Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Pulse iPad App Gets Steve Jobs's Praise in Morning…Then Booted From App Store Hours Later After NYT Complains

Yesterday morning, the pair of Stanford University graduate students who made the hot news-reading iPad app, Pulse News Reader, were ecstatic to be mentioned first–for being among the most promising developers for the new tablet device–by Apple CEO Steve Jobs in his keynote speech at the Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco.

But by the afternoon, that flush of entrepreneurial success had turned sour, after Apple (AAPL) informed the two that Pulse was being pulled from the App Store after it received a written notice from the New York Times Company (NYT) declaring that “The New York Times Company believes your application named ‘Pulse News Reader’ infringes The New York Times Company’s rights.”

In an unusual coincidence, the Times Web site was on prominent display on a huge screenshot of the iPad during Jobs’s speech.

Ironically, the Times wrote a big wet kiss about Pulse last week in a blog post titled “The iPad Pulse Reader Scales the Charts,” by tech writer Brad Stone.

“Pulse is a stylish and easy-to-use news aggregator,” wrote Stone. “News organizations still puzzling over their iPad strategies can perhaps derive some hope from Pulse’s success–or at least its price tag.”

No longer. Pulse was down completely by 6:30 pm PT last night.

Reads a notice on iTunes now: “Your request could not be completed. The item you’ve requested is not currently available in the U.S. store.”

“I don’t blame Apple, because they have to respond when contacted by lawyers from the Times,” said Akshay Kothari, a 23-year-old student of well-known Silicon Valley investor Michael Dearing’s Launch Pad class at Stanford, of the letter the media giant sent to Apple (which is below, along with the take-down notice).

“But it was definitely a roller coaster of a day.”

In fact, it has been all up for the past four weeks, since Kothari and 22-year-old Ankit Gupta released the Pulse iPad app, creating it for the class, which requires students to develop and put out a product.

Both are at Stanford’s Institute of Design and created a company called Alphonso Labs.

The app was quickly approved after about four weeks of development. Since then, it has taken off strongly, downloaded 35,000 times at a $4 price tag, even rising to No. 1 in paid apps several times, as noted prominently in the lead of the Times story.

Kothari said that the pair plan to contact Apple in the morning and take steps to remove Times material from the feeds.

It is not immediately clear why they need to, since Pulse draws from publicly available Times RSS feeds, as do many other apps, and does no scraping.

In fact, Pulse is little more than a really well-designed RSS reader, which is what the Times said it was in its write-up. You add feeds to it and it visualizes them in a way that’s easy to get through.

The Times story did have one ominous-in-retrospect note about Pulse: “It also lets people easily share articles through Twitter and Facebook–bypassing the individual sharing tools presented by each news site.”

But Pulse is pretty basic and is similar to many others readers.

In the New York Times case, as with others, one view is plain text and only shows whatever the Times puts in its RSS feed, which isn’t much. And its Web view seems to be just an in-app browser that takes you straight to the page that is in the link with the RSS feed.

You can see both here below:

The Times lawyer, Richard Samson, sees it differently, apparently, since it is a paid app rather than a free one, noting in the Times June 3 notice to Apple, which came two days after the newspaper’s article about Pulse:

“The Pulse News Reader app, makes commercial use of the NYTimes.com and Boston.com RSS feeds, in violation of their Terms of Use*. Thus, the use of our content is unlicensed. The app also frames the NYTimes.com and Boston.com websites in violation of their respective Terms of Use.”

Samson also complained about how Pulse was marketed in the App Store, a screenshot of which you can see below:

BoomTown sent an email to Samson, as well as to Apple, for comment.

Until I hear back, here is the email from the App store to Pulse, including the letter from the Times lawyer–I removed personal email addresses and phone numbers, along with the number of the Pulse case Apple gave it–as well as a lovely video of Pulse in action:

From: App Store Notices
Date: Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM
Subject: Apple Inc. (our ref# APPXXXX)
To: Akshay Kothari

Dear Sir or Madam,

**Please include APPXXXX in the subject line of any future correspondence on this matter.**

We received a written notice from The New York Times Company that The New York Times Company believes your application named “Pulse News Reader” infringes The New York Times Company’s rights. A copy of the notice is attached.

