Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Goodbye (Crummy) CAPTCHAs. Hello Ad Dollars?

Hate dealing with captchas–the squiggly, indecipherable text strings Web sites often force you to read and regurgitate for security reasons? Join the club. And pay attention to what Solve Media is trying to do.

The New York start-up isn’t getting rid of captchas, but it does promise to make them more tolerable: It says it can swap out the random, hard-to-read text with clear, concise English. And while it’s at it, it says it can turn captchas into revenue generators for publishers, by transforming them into ad units.

It’s a super-simple pitch, and if you see the ad units Solve Media is selling, it gets even easier to understand. So click the image to enlarge:

How can Solve’s easy-to-read English text defeat the bots and other evildoers that captchas are supposed to foil with their jabberwocky? Got me. I’ve got no way of verifying its claims, either.

But assuming it does work, CEO Ari Jacoby has an interesting product on his hands. He’s pitching it specifically to display advertisers and big brands that put a lot of money into TV spots but have a hard time doing much with click-per-action schemes offered by Google’s (GOOG) AdWords and others.

The idea is that Jacoby’s ads require users to engage with them, by typing in the names of brands and products. But they don’t do anything beyond that–they don’t trigger a video, or take you to another Web site or anything else. It’s sort of like sitting on your couch and uttering “Outback” every time a Subaru spot comes on.

Jacoby claims his “type-in” ads will increase Web surfers’ recall of the ads, for the same reason that writing anything down makes it easier to remember.

That’s much more valuable than taking users to a branded minisite, he argues. “If we can deliver the cognitive payload up front, then we don’t need to deliver the users to a site that they don’t really want to go to anyway.”

And Jacoby thinks advertisers will pay up for the privilege, in the range of 25 cents to 50 cents each time a surfer types in a brand or product. He’ll split revenue 50/50 with publishers.

Playing along so far: Advertisers including Microsoft (MSFT), GE’s (GE) Universal Pictures and Toyota (TM), and publishers including Meredith (MDP), Tribune and AOL (AOL).

AOL is also an investor in the company (previously named AdCopy), via its AOL Ventures arm. Other investors, who have collectively put something like $6 million into the company, include First Round Capital, New Atlantic Ventures and angels like Chris Dixon, Roger Ehrenberg, Aydin Senkut and Shervin Pishevar.

Solve Media from Solve Media on Vimeo.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    This is pretty brilliant!

  • http://www.harrr.org/rrr righini

    really? forcing me to type something has a GOOD impact on my need for that product?

  • http://pithagora.com fjpoblam

    I can live with that.

  • http://garyfales.com/ asset protection

    Gee, tell us what to wear, too!

  • http://www.mostlymaths.net/ Ruben Berenguel

    This would increase the ad viewing and reading. Usually people skim over net ads, without even noticing. This would change it complete the way the net works!

  • Anonymous

    I would find that immensely de-motivating, actually. Microsoft (believe it or not) ASIRRA is a much better idea to my mind. I believe it would make me uncomfortable to type marketing-engineered messages, and I would likely surf to a different domain.

  • http://twitter.com/Sparksheet Dan Levy/Joey Tanny

    This is an idea that has been kicked around for a while, my guess is that it is too weak to defeat the bots. It could be very effective, but really annoying to anyone signing-up.

  • http://ifelse.org/ Michael

    I will drop any service that requires me to retype ad brans and slogans. It kinda makes me sick that its a possibility…

  • Anonymous

    OK thats making a lot of sense dude. LOL

    http://www.online-privacy.eu.tc

  • http://twitter.com/koppelaar Sander Koppelaar

    Although the idea is interesting, I see one problem (apart from whether or not customers will accept it).

    Captchas are mostly used in sign-up procedures. Are brands willing to advertise other brands in their sign-up procedure? Even if it won’t cost them conversion (the ad is not clickable) and if it will actually make them money, it messes with the “holy” signup experience, so that could be a reason for many websites, not to use this.

    It could be great for forums, comment fields etc, but they’re mostly signup based, so there’s little need for captcha there.

  • http://twitter.com/mcmillen Colin McMillen

    The OCR on my cell phone defeated 5 out of 6 of their sample CAPTCHAs.

  • Anonymous

    We’re in the same space, but a little less humiliating than making users type slogans. Check out Bafflebot (www.bafflebot.com) and send me an email if you’re interested in beta testing (kapauldo at gmail).

  • http://twitter.com/manafu Cristian Manafu

    You might like http://adcaptcher.com/ It’s out there for a while and it works just fine. Give it a try!

  • dannyroa
  • Anonymous

    The sponsored CAPTCHA – an idea whose time has come?

