Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Microsoft Comms Head Smacks Back by the Numbers (Plus a "Rocky"-Inspired Internal Email!)

After what he considered weeks of unfair press coverage and running down of Microsoft (MSFT), the software giant’s Corporate VP of Corporate Communications, Frank Shaw, posted a pugnacious corporate blog entry today that trotted out some impressive numbers about Microsoft’s business.

Of course, he also took the opportunity to put up some not-so-much figures about competitors such as Apple (AAPL), Netflix (NFLX), Salesforce.com (CRM) and, of course, Google (GOOG).

My favorite dig is the stat on the “percent chance that Salesforce.com CEO [Marc Benioff] will mention Microsoft in a speech, panel, interview, or blog post.” The answer, natch: 100!

As it turns out, that was a follow-up to a very sharply worded letter Shaw sent out to communications teams across Microsoft (MSFT) earlier this month, obtained by BoomTown, in which he noted at the start:

“It has been a rough couple of weeks for us from a coverage standpoint. It seems like every time I turn on the computer, or talk to a reporter, or pick up a publication at home, or do a scan of my RSS feeds or Twitter client that I see more stories and opinions about the challenges we have, and how great some of our competitors are doing. iPad this, Droid that, sheesh.”

Sheesh? Who says that anymore?

Still, I like his gumption in using it! Thus, Shaw–who is an active blogger and Twitter poster–is apparently mad as heck and not going to take it anymore!

Here’s the blog post below, followed by the internal email Shaw sent (apparently inspired by the landscape at our eighth D: All Things Digital conference earlier this month):

Microsoft by the numbers

25 Jun 2010 12:30 PM

You probably saw the news this week that we’ve sold 150 million Windows 7 licenses in 8 months. That’s more than 600,000 per day. And, perhaps fittingly for a product called Windows 7, it adds up to 7 copies every second of every day since launch.

As a communications guy, I’m generally most comfortable with words. But since Microsoft is a pretty numbers-driven company, the Windows 7 milestone got me thinking about some *other* numbers, too.

Of course, numbers are only one dimension of a story. And we live in a hyper-competitive industry, with loads of challenges to go along with loads of opportunity. All the same, with Windows 7, Office 2010, Bing, Xbox 360, Kinect, Windows Phone 7, our cloud platform, and many other products, services and happy customers, 2010 is shaping up as a huge year for us.

So, without further ado, a few of my favorite numbers:

1

150,000,000
Number of Windows 7 licenses sold, making Windows 7 by far the fastest growing operating system in history.[source]

2

7.1 million
Projected iPad sales for 2010. [source]

58 million
Projected netbook sales in 2010. [source]

355 million
Projected PC sales in 2010. [source]

3

>10
Percentage of US netbooks running Windows in 2008. [source]

96
Percentage of US netbooks running Windows in 2009. [source]

4

0
Number of paying customers running on Windows Azure in November 2009.

10,000
Number of paying customers running on Windows Azure in June 2010. [source]

700,000
Number of students, teachers and staff using Microsoft’s cloud productivity tools in Kentucky public schools, the largest cloud deployment in the US. [source]

5

16 million
Total subscribers to largest 25 US daily newspapers. [source]

14 Million
Total number of Netflix subscribers. [source]

23 million
Total number of Xbox Live subscribers. [source]

6

9,000,000
Number of customer downloads of the Office 2010 beta prior to launch, the largest Microsoft beta program in history. [source]

7

21.4 million
Number of new Bing search users in one year. [Comscore report--requires subscription]

8

24%
Linux Server market share in 2005. [source]

33%
Predicted Linux Server market share for 2007 (made in 2005). [source]

21.2%
Actual Linux Server market share, Q4 2009. [source]

9

8.8 million
Global iPhone sales in Q1 2010. [source]

21.5 million
Nokia smartphone sales in Q1 2010. [source]

55 million
Total smartphone sales globally in Q1 2010. [source]

439 million
Projected global smartphone sales in 2014. [source]

10

9
Number of years it took Salesforce.com to reach 1 million paid user milestone. [source]

6
Number of years it took Microsoft Dynamics to reach 1 million paid user milestone. [source]

100%
Percent chance that Salesforce.com CEO will mention Microsoft in a speech, panel, interview, or blog post.