Accordingly, we have pulled your application from the App Store. Please contact The New York Times Company directly regarding any questions or concerns you may have.

For any technical questions, please contact iTunes Connect: www.apple.com/itunes/go/itunesconnect/contactus.

Thank you for your immediate attention.

Sincerely,

? iTunes Music Marketing & IP Legal | Apple | 1 Infinite Loop | Cupertino | CA | 95014 | AppStoreNotices@apple.com

Begin forwarded message:

From: “Samson, Richard S”
Date: June 3, 2010 10:51:23 AM PDT
To:”‘appstorenotices@apple.com’”
Cc: “Samuels, Robert”, “Manning, Michael”
Subject: infringing “Pulse News Reader” iPad app

Hello-

I am writing again, on behalf of The Boston Globe, Boston.com and The New York Times Company, about the infringing iPad app, “Pulse News Reader” produced by Alphonso Labs Inc. (please see pertinent details, link and screenshots below).

The infringing app is available on the iTunes store here: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pulse-news-reader/id371088673?mt=8

The Pulse News Reader app, makes commercial use of the NYTimes.com and Boston.com RSS feeds, in violation of their Terms of Use*. Thus, the use of our content is unlicensed. The app also frames the NYTimes.com and Boston.com websites in violation of their respective Terms of Use.

I note that the app is delivered with the NYTimes.com RSS feed preloaded, which is prominently featured in the screen shots used to sell the app on iTunes.

I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in this notification is accurate to the best of our knowledge and that I am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyrights and trademarks of The Boston Globe, Boston.com and The New York Times Company. We hereby demand that you immediately and permanently remove this app from the iTunes site.

Please let me know if you need any further information or have any questions. I can be reached directly at this Email or at the phone number below.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Richard Samson

Richard Samson
Senior Counsel
The New York Times Company
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10018

* NYTimes.com Terms of Service, paragraph 2.2: “The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to U.S. and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of these Terms of Service), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.”

* Boston.com Terms of Service, paragraph 2.2: “The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to U.S.and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of this Agreement), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.”

[All Things Digital intern Drake Martinet contributed to this report.]


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    “The app also frames the NYTimes.com and Boston.com websites in violation of their respective Terms of Use.”” so will they sue browser makers next?

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    Wow, now I really feel that I should take the time to learn Objective C and write apps for the app store that can be removed at the slightest provocation from either Steve Jobs or one of my competitors. What a great model Steve came up with, I'm sure that business everywhere will be lining up to waste their time with < 1% of the overall computing market and the possibility of having their hard work and dedication to the platform flung in their faces.

  • nickkuh

    Even as an Apple Fanboy and fellow iPad Developer I am so dissapointed in Apple to hear this news story. Apple and NYT should be asshamed of themselves. Pulse is one of the best apps for the iPad right now. Unbelievable.

  • JohnDoey

    Yeah, developers are lining up, because Apple has paid developers over a billion dollars. Also, Apple has the only mobile platform with native C apps. They are on the forefront of this so they get to be at the center when problems arise.

    If you aren't aware that outfits like NY Times are struggling to come to grips with technology, you can read about it for free on the Web.

    Pulse clearly pushed the line between browser and publisher, because the app comes stocked with feeds. It is great they pushed that line but sometimes it doesn't work. They probably have to ship the app with no feeds and come up with an easy way for users to add their own selected feeds on first launch.

  • MarkKB

    OK, that's *really* flimsy reasoning – from my reading, Pulse is breaking copyright about as much as any internet browser or feed reader. The fact that it's a paid app doesn't even come into it.

  • http://www.mac-adam.com/ Adam Turetzky

    So according to New York Times lawyer Richard Samson any web browser or RSS reader software, especially those programs that are sold for money, are violating the Times copyright by simply displaying their freely published material.

    Boy I hope this guy doesn't find out some people fold their paper when they read it! And restaurants which offer you a paper to read charge for the food you eat while you read it. And eyeglass manufacturers, oh the horror!

    Someone tell Grandpa to get off the internet and stop writing letters!

  • numpty

    The app store model is utterly irrelevant to this story, as I'm sure you're aware. Any paid-for app that offers similar functionality, on any platform, is/would be in breach of the NYT terms and conditions, if their lawyers are to be believed.

