on Blackberry. Not on Palm. Not on Windows Mobile. Not on Nokia. Not, unsurprisingly, on Apple mobiles. Not even on Androids. Somehow, it's hard to see Steve Jobs's attitude as the issue here, @LetMeChoose.

    Meanwhile: my smartphone has 10% of the CPU power of the laptop I'm using now. Only 3% of the working RAM. My laptop's graphics chips alone (forget the Intel inside) would burn thru my cellphone's battery in 5 minutes at its rated power.

    Since Palm invented the category in 2002, smartphones have been obeying Moore's Law, getting more powerful each year. And Adobe keeps working on the challenge, although fitfully: they eliminated the mobile Flash team in 2005 when they bought Flash, but have been serious at least since the last year or so, of getting these newfangled little sedans to do the work of the Kenworth trucks we've been driving. Sooner or later, they'll get there, although Adobe will never implement it on the great majority of today's smartphones.

    And as you note, Life Goes On without them on smartphones, although not quite the way we might like.

  • ipadgbwifi
  • johnapart

    Video?

  • http://startups.com/ Ralph Fleming

    In my opinion the program and the interview was great and very interesting, no matter how many objections we can have about the fact it was Apple's CEO and about what was said. Besides, this article has covered the whole program in a very professional way. It was like watching it for a second time. Thanks for sharing.

  • http://e-irfan.com/ Irfan Suleman Chohdry

    AWESOME :)

  • GusPineda

    Jobs has a great vision, but things are about to change his point of view is very valid about Flash, since Adobe took control of great macromedia products the quality and stability of the programs decreased, I was testing what smokescreen.us did with their flash player based on javascript and it works you can see flash content playing in my site take a look http://www.neoactiva.com/ipad.html of course it is not perfect but it is something, it means Flash development is not complete out of the game, it needs alot of improvement and it is working .
    I did many years ago a flash animation with my logo in 3D a swf and with this script it is working, Take a look and let me know your thoughts. I want to work with this technology and try to make it work with adobe help or not or with smokescreen help or not.

  • sdsamsarah

    Why if Steve Jobs was first working on a tablet rather than on a phone, does he say such nonsense during his keynote in January 2007?
    May Walt Mossberg wasn't there to meet such nonsense?
    Please listen carefully, what Steve says. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVrcQu_Q1R8)

    Then look at this concept (http://www.hb-improving.com/us.....s_i…)

  • Aslam Nathoo

    Excuse me but will there be a full session videos posted at some point? I know that you Walk had written previously that there would be no live streaming but In previous years a full session video was posted usually by the next morning (as evidenced by the videos on the right-hand side panel). Will that be the case this year? If so, when can we expect that to be posted?

    Thanks,
    Aslam

    P.S. You folks really should get on the streaming. For a conference that has the word digital in its name, it really is a rather glaring omission. Maybe there's a good reason as to why it is not being streamed. If so, can someone please post it here for our edification?

  • James Rodriguez

    just a little corp we dont care about . theyre probably an amalgamation of little apple projects that didn't make it… like most they couldn't prejudge as unmarketable. the tablet shows real dedication i think microsoft might just be the biggest scapegoat for this company to start over and push the rest into new sectors. I dont know, this may take a little longer to grasp.. Did you really enjoy this yahoo thing they're all on about.. it sounds like another one of those inane products no one needs.. even if it takes a while….. not anyone important. right?

    bye doey, well miss your words of wisdom. or not.
    lol.. next

  • JohnPaczkowski

    We're posting video of the entire interview on Monday.

  • djfkjo

    Steve mentions high school kids here in Palo Alto committing suicide by throwing themselves in front of Amtrak trains. Small correction… Caltrains not Amtrak. If we had a bit more local engaged parenting/community, this too would subside.

  • djfkjo

    Steve comments on high school kids here in Palo Alto committing suicide by throwing themselves in front of Amtrak trains. Small correction, we have no Amtrak trains, it's Caltrains… but the MOST important point is that we could stand more engaged parenting/community to go along with our great technology and products.

  • http://AllThingsD.com Christine Mohan

    We just posted full-length video of Steve Jobs session at D8:
    http://video.allthingsd.com/vi.....obs…

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/KMX3R6QZZN4VKKN3RLYECDYBGE kurt

    Please post an HTML5 compatible version that we can watch without installing Flash!

  • http://thenewcareersblog.com career ideas

    I L O V E APPLE

D8 Conference

Conversations with the most influential figures in media and technology.
June 1-3, 2010
Rancho Palos Verdes, California

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

D Conference Mailing List

Sign up for News about D Conferences