11

173 million
Global Gmail users. [source]

284 million
Global Yahoo! Mail users.[source]

360 million
Global Windows Live Mail users.[source]

299 million
Active Windows Live Messenger Accounts worldwide. [Comscore MyMetrix, WW, March 2010--requires subscription]

1
Rank of Windows Live Messenger globally compared to all other instant messaging services. [Comscore MyMetrix, WW, March 2010 - requires subscription]

12

$5.7 Billion
Apple Net income for fiscal year ending Sep 2009. [source]

$6.5 Billion
Google Net income for fiscal year ending Dec 2009. [source]

$14.5 Billion
Microsoft Net Income for fiscal year ending June 2009. [source]

$23.0 billion
Total Microsoft revenue, FY2000. [source]

$58.4 billion
Total Microsoft revenue, FY2009. [source]

fxs

It has been a rough couple of weeks for us from a coverage standpoint. It seems like every time I turn on the computer, or talk to a reporter, or pick up a publication at home, or do a scan of my RSS feeds or Twitter client that I see more stories and opinions about the challenges we have, and how great some of our competitors are doing. iPad this, Droid that, sheesh. Even BusinessWeek got into the act, taking some unfair shots at Natal under the guise of looking at our consumer strategy all up. Man, when someone is beating on Natal prior to E3, you can bet we’ve got momentum against us.

Sitting there at the All Things Digital conference last week and hearing from our competitors really got me thinking, though. What is our differentiation? Why do we make certain decisions? What drives the way we think about business and technology? The morning after the Steve Jobs q&a (which everyone should watch), I dragged myself out of bed to go for a run. As I’d driven into the hotel, I noticed with a sinking feeling that there were lots of hills. I asked the desk clerk if they had a jogging map. They did not. I asked if he could point me a direction that did not have a bunch of hills. He laughed and pointed “up” the driveway and said that if I turned left there would be a nice running path. “I drove in that direction,” I said. “Seems like it’s uphill.” He shrugged, and away I went. Up.

And to keep my mind off the elevation gain, I was thinking about that previous question–what drives Microsoft? Coming up the second hill, I got it. Fundamentally, we believe that we have the opportunity to make life better for billions of people around the world through our products and services. Not millions, not tens of millions, but billions. We started with the idea of a computer on every desktop, and even though the computer looks a lot different today than it did those years, and even though the developed world probably does have a computer on every desk, there are still billions more to go, and we are going to get there. And when you start thinking about serving billions, which we do, we’re playing a game that nobody else in the industry is. I don’t know about you, but I come to work thinking about what I can do to help w/ that big goal. And it’s not all altruism and unicorns, when we do a great job of creating products that make life better for billions, it makes us better as a company, we sell more, we learn more, our partners do better, we do better. And when you have big dreams and big ambitions (like we do) and when you set the bar high (which we do) then sometimes we don’t get over the bar. There are people in the world that see that and call it failure; but failing to hit the mark doesn’t mean quitting. That’s part of our culture, too.

The run back to the hotel was easier. I even scrambled up a bluff next to the path (imagining the theme to “Rocky” in my head) and stood looking out over the Pacific for a bit. And I thought about our challenges, internal and external. External is easy. Internal is harder.

There is a saying I’ve heard a bunch since I’ve been at Microsoft: “Hope is not a strategy.” Heck, I’ve used it myself, and felt pretty superior while saying it, since I was talking about something I didn’t really own. But standing on the bluff, I wondered.

