Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Sports Illustrated Tells iPad Readers to Turn Around

Magazine publishers keep adding bells and whistles to their iPad editions. But Sports Illustrated’s newest tweak goes the other way, and takes an option off the table.

The magazine used to give readers the ability to look at the app in “portrait” or “landscape” modes, but now it only offers the latter. If you’re holding the iPad vertically while using the app’s latest issue, the page won’t rotate like it used to. And you’ll get this odd error message at the bottom of the screen:

What gives? Josh Quittner, who has become Time Inc.’s digital/iPad guru, explains the publisher’s thinking on his personal blog: They think it’s a better way to look at big pictures, and it makes for a smaller download. But perhaps most important: It saves the magazine’s designers some work, since they don’t have to lay out two different versions of the iPad edition.

But wait a minute. The iPad is just a few months old, and iPad magazines are just barely off the drawing board. Is it cost-cutting time already?

Well, sort of, Quittner says, and here he gets around to his real point–Time Warner’s (TWX) magazine unit is still sore at Apple (AAPL) about subscriptions. (And boy oh boy is it excited about working with Google (GOOG) on its tablet platform):

Why not add more designers? Well, if we were able to build a real business, with subscriptions that offered our iPad versions to readers at a reasonable price, that would be a no brainer. But we can’t yet, so the best approach for us is to experiment with the format, marshal our (human) resources and start building products on other platforms that will allow us to scale up as our business grows.

Interesting approach, and I’m not sure it’s the one that’s really going to sway Steve Jobs. If I had to guess, I’d think he’d be much more likely to help out Time Inc. executives if their corporate cousins at Warner Bros. start renting out TV shows for 99 cents a piece on iTunes.

But we’ll see, I guess. Maybe the in-the-works Apple newsstand will be enough to appease the Time Inc. folks. Meantime, here are some detailed instructions about how to read the SI iPad edition:


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=519842429 Danny Gruber

    “The magazine used to give readers the ability to look at the app in “portait” [sic] or “landscape” modes, but now it only offers the former.”

    I think the article should have said “but now it only offers the latter.”

  • Anonymous

    Not only that, but there’s a typo in the SI Editor’s Note (“lanscape”). I wonder how many copy editors SI and WSJ have laid off over the past few years.

  • Anonymous

    Pricing will tell the tale. Many eBooks, for example, cost as much as the paperback (or more) which makes no sense at all from the consumer’s perspective. If that trend continues, why bother with eBooks at all?

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    You’re right! I’m wrong. Thanks for the free copy editing.

  • Anonymous

    Haha. You’re holding it wrong, so we’re showing how to hold your iPad properly.

    I think that TimeWarner is going to have a problem with Android tablet’s sales reaching a huge audience. Apparently, Android tablets are not going to be as cheap as netbooks and may even cost more than the lowest-priced iPad. I don’t know what TimeWarner is so happy to be working with Google and Android tablets when not even one Android tablet comparable in size to the iPad has been sold yet.

  • Anonymous

    SI is being sold as an App. Apple has no say in what the cost is – it’s determined solely by the developer/publisher, so I fail to see how they can blame Apple for not having a “reasonable price” for the magazine.

  • Anonymous

    Implicit in SI’s logic is that in order to read their magazine the way I want to, I will go out and purchase a second expensive pad computer. $500+ for the privilege of buying an SI subscription?
    Folks, you do not understand my priorities.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/QQ7RN3KLMO7FNJYUNYYB337Q6Y Chip

    Well considering that this app and others like them are simply PDF pages or worse simply images of pages stitched together, I can see them trying to reduce the size of these massive apps by cutting HALF the pages from the app. The current app is 2 copies of each page, in each format: one landscape, the other portrait.

    This is also why you can not pinch to zoom, or change the font/text size. They are cheaping out on the magazine to begin with, and not developing anything unique or of value. Might as well simply sell the PDF version online.

    Is this because the business model isn’t there, or because they want it to fail in favor of print?

  • Anonymous

    Don’t Apple’s App Store guidelines require most apps to be designed for both orientations?

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

While it’s tempting to see the Huffington Post’s Pulitzer as a “big win for new media,” or something like that, the real story is that these organizations — the Huffington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post — are becoming more like each other. Old media and new media are increasingly antiquated terms.

— Journalism professor Jay Rosen to HuffPo media writer Michael Calderone (via GigaOM)