  • http://stopmebeforeiblogagain.com/ Vidar 'blacktar' Andersen

    I think the Pulse team should send NYT a generous gift basket for the constant free advertising they seem insisting on giving them.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    My point stands, and you stood it up: “if their lawyers are to be believed”. It's to late to ask whom to believe, the question is moot, they're gone. It was Steve's will. I for one am not going to develop for the iPad because it's like playing with fire, will I be the next one to inadvertently curry Steve's wrath? I don't care to find out.

  • GreenMartian

    Apple are being total hypocrites here, given the inclusion of Safari Reader in Safari 5. Safari Reader essentially blocks ads from loading in multi-page articles (after the first page).

    See this article:

    Safari Reader: Apple’s Weapon of Mass Destruction
    http://jimlynch.com/index.php/2010/06/07/safari

  • mediagrunt

    We won't miss you.

  • http://tdhurst.com tdhurst

    It uses publicly-available feeds and charges for it. Sucks, but that's totally against the TOS of most major news org feeds.

  • Frank M.

    This is very disappointing news. The terms of service that are referenced are not legally viable when a company publishes a public RSS feed. The NYT and Boston Globe are not feeds that are pre-built into Pulse to my knowledge and are subjective the end-user directly adding them. This is easily resolvable if Pulse developers want to put a disclaimer prompt within the add RSS feed feature that prompts the end user to acknowledge they understand the content of the RSS feed is respective to terms of service by the RSS provider not Pulse. Unfortnately until the lazy asses at the NYT actually do something creative they will use their legal teams to squash innovation. There are multiple RSS feed applications on the PC and we don't hear them calling their lawyers…sheesh. Maybe Apple could provide subsidized legal services so the 'little guys' have a chance to protect their IP (e.g. applications) from others as well as ensure their applications are not challenged by defacto legal teams working for these large companies.

  • T_shirbert

    So just remove NYT and Boston Globe content from the software and modify it so those feeds can't be added. Seems like a 2 minute fix for the developers and also: VIOLA! nyt.com & boston.com suddenly get about 30,000 less hits per day from ipad users. Way to win that battle, old media!

  • T_shirbert

    So just remove NYT and Boston Globe content from the software and modify it so those feeds can't be added. Seems like a 2 minute fix for the developers and also: VIOLA! nyt.com & boston.com suddenly get about 30,000 less hits per day from ipad users. Way to win that battle, old media!

  • Ted_T

    For a company so adept at controlling its message Apple is remarkably dense sometimes. They could have contacted the developer and told him to urgently submit a new version that doesn't preload RSS feeds in general or feeds from the NY Times Co. in particular. Especially considering the WWDC related timing. If the Times attorney kicks up a storm for the lack of immediate action, point him to his newspaper's own pro-Pulse article, and tell him to cool his jets.

    Instead the go and pull the app, get egg on their face, and Pulse will probably be back after minor modifications. Why???

    As for Shawn “I'm sure that business everywhere will be lining up to waste their time with < 1% of the overall computing market” — keep repeating that, and maybe even you will start believing it.

    For consumer oriented paid programs, Apple is the only game in town right now. You must have missed all the complaints that Apple has a monopoly on mobile apps. Nobody actually pays for the Android, much less WinMo junk. And home users haven't been paying for desktop Windows software that didn't come pre-bundled with their machine in a long time now.

    The truth, ugly or otherwise, for indie developers is the only way to get paid is to develop for Apple devices.

  • http://www.danielmclark.com Daniel M. Clark

    Apple is in the business of making money. True? I mean, so is Microsoft, Dell, Toshiba, Food Network, CBS, Colgate, Mattel and Sarah Michelle Gellar. Apple isn't a non-profit, they have a bottom line to protect, just like every other business. Apple's priority is to protect their business, not the four dollar application that they don't own. Let the app's developers fight the New York Times.

  • http://www.danielmclark.com Daniel M. Clark

    With 200,000 other apps to choose from, that threat has zero effect on anyone. Go develop for Android or Windows Mobile, nobody will even notice, much less care.

    Your paranoia about Steve Jobs is amusing, though.