In my last mail, I referenced the need for us all to be comfortable in the gap between what is and what we desire to create. If we simply live in what we have, we become cynics. And if hope is not a strategy, then neither is cynicism, and we have lots of cynics among us. It is a challenge, especially for those of us who help tell our story. I often see it used, and use it myself, to cover up the pain of not meeting a goal, or seeing a product/service be ill-received by the market. If I am able to mock and sneer, then nobody outside the company can make me feel worse at setbacks and even failures.

As the evangelists for the company, we must guard against this. Hope can’t be a strategy, but it (and its cousin belief) is a needed ingredient in any success. Think about this for a bit. Each and every one of us needs to be grounded in our challenges and our wins. Right now, we are massively over-indexed in thinking and knowing about our losses and challenges. But what of our wins?

At the conference later that day, I had a chance to engage in a spirited and mostly friendly discussion with some folks who thought we were doing a crap job all up. Stock price flat, no iPad, etc. Instead of shrugging and agreeing, I talked about our wins and our momentum. We’ve built a huge server business over the last decade, something else nobody has done. Windows 7 sales are up about 39 percent year over year, against a huge base. Office 2010 beta largest ever, Office is in the cloud. Bing is one year old, 4 points of market share–nobody has grown search market share against Google but we are doing it. They are copying our look, our home page. New Hotmail is driving them to offer something other than threaded email for Gmail. Xbox Live has 23 million users–again, only two companies in the last decade have built subscription services like this (Netflix is the other). Windows Azure has 10,000 paying customers, we just announced 700k deployment of live@edu, probably the largest cloud deployment in the world. Natal is coming, it’s cool. Yes, we want to (and will) do better in phones. Yes, we want to (and will) have more cool thin slate/tablet/other form factor devices that run Windows. I’ll tell you, while I don’t think I created any true believers, I did force people to think differently about Microsoft and what we’re doing, and I call that a win.

This is our job. We don’t just represent the products and services we work on, we represent the company all up. Be ready to tell that story. Tell it to your co-workers here at Microsoft, to your family and friends, to members of the media. They know about our challenges, they don’t know about our wins and momentum. So tell them.

fxs


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://plurk.com/avatar Avatar X

    Awesome post. the E-mail gives it a better punch to it. I kinda hope that they had put it just like that in The Officia Microsoft Blog.

  • JohnDoey

    13)

    5,840,000
    Projected new Windows 7 -compatible malware titles for 2010.

    88%
    Percentage of Fortune 500 companies infected by the Zeus botnet.

    90%
    Percentage of spam email sent by Windows botnets according to Sophos.

    $10
    Hourly cost to rent the use of a small Windows botnet set up to make attacks on online banking.

    $7
    Cost to purchase a full package of Windows botnet-collected data on one Windows user for use in identity theft or similar criminal activity.

    $0.50
    Average cost per Windows system when purchasing a botnet.

    14)

    75%
    Percentage of Windows systems running XP.

    9
    Age in years of Windows XP on August 24, 2010.

    33%
    Percentage of Windows systems running a bootleg (aka pirate) version of the operating system.

    90%
    Percentage of Windows systems in mainland China running a bootleg (aka pirate) version of the operating system.

    14)

    86%
    Netflix' American Customer Satisfaction Index score, which leads online retailers.

    85%
    Apple's American Customer Satisfaction Index score, which leads personal computer makers.

    15)

    1,000,000
    Total Microsoft TabletPC sold over the almost 10 year life of the product.

    1,000,000
    iPads sold in the first month of limited availability in the US only.

    16)

    100,000,000
    Total installed base of gaming consoles, mid-2010 (XBox + PlayStation + Wii)

    100,000,000
    Total installed base of Apple iOS devices, mid-2010 (iPhone + iPod touch + iPad)

    17)

    20th
    Last century in which Microsoft mattered at all.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    Great post, Microsoft is a great company, and those are very impressive numbers, but they NEED to innovate…

    Right now Microsoft is playing copy cat way too much. Apple makes waves with the iPad, then MS trots a Zune. Sony makes billions on the PS2, so they trot out the XBOX. Nintendo redefines the game controller with the Wii, so they trot out project 'Natal'. The smartphone market starts to take off so they finally trot out Windows Mobile 7. Adobe gets Flash on close to 98% of computers so they trot out Silverlight….etc

    Microsoft has done an amazing job with the number of markets that they compete strongly in, but they're going to relegate themselves to a mundane position in the public consciousness if they can't make waves once in awhile.

