Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

E-Reader Race to Zero Speeds Up: Borders Cuts Prices on Kindle Killers You Probably Haven't Bought

You can see where this is headed: In June, the cheapest Kindle went for $259. One price cut and one product tweak later, Amazon’s (AMZN) entry level e-reader goes for $139.

Time to catch up, Kindle competitors that aren’t Apple (AAPL). Borders (BGP) is starting out by cutting the price of its flagship Kobo reader to $129, down from $149. And the super-low-end Aluratek Libre reader is now going for $99.99, down from $120.

Barnes & Noble’s (BKS) cheapest Nook, for the moment, is stuck at $149, but it’s hard to imagine that price sticking through Christmas.

Meanwhile, anyone have any sales data on any of these things? Amazon boasts that its new Kindles are its “fastest-selling ever.” And it declines, as always, to explain what that means in numerical terms. But I believe that’s as good as–or better than–Barnes & Noble, Borders, et al, which are even quieter about their sales.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    The cheaper the ereader, the more ebooks these companies will sell. Remember when cell phones were for making calls? The last cell phone I got, was free with a two year contract. I see the ereaders going to free with a contract to buy a certain number of ebooks within a year, or two. So basically Amazon, Barnes and Noble, and Border’s don’t care what the price is, they want the no cost business of selling ebooks.

  • http://twitter.com/samirsushah Samir Shah

    But, at present, they want to make money of the razors while they can as long as ebook readers are a novelty. Making money of the blades will go own at its own slower (relative) pace.

    No player (Amazon, Barnes and Noble and Borders) wants to force a paradigm shift, It is only a “think different” CEO Steve Jobs who forced a paradigm shift with iPad and reaped the rewards.

  • Anonymous

    What was the paradigm shift with the IPad? It is simply an aggregation of features available separately on other devices. Paradigm shifts involve a total change in ways of thinking and dealing with your reality, not in mass consumption of glamour devices.

    Sheesh

  • http://twitter.com/samirsushah Samir Shah

    I will not argue regarding your definition of paradigm shift but will give you my take.

    iPad is a paradigm shift because

    1) iPad gives us multitouch computing in a computer screen form factor, but still retaining the advantages of true mobility e.g. before the advent of iPad there were ebook readers like Microsoft Reader on PCs but they never took off. With iPad many ebook readers took off including iBooks, Kindle Reader etc.

    2) iPad uses a processor (ARM) that gives us a full computer experience at a price that can go much lower than a netbook or notebook can go. I am thinking of a $50 TABLET. Apple may not oblige, but others will.

    When PCs replaced minicomputers there was a pardigm shift. When tablets will replace PCs it is a paradigm shift.

    To you I say,
    “What was the paradigm shift with the PC over minicomputers? PC was simply an aggregation of features available separately on other devices.”

  • samirsshah

    Somewhat of a tangent but worth noting.

    When book->ebook paradigm shift is over (5 years, Nicholas Negroponte), the whole world will be reading an order of magnitude more books than today.

    IT IS THE SECOND GUTENBURG.

  • Anonymous

    I checked out the Kobo a couple months ago, liked the layout better than the nook. Haven’t had a chance to touch a Kindle. Downside to the kobo, no wireless option. I haven’t bought any e-reader, ran the math on how long it would take to recoup the money vs paper back. by then, a new even better e-reader will be out.

Dive Into Media

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

@digiphile @jayrosen_nyu that’s just silly. Closing a global business in reaction to single-issue national politics is foolish.

— Dick Costolo, via Twitter, in response to a tweet by Alex Howard wondering whether Twitter would participate in Wikipedia’s Jan. 18 SOPA blackout