  • http://www.danielmclark.com Daniel M. Clark

    I'm not disappointed in Apple because it's not their fight. They were threatened with legal action, and if they went to bat for every minor developer that crossed TOS lines, they'd be out of business – and there would be some very, very rich lawyers sipping margaritas in the Caribbean.

    I do think that the New York Times is despicable in their behavior here. TOS or not, saying that someone can't use a publicly available RSS feed is retarded.

  • http://macsmiley.tumblr.com/ MacSmiley

    I highly doubt Steve is happy about this situation. I would expect the contrary.

  • Jason Porter

    You're quite wrong about that. The app itself costs $4, they don't charge you for accessing the feeds.

    Are you suggesting that any software that makes use of RSS feeds in any context must necessarily be free of charge? Microsoft charges for Microsoft Windows, and the included IE has an RSS feed aggregator. Does that mean Microsoft is doing something unethical or counter to the NYT terms of service by selling their operating system? Of course not.

  • http://tdhurst.com tdhurst

    Poor comparison. Without feeds, IE is a browser, capable of displaying
    content in a few ways. Without automatic, built-in access to feeds,
    this is just an rss reader, which in itself is fine.

    If the users choose to subscribe, cool. But when it's auto it becomes
    part of the app and breaks the TOS.

  • Jason Porter

    So if a web browser's default home page is Yahoo, that's commercial “republication” of the Yahoo site? Hardly.

    The NYTimes makes their RSS feeds publicly available for free, specifically to help drive traffic to their web site. If they don't want people to use RSS readers to see the content in the RSS feed, then they shouldn't be broadcasting an RSS feed in the first place!

    Seriously, what is the argument here? That the increased traffic to NYTimes.com is undesirable, so long as it's a result of the RSS feed address being included in the app's included “examples”? If anything, they should be delighted for the free advertising, and patting themselves on the back for being pointed out as a producer of exemplary RSS feed content. The fact that they're “lawyering up” about it instead, displays a rather shocking lack of basic understanding of the technology, at least in the legal department.

    They go further in the text of the letter than just RSS, though… since the app also gives link access through to the full NYTimes web site (in a Safari frame, not stripped), the NYT lawyer is claiming that the display of the web site to the user's screen is a type of infringing republication. That's mindblowing, to me. By that logic, every web browser in existence would be in violation of the ToS just by functioning. I'm sure the NYTimes.com web production team would be absolutely fascinated by that argument.

  • http://tdhurst.com tdhurst

    Yes, and that's exactly the solution Pulse should engineer in order to be compliant. Not that I agree that they should have to, but the ToS excerpts were clear, though misguided and out of touch.

  • http://tdhurst.com tdhurst

    I don't agree with or like it, just interpreting the fairly misguided excerpts from the end of the lawyer's letter.

  • coolfactor

    Steve used Pulse as an example of an excellent app. It wasn't his decision to pull the app, and the app is now back. The App Store staff were following protocol, as any distributor would, and it was up to the developer to challenge that, which they did and succeeded.

    Keep your ignorance and tunnel vision about Steve and Apple to yourself.

  • coolfactor

    NYT need to adjust their Terms if they want to be read.

  • sdfisher

    This is exactly the response that a DMCA takedown notice always gets: First, the content is removed. Second, questions are asked.

    Apple is irrelevant to this, really: they're doing what they're obligated to do.

  • Anonymous

    Wow a whole billion dollars??? You’ve got to be kidding me, and thats divided by what now? 200,000 apps? Thats an average of… $5,000 per app. Damn, don’t tempt me with a down payment on a shiny new Hyundai… I might just give in at any moment…

    How long has the app store been out, like 2, 3 years? Damn man, a billion dollars is nothing in that time, this is America, we have status symbols to maintain.

  • ChKen

    Did you even read the story? There was no slight provocation from Steve or any competitor. It was a C&D from the NYT's lawyer. Put this in the Android store or BB World or Microsoft's or Ovi's and the EXACT SAME THING would have happened. Are you planning to boycott everything, or are you just an Apple hater?

  • ChKen

    You have a reading comprehension problem , apparently, since you still don't get it that this was a C&D from the NYTs lawyers. Interestingly, the Stanford students who wrote the RSS reader seem to understand and will make the changes to satisfy the NYTs. Sadly, you do not have their grace.