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    18)

    0
    Number of people who think JohnDoey's numbers reflect reality.

  • http://twitter.com/fxshaw Frank X. Shaw

    Innovation is always tricky to define and execute. I would say that Kinect counts as innovation (no controller) in the same way that the wii did (wand). Both are built on the base of gaming. I would say (call me biased) that Xbox Live also counts as innovation — connected gaming didn't really exist before we did it. If “first” is the primary defintion of innovation, then the Wright brothers get credit but the person who did single wing, the person who did jets, the person who did choppers, too bad so sad. :) NB not challenging your assertion we need to innovate *more*. Just saying that things like Kinect, Azure etc most likely count at some level.

  • sdelete

    I feel bad for people like you that hate Microsoft I really do. When you work in the business world you need business tools and Microsoft makes great tools for business. When you deal with music and art you should use an Apple that’s what they are made for. Too bad all you Microsoft haters don’t get that all you want to do is drink the Apple flavored Kool-Aid and bash Microsoft you really need to get a life.

  • sdelete

    I feel bad for people like you that hate Microsoft I really do. When you work in the business world you need business tools and Microsoft makes great tools for business. When you deal with music and art you should use an Apple that’s what they are made for. Too bad all you Microsoft haters don’t get that all you want to do is drink the Apple flavored Kool-Aid and bash Microsoft you really need to get a life.

  • sdelete

    Yeah you right about Microsoft they never create anything first. They only made a tablet PC after Apple made their iPad. OOPS iPad came out in 2010 and the Tablet PC’s came out in 2001.
    So you condemn Microsoft for improving on concepts, that’s fine as long as you condemn Apple also. Well let’s start on some bashing.
    Let’s start with portable music players.
    The first was Sony with their Walkman in 1978.
    The first MP3 player was Saehan's MPMan in 1998.
    Apple came out with the iPod in 2002 I guess using your logic Apple should have not made them??
    Next let’s look at Tablet PC’s
    The first main stream Tablet PC OS was written by Microsoft in 2001.
    In 2007 Axiotron heavily modified Apple MacBook called Modbook, a Mac OS X-based tablet computer with third-party software to get a pen to work.
    Now in 2010 Apple comes out with the iPad with a phone OP and wants everyone to think they made the first tablet.
    I feel bad for people like you that hate Microsoft I really do. You may think I hate Apple I don’t not at all you should use the right tool for the right job. Microsoft makes a lot of great products and the made some bad ones as well. Apple is the same way they are mot perfect in any way at all but so many of you Apple lovers think that Apple is perfect and Microsoft is the devil all I have to say to you is; Have some more of the Apple flavored Kool-Aid its good for you.

    Oh to Shawn_The_Bohn people who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

  • http://twitter.com/tweetzi1 tweetzi1

    funny, We used to get similar email @ yahoo over the last two years while I worked over there

  • rblevin

    Great PR. And worth contemplating. But it only covers half the story: the half that makes things look rosey for Microsoft today. He fails to cite the trends. For example, where will the iPad (plus Android tablets) be in 5 years relative to netbook sales? And yes, iPhones trail in terms of unit sales today, but Nokia's share is declining, while Apple's and Android's are growing (and he doesn't mention Android at all).

  • http://twitter.com/fxshaw Frank X. Shaw

    might be worth looking at reviews and comparisons of Office 2010 web apps v. google aps. Pretty sure that the overall view is pretty darn good..better document fidelity, more functionality, etc. And Thursday was the latest preview of ie9, which also got some pretty good buzz and pop. Just sayin'. Lots of competition out there for sure, but credit where credit due, eh?

