Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

The New Twitter.com Is a "Consumption Environment." Translation: Twitter Is a (Reluctant) Media Company.

Twitter’s new Web site has lots of cool features and gizmos. But they’re all supposed to do one thing in particular: They’re meant to encourage you to spend more time on Twitter.com, where the company can show you some ads.

The Twitter folks don’t exactly present it that way, of course. I talked to CEO Evan Williams and COO Dick Costolo earlier today, and they both repeated the mantra that the new Twitter is supposed to reflect the fact that Twitter is a “consumption environment,” where it’s just fine to read (or watch videos or look at pictures) instead of write.

In Williams’s words: “We’re trying to get people to understand that they don’t have to tweet if they want to get value out of Twitter.”

Which is another way of saying that Twitter is a media company: It gives you cool stuff to look at, you pay attention to what it shows you, and it rents out some of your attention to advertisers.

And that’s the real parallel with Facebook here. Not that both have inline video in the timeline or other design similarities, but that both companies started out trying to avoid the advertising business, and that both of them have ended up embracing them.

Nothing wrong with that, of course!

Speaking of which, how are Twitter’s new ad products coming along? Just great, says Costolo, who told me about engagement rates that pushed into the “double digits” for some of the company’s “Promoted Tweets” – and single digits for most of them. Which is way, way higher than traditional Web ads.

And Costolo says Twitter’s “Promoted Trends” product has been able to “boost the conversation” around given Twitter topics by as much as 600 percent.

The informal feedback I’ve heard is that advertisers are quite comfortable with Promoted Trends, since they function much like conventional display ads. But less so with the Promoted Tweets, which are sort of like Google’s AdWords but not really–unlike Google (GOOG), Twitter has very little idea of what’s on your mind.

But we’ll see: Costolo says Twitter will start pushing out the paid tweet ads more aggressively in the next few months.

Here’s a brief chat I had with Costolo before Twitter’s press event this afternoon, where we talk about the new site’s new features, the company’s ad plans and the inevitable “what will TweetDeck think of this” questions. Apologies once again for the horrendous video, but at least this time I have an excuse. I managed to lose my Flipcam en route to Twitter’s headquarters, so this one was shot with the BlackBerry Tour’s limited camera:


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.danpatterson.com/ Dan Patterson

    Thanks for writing a hyperbole-free article, Peter. This is dead on:
    “They’re meant to encourage you to spend more time on Twitter.com, where the company can show you some ads.”

  • http://www.howardlindzon.com howardlindzon

    yep. right on peter.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Howard! Welcome back!

  • http://seekingalpha.com mickwe

    I’d like to see them now aggregate links from a user’s stream a la Twittertim.es and Paper.li – that, incorporating suggested lists, could help it become a mainstream media player.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, right when I thought tweet couldnt get no better.

    http://www.private-data.tk

  • Anonymous

    Very well done and succinct. I think you’re dead right that Twitter wants to be in the old-fashioned attention-renting business, just like TV. Here’s the problem (Twitter’s, not yours): Everyone keeps trying to jam the square peg of traditional advertising into the round hole of new media and, to be blunt, it ain’t working. Very few on Twitter, I am willing to bet, really want their attention rented and they will decline to participate, just as the DVR, web video and 1,000 channels of cable allows us all to decline to have our attention rented out by broadcasters. It isn’t that traditional advertising is dead, but the trends are against it. So why would Twitter or Facebook try to copy that old model? It’s clear that the new model involves using all platforms to create engaging content that people actually want to watch/read/hear. What’s Twitter’s approach to charging for that? Because that’s the business model that will make them a fortune.

  • http://twitter.com/scottleadingham Scott Leadingham

    Good stuff. Thanks. My comment is directed at the video, actually. That seems like really good sound quality for a smartphone video capture. Did you edit the sound and boost quality on the back end? If not, I’m very impressed with Blackberry Tour.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Glad you like! Video picture and sound are untouched.

  • http://www.famefoundry.com Charlotte Website Design

    Thank you for these insights. It’s interesting to note that in order to create a more enticing “consumption environment,” Twitter has followed the lead of Apple’s Ping and Google Instant by offering new features that promote discovery. This is clearly a trend we should all continue to follow closely.

  • Anonymous

    Oversimplifying it a bit. It’s unlike any media company before it in a number of ways, I’d say. And if sticking ads in front of people is their business plan, they are in trouble, unless you consider personalized, relevant information that is asked for an ad. I’m not sure I disagree with you, but words like media and ads will continue to be used when they no longer look anything like the things they described in the past. because of that, some folks get mislead. Newspapers across the country read your post and sit back and breathe easy. Phew! It’s still okay to be a media company and sell ads. Think again. Better be a little more innovative than that.

  • http://mytwittertoolbox.com David Perdew

    If Twitter builds out their site to support advertising revenue while engaging their audience, how is that different from any other startup venture. Our expectations for clients are so high that we demand a kitchen sink philosophy, where you incorporate everything you could possibly want in the hope that something catches on.

    Many startups can attest to the failure of that business model, so patient rollouts to differentiate the client in the marketplace seems nothing but logical to me, even if they took their time with analytics.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for the post + interview video! The quality was just fine, by the way. : )

    Seems like a relatively conservative approach to gaining revenue from Twitter, but at least now we are finally getting some concrete feedback regarding ‘where are they going to get their cash from – and how exactly?’

    I’ve been thinking about the “inevitable question” regarding services such as TweetDeck. Wonder whether it would be possible to effectively skip the ads using one of these services? So much for ‘renting attention then’… In any case, interesting times ahead for the mentioned affiliates Twitter has invested on!

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    I believe all of the Twitter clients will have the choice to run the ads and share revenue. Suppose it’s possible that one of them will use the idea of *not* showing ads as a competitive advantage…
    But then, the Twitter clients need the cash at least as badly as Twitter does, right?

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    I believe all of the Twitter clients will have the choice to run the ads and share revenue. Suppose it’s possible that one of them will use the idea of *not* showing ads as a competitive advantage…
    But then, the Twitter clients need the cash at least as badly as Twitter does, right?

  • Anonymous

    didn’t Twitter shut down it’s @earlybird daily deal thing?

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Arguing online is like wearing a sharkskin vest. You look like a jerk.

— Anil Dash, in Businessweek’s How To issue