  • http://twitter.com/liscrawford Liz Crawford

    Yep. Not sure what they were thinking with those sample CAPTCHAs.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=508196570 Mike Jarema

    That may be true, however these branded captchas have the freedom to ask a much wider range of questions to the surfer: eg. what version is Internet Explorer advertising here? What color is the ads background? A bot will need to become much more sophisticated to analyze what is being asked of it AND generate the correct response.

    The downside certainly is that for any one of these ads there is only a limited number of questions a marketer is willing to create to challenge the viewer of the ad, and something tells me thats a weakness I’m sure the spammers will figure out how to break without much effort.

  • Anonymous

    more annoying than Captchas that you can’t read? Bots can’t parse images very well, that’s why they make the captchas swerve so much that you can’t read them. I hate entering captchas 3 times, don’t you?

  • Anonymous

    Except it’s very easy to break. That text couldn’t be clearer to read programatically, thus defeating the purpose.

    The idea is good though, it needs to be refined though and all it takes is ads that are readable by humans and hard to read by computers.

  • Anonymous

    It’s more annoying having a lot of spammers sending you messages later.

    This captcha is very easy to break.

    The idea is nice though.

  • http://paul.o.airbred.com/ Paul

    Interesting. So this would deny bots (to a degree) and also humans using adblock software.

    Perhaps that is a selling point: “you don’t want people who don’t see your ads”.

    Is it ironic to implement a spam prevention system by forcing spam on people?

  • http://twitter.com/AdvertiseSpace Melissa Randall

    With Captchas normally only being used for sign up pages, I can’t see a lot of ad inventory here?

  • Anonymous

    Pay attention to this captcha with advertizing http://ecpch.com/forum/ucp.php?mode=login
    On 29.07.2010 they were asked a question when there will be multy- language a version of their site. You can see it here http://ecpch.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=53 Service is already in use, but all conditions are only in Russiane, I used google-translate.
    I installed their plugin to my WordPress.
    It works really well, spam doesn’t go through.
    Developers promised that the English version of the site will start very soon.
    The address of developers:
    http://www.cpch.ru
    They have officially opened 31.12.09

  • http://twitter.com/ahmednuaman Ahmed Nuaman

    Very nice idea

  • http://nacs.livejournal.com/ JDavis

    I tried this service out and they have *horrible* payout. Around 10 to 20 cents CPM. Except the CPM they refer to is not the amount of captchas served but the amount of captchas solved.

    So basically, if you annoy the crap out of 1000 of your visitors with these things, they’ll give you, the webmaster, 15 cents on average.

    Thats freaking horrible. Normal ad banners have CPMs near that and they dont require visitors to watch a video and type in text.

  • Anonymous

    Awesome service–makes us a higher ecpm than adwords on technology pages

  • http://twitter.com/youryogi Michael S

    I am currently using it and experience the same *horrible* payout. When I questioned it I was told that the people typing in the responses where from outside the U.S. and currently they only had advertisers that were targeting U.S. citizens.

    Also the payout threshold is a whopping 200 dollars. I am doing the math on what I make and that will take me about three years to reach.

    I am still using it with the hopes that things will improve, but looking at my stats over the last thirty days it looks like this.

    3,845 Impressions
    662 Solved TYPE-INs
    $2 Revenue

    That’s a fair amount of solved Type Ins and so very little in revenue.
    And remember that is thirty days of revenue. I make more on two or three adsense clicks.

    I hope it improves so I am give them a glowing review.

  • Anonymous

    THe payouts on this product are absolutely hideous and amount to slave wages for publishers. As others state here, they refer to cpm’s but only pay for solve’s. I have over 1,000,000 ads served so far with Solve media and have made less than 20 bucks, of course of which i will never see.
    All of us publishers should band together and put these jokers out of business as obviously they are getting paid on a cpm basis and paying publishers on a pay per solve of their product which doesn’t even work right most of the time.

  • http://linkcaptcha.com Dan Neg

    Hello Mitch, How would you see a better model so that both the publishers and the agency can make revenue?

    I will start soon to develop an idea based on ads and captchas, more easy to use and more friendly.

Google’s Cable TV Lineup: A Wishlist

February 22, 2012 at 3:29 pm PT

Hello, Goodbye. That Will Be $1.29.

February 22, 2012 at 6:30 am PT

Resonate Raises $22 Million for “Values” Ads

February 22, 2012 at 4:00 am PT

Sponsored Topic

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Nothing wrong with MySpace price. Just our totally screwing up every way. Agree Facebook revenues will zoom, but still Apple cheap.

— Rupert Murdoch, via Twitter