  • Shawn_The_Bohn

    I don't hate Microsoft. I like Microsoft. You are not hearing my point. Microsoft does innovate, they just haven't done anything that was so innovative it redefined an entire experience. I personally like Windows 7, but it's just well executed, not a redefining experience. I prefer it over OSX but it's far from being a situation where it's leaps and bounds beyond its competitors.

  • Anonymous

    Great post and great discussion. Look at the bright side. Few years ago we hear only MS bashing everywhere tech community gathers. Nowadays, there are more and more people defending MS and bashing Apple instead.

  • eldernorm

    So sdelete, its much better to love Microsoft, the company that has said over and over that its goal is to “monetize” its products… i.e. sell them. Yep that is love alright.

    Just a thought there,
    en

  • eldernorm

    sdelete, how about taking a breath here. Your Microsoft love is blinding you to reality… or the money you get by trolling…. (just a thought)

    Just a thought, Apple has not developed the “wheel” but they figured out how to make it sell. And if having the first craptastic tablet is the greatest, then the 2 million iPads sold in 80 days must have been a major mistake.

    Its not really just marketing….. unless you are talking about the Microsoft machine.

    en

  • idby

    That is comparing apples to oranges. Microsoft office is a mature application that must be installed. Google apps is a newer web based application that is constantly adding new features. One is good for single users who create lots of documents and dont care about the price. The other is for those that want to create a few documents for no cost and possibly collaborate on the creation of the document.
    Next lets look at the comment about the documents look better. Both applications can create .docx files, which should be created following a clearly defined open specification. But wait a second, the company that pushed for that specification changes things all the time and does not follow its own specification. The real problem is that the documents don't look exactly alike, but the failing isn't on the rest of the world, but the company that proposed the file format in the first place because it doesn't even follow its own specifications.
    Dont even get me started on th bloatware that is IE. The browser that was stagnant until competition showed up and is now loosing place, heck the only reason it has the place it does have is the fact that the convicted monopoly that bought the application in the first place gave it away and used its monopoly in one area to create an illegal monopoly in another. Thanks to the EU and not the USA for finally doing something about it.
    Perhaps a few more billions in anti trust fines from the EU will make Microsoft innovate, because every time I read or hear it come out of someone at Microsoft it sounds like a politician saying my taxes will not go up.

  • dirknn

    Well, for a company that has two monopoly's, home computing en administrative computing, is using these monopoly's to give the impression to the broader audience that it is the only real option in computing and probably needs those monopoly's for its business model, anyway did big efforts to keep those, are that such good numbers?
    Revenue set aside.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/LMHSUFVEKDCRGEBM3ZUEJR3P4I spuluka

    The windows 7 sales numbers are a phantom in two respects.

    1-They hid a huge number of corporate deploys that are actually XP installs. We have purchased hundreds of Win7 licenses since launch but only a hand full are actually Win7 deploys. We use our downgrade rights to continue to deploy windows XP on the desktop. And I find this is the majority of corporate deploys from all my colleagues. Thus the Win7 sales number is inflated.

    2-Consumers have little choice personally it is being made by the manufacturer. Currently MS is doing a great job in keeping those manufacturers happy and locked in to automatically load win7 as shipping os. But if they fail to respond to what the tech press is telling them about innovation and the need to change that may change. This is fundamentally their challenge that they still just don't want to talk about.

    Steve
    MCP Managing Sever 2003

  • Dzipi

    Your company bought those licences, but decides not to deploy them probably in favor of “saving money” and keeping backward compatibility to a 10 year old OS and somehow Microsoft is deceiving people? Seriously?
    Not using a modern day OS is definitely not something an IT guy would do, but since you brought it up, if allowed which decade old OS would you deploy rather than XP to your environonment today? Serious question: Which OS would you deploy/buy rather than Windows 7 if you were allowed to? Why?

