Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

What to Make of the Microsoft-Is-Falling-And-It-Can't-Get-Up Meme

Oh dear, here it comes round again, like a bout of the flu–the indefatigable narrative about how Microsoft is headed downhill at an alarming speed, how CEO Steve Ballmer is about to get the boot and how it is all really, really true since the echo chamber of tech keeps repeating it.

Over the past two weeks, for example, I have gotten numerous “tips” that all these things are about to happen. Except when I go to check them out by doing some actual reporting, they turn out to be more chatter than reality, more barstool musing than concrete, and without much in the way of those pesky facts.

Today, we get yet another from the Olympic champion of traffic-goosing headlines on blogs, Henry Blodget of Silicon Alley Insider, in what is quite a humdinger of a title: “The Odds Are Increasing That Microsoft’s Business Will Collapse.”

Holy Guacamole! Really?

You mean the Microsoft that still–despite all the Google Apps machinations–has a hammerlock on the enterprise software market? The company with a badillion dollars in cash in the bank? The one that can lose more than $700 million in its Online Services division and not blink an eye?

Actually, the headline is the most exciting part of the whole article that follows, which hedges mightily as it also dredges up old news about Microsoft’s business challenges.

The short version: The Internet is everything that’s not good for Microsoft; Apple (AAPL) is rocking the mobile market; Google (GOOG) is disrupting all over the place; and, natch, the oncoming cloud-computing incursion is worse than the Smoke Monster from “Lost” for Microsoft’s cash-generating Windows and Office businesses.

All true in a very broad-brush way. But, of course, Blodget pulls a complete on-one-hand-on-the-other at the end, although he cannot resist a final over-the-top statement:

Right now, the investors are concluding that Microsoft will gradually become the equivalent of a technology utility–a boring but necessary provider of the software that runs the world’s business community. A smaller, more optimistic crowd is still arguing that, one day, Microsoft will be able to turn its fortunes around, and fight its way back into an industry leadership position.

What almost no one is talking about is a third possibility, one that becomes more likely by the day: The possibility that, a couple of years down the road, Microsoft’s business may just completely collapse.

Here’s the simple and less flashy situation:

Microsoft, as all tech companies do, needs to change, and a lot faster than it has so far; the company has been trying mightily to do so in search and recently, in mobile, where it is woefully far behind; its leadership under Ballmer, who took over from co-founder Bill Gates, has been meh enough to keep its stock moribund.

But, by no means recently–even if there is a better CEO for Microsoft out there than Ballmer–have I found the company execs ignorant about the tougher issues or unwilling to consider changes needed.

In fact, in its high-flying days, Microsoft did have a tin ear to criticism. No longer, and I would call its execs appropriately concerned about fixing its issues, although their efforts do suffer from the company’s massive size and inertia in making the right moves.

Thus, they certainly might not be successful at innovating, although these are the very kinds of problems Apple CEO Steve Jobs solved when he returned to a rotten company in what, in its current glory days, seems eons ago.

And Microsoft has been getting the same questions that are beginning to be asked about Google.

But can you imagine anyone not mocking a likely headline-to-come about the search giant: “Search: If That’s All There Is, My Friend, Then Let’s Keep Surfing (to Oblivion!)”?

That’s why–at this point–I can see no need for panic to set in about Microsoft. Next year, perhaps. Five years, with no change and not listening to the obvious, definitely.

As for today, even though we are all terminal, the sky looks like it will remain intact at Microsoft for a little bit longer.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    Silicon Alley Insider has lost all objectivity when it comes to Apple in terms of they can do no wrong. They should rightfully be ignored as nothing more than an attention seeking blog. Microsoft is in trouble and their lapses in mobile and online losses are inexcusable. Why the board has not replaced Ballmer is anyone’s guess but they are still the industry leader and their death is greatly exaggerated.

  • disposableidentity

    Any company that can loose $700 million in one small division (never mind the billions they've lost on “successful” product lines like xbox) is, by definition, in trouble.

  • disposableidentity

    Any company that can loose $700 million in one small division (never mind the billions they've lost on “successful” product lines like xbox) is, by definition, in trouble.

  • WebUser

    It's been years. First time I read stuff like Henry Blodget wrote, I was lost. Second time I don't even bother to look at the article anymore. Then I start to laugh. Then I start to get angry. I have a question: why those people are so passionately writting things like that? I can only find things that apply: a moron or a fraud. I pick the second. Since technology transistion happens since technology existed. I don't say ever so often that those people write article against any tech firm like that. Look at the title, even though what he said is true, and imgine that's truely his opinion, people would be careful writting things like that.