  • ChKen

    Apple gets 15,000 apps submitted a week. You clearly think lawyers are reasonable. Surprise! They're not.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    Wow you are such a genius for figuring that out. Newsflash, MS makes money too, but you can write RSS readers all day long that display NYT newsfeeds because newsflash, its actually legal, and if the NYT doesn't want people to do that, they need to stop using RSS feeds, because having and RSS feed and saying another app can't use it, is f****** retarded.

    Thanks for listening.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    I'm saying that IN REAL LIFE, out here in the real world market, this C&D does nothing until *I THE DEVELOPER* act on it. Thats my prerogative, and its my prerogative to mount a defense of myself. DUH.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    Thank you Jason, for having having real live brain cells, you must watch less than 10 hrs a day of our wonderful state sponsored television.

  • http://www.danielmclark.com Daniel M. Clark

    You know what else is “f****** retarded”? Your attitude. Try responding to what I wrote, preferably from an objective point of view. I said, basically, that it's not Apple's business to fight legal battles on behalf of third party developers. Are you arguing with that?

    Elsewhere in the comments here I noted that the NYT is despicable in their behavior here – I believe they are in the WRONG.

    So that the hell are you bitching at me for again?

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    You're right, I was an ass, sorry for that. No excuses. I agree, they shouldn't be arguing on behalf of 3rd party developers. Even so, its a proof of concept that shows the model is unsafe to developers and as a consequence, unsafe for consumers too.

  • bbarlow641

    In trying to understand obscure (often legal) prose, I take it back to its basic – remove all the extra words and just get the basic subject-verb-object form of a sentence. Thus a sentence form the NYT ToS like:

    * NYTimes.com Terms of Service, paragraph 2.2: “The Service and its Contents are protected by copyright pursuant to U.S. and international copyright laws. You may not modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce (except as provided in Section 2.3 of these Terms of Service), create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Content or the Service (including software) in whole or in part.”

    becomes:
    You may not …..display,…..any of the Content….in whole or in part.

    which seems rather odd. Why bother to have electronic information if you cannot legally display it so it can be read? Or did I miss the meaning? Maybe “You” does not mean me; maybe “display” does not mean arrange pixels on a screen into readable letters; “Content” seems clear, since it's capitalized; in whole or in part kind of covers it all.

    Too many lawyers, too much idle time.

  • chromeronin

    So their gripe was that the times RSS feeds were included by default, you know, actually driving users to their site?
    Oh well, NYT just got removed from my feeds, and I never want to see them again. Go NYT!!

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/KZJMREDJDS4UJWQAIW7SE4L7ZQ Ronnie

    Actually iPad is an awesome eReader..i find way more comfortable to my eyes

  • http://www.cryptavault.com Paul Wilson

    What a shame. Why can’t these rights issues be sorted out in a way that doesn’t stifle competition or cause stop/go in product release schedules?
    ____________________
    Moderated by CryptaVault

  • http://www.marblecleaningmiami.com/fl-marble-floor-cleaning-coral-gables.html marble polishing coral gables

    Wow. You are such a genius for figuring that out. Thanks.

  • http://www.terrazzocleaning.net Terrazzo Floor Care HOLLYWOOD

    In an unusual coincidence, the Times Web site was on prominent display on a huge screenshot of the iPad during Jobs’s speech.

  • http://www.terrazzocleaning.net Terrazzo Repair

    You add feeds to it and it visualizes them in a way that’s easy to get through.

  • http://www.terrazzorestoration.net Terrazzo Repairing

    You add feeds to it and it visualizes them in a way that’s easy to get through.

  • http://www.terrazzofloorrestoration.net Terrazzo Floor Repair

    Wow! Thank you! I always wanted to write on my blog something like that. Can I take a portion of your post to my site?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Thomas-Mc/100001605142837 Thomas Mc

    I quit reading the NYT anyway, because of their arrogant attitude. They treat their readers like they are the enemy.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

While it’s tempting to see the Huffington Post’s Pulitzer as a “big win for new media,” or something like that, the real story is that these organizations — the Huffington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post — are becoming more like each other. Old media and new media are increasingly antiquated terms.

— Journalism professor Jay Rosen to HuffPo media writer Michael Calderone (via GigaOM)