  • http://www.erikflorida.com/ eflorida

    Do you even know what Office 2010 Web Apps is? You are the one comparing apples to oranges, because you don't know about the products you are commenting on. The Web Apps portion of Office are cloud-based versions of the applications that run through your browser – it competes directly with Google Docs.

    Also, notice he didn't talk about how fantastic IE7 is. He mentioned that the latest version, IE9, has been getting great reviews. In a comparison test I saw somewhere online, it beat out FireFox and Safari, and even held its own against Chrome. Sounds like progress.

    As far as committing to and following open standards, I agree Microsoft could do far better. They are in a powerful position in the industry and they could use that power for the greater good by simply following standards.

    In general, I think his letter was great, but anyone who is going to post angry comments here about how it didn't cover the whole story, or the negative areas of their business…did you read the letter?! The letter was about bringing focus and attention to their successes and building on that towards an even more successful future. It is not productive for them to beat a dead horse. Everyone knows Windows CE was a failure, but look at XBox Live, and look at Windows 7. Now let's move forward and hope Microsoft can deliver again.

  • GreyGeek77

    Actually, your count for 18) is wrong. I'd believe JohnDoey's numbers before I'd believe Shaw's numbers. So, if you are wrong about that it is more than likely you are wrong in other assumptions as well.

    What I wonder is how many Windows “fanboys” posting to this and similar MS PR pieces are actually MS “Technical Evangelists” (of the James Plamondon type) trained and paid to flood forums and blogs with PRO MS postings and attacks against anyone preferring non MS products?
    http://platformevangelism.spac.....og/…

  • http://techniner.pip.verisignlabs.com/ t9

    '''…Not using a modern day OS is definitely not something an IT guy would do…'''

    eh.. huh?.. LOL.. Not clear what IT dept professional vertical networking groups you 'assume earned representation' on behalf of guv.. but… Please share your sources of such a broad implication of “definitely not something an IT guy would do” please..

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/2IIGUL6TRECCWP7BNBRKNICFNU BillH

    So keeping an OS that works with all your legacy apps (which would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to migrate) is a bad thing? Right. Being an IT guy has nothing to do with business decisions.

  • http://twitter.com/mrguitarmann Tom Mann

    You forgot:

    18) Knowing that MIcrosoft talk out of their backsides? PRICELESS!

  • http://twitter.com/mrguitarmann Tom Mann

    Cause when you upgrade to a new MS product, you generally have to upgrade most of your servers too. MS Outlook 2007? Not on Exchange 2000. Win7? They screwed with the network sharing protocol to make it a pain.
    Incompatibility = more sales

  • Dzipi

    Extremly bad wording from my side, I admit. I meant for personal use. And yes that was an assumption. My point was that OSs from today can't be compared with something from 10 years ago. I understand bussines reasons in deciding not to upgrade. My point was that MS is not trying to hide anything here…

  • Dzipi

    I was not advocating the upgrade, just the fact that MS is not “creating” phantom sales or hiding something.
    Is there a non-MS solution that would not cause a complete rehaul of everything?

  • Dzipi

    Read my reply to t9…I apologize for not being clear.I would argue that after a certain point investing in upgrading infrastructure (MS or non-MS) is a good thing won't you agree? Cost of upgrade is large, but what are the costs of maintainance? The problem is that results of such a move probably take years to show up….so bussineses keep beeding money slowly? To make it clear: I am asking, I dont know :)

  • eckenheimer

    “Serving billions” sounds more like McDonalds. So, if Microsoft deserves to be considered the best because it's the biggest, does that then mean that since it's also the biggest, Mickey D's is the world's best restaurant?

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

As long as the newspaper was a bundle, no one ever had to care that people were buying it for radically different reasons. But once you go online, and people can unbundle things, where you can traffic directly to a story without going through the home page or any of the rest of it, suddenly what it — the individual choices made by individual readers come to matter a lot.

— – Clay Shirky, on NPR’s Talk of the Nation with Neal Conan