    The thing is regardless where what said is true, the word is out, and he (or they) is a writer with certain status, and it is published in respectable place. People (including investors) will believe. I think that's all that matters to him.

    This is disrespectful behavior. I don't think that's the thing that any journalist (or blogger) should follow. It is disgrace to his career.

  • http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/ Tom Foremski

    Bill Gates decided it was easier to try and save the world than try to save Microsoft. But, yes, MSFT isn't going away anytime soon. Blodget's link baiting is tiresome.

  • digiprod

    Xerox thought they were doing fine also!

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    The point was, they did that, and still made 10 billion in profit during the financial crisis.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    Yes, and they're the same frauds that work over at Apple computer, particularly one named Steve.

  • marksashton

    Good post Kara. Blodget's the sky is falling blogging is good for enticing links which is, I'm sure, the true inspiration behind his posting. The reality is quite different. I won't even get into the doom and gloom speculation about Office and Windows collapsing except to say that there are a billion PC's running Windows and Office software and even if the world decided today to change to…something…it would take 10-15 years go make a serious dent in Microsoft's business. In the meantime they sell another couple of hundred billions dollars in Windows and Office.

    What people forget is that Microsoft has a number of other software businesses that would be among the largest software companies in the world if they were independent. Anyone heard of Exchange? I'm sure it's a $1 billion + business. Maybe $2 billion +. Anyone heard of SharePoint? SharePoint is a $1 billion + business. SQL? Same story. Yes, Windows and Office do provide the lionshare of Microsoft's profits but they're much more diversified than…say…Google which is a one-trick pony.

    I have been around this industry for nearly 20 years and it seems that people have been predicting the demise of one old guard company or another the entire time. From what I can tell, Microsoft is the one old guard company that seems to be doing quite well. Their competitors? Novell? Lotus? WordPerfect? Not so much.

  • marksashton

    Xerox didn't have multiple $1 billion + businesses. They had one. Microsoft has at least 6 or 6 $1 billion + businesses. Big difference.

  • digiprod

    And which one of Microsoft's business will doing well into the future? Any guesses? Office and Windows? Servers? Smartphones? Search? As shown their main profits have been Office and Windows after all the HUGE investments in all the other businesses, they are still not even close to the leader in!

  • marksashton

    Umm….not really. Exchange is the #1 email/calenaring server but a huge margin…probably close to 80% share and very profitable. SharePoint is the #1 product in its category. SQL Server is #2 in the DB category after Oracle. I could go on.

    Besides, show me one good reason to think that the Windows and Office profits are going to somehow disappear? Google Apps? Give me a break. A neat experiment by Google to try to diversify beyond the one successful business that they have today. Most Google Apps users are also using Office. ChromeOS? Riiiight. As long as you don't want to install software or print it'll be great.

  • pablofaja

    Apple beat MSFT in valuation and Google will be next. Just b/c you been in the industry a long time does mean can accurately predict the future. Things change. If Microsoft doesn't adapt it will fail.

  • digiprod

    Time will tell! Since Mobile devices is the biggest growth area it seems like Microsoft is not a player. Mostly what you mentioned below are business tools only. You may be quite surprised. Microsoft no longer has a monopoly as the desktop will be less relevant going forward.

  • digiprod

    I agree completely. Only a MS fanboy could disagree with these facts.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    Go back to your apple funded hole in the ground you third world POS spam bot.

  • disposableidentity

    No doubt they'll continue to make large amounts of money even while they're getting a declining share of their declining markets.

    As an investor I wouldn't touch it.

  • http://www.marketingtactics.com/ davebarnes

    In 1990, no one was predicting the fall of DEC. In 1997, DEC ceased to exist.
    In 1990, DEC was profitable with multiple product/service offerings.

  • johnmullinax

    This is a really good point! Change is part of the tech industry. And long term success in the tech industry requires that companies can keep up, and in some areas, lead that change. That said, the ability to change is actually one of the reasons I'm optimistic about Microsoft's future.

    The company has shown a remarkable ability to adapt it's business over the years, and that appears to be continuing. For example: XBOX 360 Kinect, Windows Azure cloud, Office Web Apps, the forthcoming Windows Phone 7, IE9, Bing, etc.

    Time will tell how successful each product/service is, but clearly the company is not sitting still, and there is some very interesting innovation in each of these areas.

  • digiprod

    You are right and we all know history likes to repeat itself. Ignoring the signs is not to good for predicting the future.

  • digiprod

    Funny you mention mostly all the unprofitable stuff that is paid for from Windows-Office sales where Microsoft is not the leader in! Remarkable with all the money spent and huge lead times Microsoft has continued to not execute in the market.

  • WebUser

    the same applies to any companies, including apple and google. the point is can't bluntly predict something without reasoning. more importantly, you can't write article to any firm in a disrepectful manner like that. With disregarding the fact that msft is still making the most of profit. And I don't think anyone will do that any time soon. If talk about cllapse, google will have better chance at the moment. There two arguments that people always mentioned, cloud and mobile. Lets see, didn't msft just released Azure and cloud services. And don't you think that msft is the only one that can cloud work? Let's see mobile, msft just redesigned Windows mobile, and abondoned the old one. it's market is sure to go low, that's something we already know like a year ago. And don't you think things will be different by the end of the year? If they don't anything terribly wrong, WP7 should be #1 next year.

    If any tech company will cllapse, google will be top the list. Apple will the second. msft is nowhere.

  • johnmullinax

    Well, I did indeed choose those products intentionaly — others have already mentioned a number of other products beyond Windows and Office on the desktop where Microsoft is strong. The company has done a lot to diversify it's revenue streams, but it's true that most profits continue to come from Windows and Office. This more a testament to the inherent strength of those business areas than it is an indictment of the company's innovation in other quarters.

    That said, i chose the technologies above precisely because they are *not* areas that Microsoft has lead in recently or been most profitable. The metapoint here is that Microsoft's moves in these areas show the company is adapting and may very well yet become a leader in some of them.

    Personally, I'm bullish on Microsoft's Windows Azure cloud platform, but also Kinect… and it's too soon to say how the Windows Phone 7 product will do, but I'm optimistic there, too.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    You must be a really good investor.

  • res08hao

    That was a very well reasoned argument and I agree with you. I do believe that Ballmer is the worst company president on the planet.

  • http://www.ratdiary.com spragued

    Oh dear, you're not seriously taking Henry seriously are you? Rather than spend graphs refuting his thesis your (and our) time would've been better spent examining the pageview-based business model that he has embraced which depends on tabloid-style posts.

  • JohnDoey

    The problem at Microsoft is the money is not coming from new customers showing up with a problem and cash in hand and going away happy with a solution. Instead, it's the other way around: Microsoft shows up and says “it's 2010, so you have to pay $X to keep using these 3 components, and we're no longer supporting these other 3 components so you'll have to upgrade them and 1 of them only runs on 64-bit Windows 7 Server so you'll have to get that, too,” and they are essentially just milking their existing customers who are all trying to keep the status quo but are being forced to at least pay for upgrades, which in some cases they don't even use. The word “downgrade” has been coined since Vista, which means paying for the new version but continuing to use the old one. The customers are ready to jump onto a new platform. Companies that used to be all-Microsoft shops have Blackberry and iPhone now. They want interoperability which is why Exchange is in demand and Windows 7 is not. All the other tech companies are based on Unix, and so is the Internet. Everyone else is using the Internet to their advantage, while Microsoft's stuff can't even stay up when connected to the Internet, it gets hijacked by a botnet.

    It's like Microsoft is the only manufacturer of DVD Players in 2002. Man, that is a good business. But even in 2002 we knew that optical discs were not the ultimate answer to moving video around.

    The other day at this company where I consult, I watched 2 I-T guys spend the entire day (16 man hours) setting up a Windows XP PC with Office 2003 for a new executive, troubleshooting the wired network and running anti-virus scanners and setting up Outlook with various add-ons. Then the executive showed up with her own iPad and logged into Exchange and she doesn't touch the PC. It's like a landlord hiring 2 guys to spend a day wiring up a house with landline jacks and the tenant comes in with a mobile phone and doesn't want to even connect the landline. Microsoft is like a phone company with no mobile arm, they have landlines only.

    So Blodgett's post is a little shrill, but there really is a big problem at Microsoft.

  • disposableidentity

    @Shawn, ten years ago I avoided buying MS (down 20%) and bought Apple instead (up 2200%).

    Microsoft is making a lot of money, but that doesn't mean the shares will go up. In fact in Microsoft's case (no product lines with potential for substantial growth), it's almost certain they won't.

    That's the funny thing about the stock market. “Today” is already factored in — it's all about what “Tomorrow” will bring. Apple's positioned to take advantage of “tomorrow” MS isn't.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Facebook bought the thing that is hardest to fake. It bought sincerity.

— Paul Ford, writing about FaceTagram in New York Magazine