Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

Department of Déjà Vu: Little AOL's Quixotic Quest To Land Giant Yahoo

25_armstrong

The last time AOL gobbled up a big company–that would be its audacious grab of Time Warner in the 2000 merger of the century–it ended in tears.

Now, it will take all of CEO Tim Armstrong’s considerable sales skills and impressive cheekbones to pull off a definite longshot the struggling Internet icon is attempting.

That would be trying to convince someone with piles of money–a private equity firm or a cash-rich tech giant such as Microsoft–to help it snatch control of Yahoo and fold AOL into it.

The effort also includes a lot of other moving parts, such as an ability to convince Yahoo’s Asian affiliates to get on board, as well as competing with other predators, including powerful media giant News Corp.

But you have to give the moxie award to Armstrong for trying to take the ragged assets of AOL, which only add up to $2.65 billion in valuation and trade them for Yahoo’s powerful and impressive array of content and communications units. Yahoo’s valuation is $21.5 billion.

The former Google advertising sales head, who arrived at AOL in March of 2009, certainly has been trying to convince Wall Street–and anyone who will listen, in fact–on the idea that AOL is cool once again.

That included a splashy spin-off into a public company, compete with hiring Diddy to be at the party on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, an aggressive marketing campaign and rebranding of AOL, copious and extravagant industry sponsorships (including one with our D: All Things Digital conference last year, which included an appearance by singer Natasha Bedingfield).

And did I mention the AOL break-dancers out in force during the recent Advertising Week in New York?

As I told Armstrong during a recent conversation: If he puts any more lipstick on the AOL pig, it will have to come live with me in San Francisco.

All joking aside, he has to because, for all of Armstrong’s Don Draper-like smoothness, he is contending with a very serious turnaround in AOL.

Its core money-making business, the access part, is drying up fast, while the advertising part is still weak. A string of results in recent quarters bear out the rocky road.

Armstrong does point out–selling, always selling!–that since he took over, he has cut the employee base in half, has added $500 million to the balance sheet, struck a good search deal with Google, has launched new content sites and ad products and has hired a top-flight management team.

All true, but AOL is still huffing and puffing as a tiny player in world of giants.

But that has not stopped Armstrong from aggressively making the rounds to try to take advantage of the distress at Yahoo and the increasing pressure on CEO Carol Bartz.

According to many sources, he has deftly painted himself as the sensible and friendly alternative to her more abrasive style.

It is certainly working–big Yahoo investors love Armstrong and frequently tout him as the long sought after answer to Yahoo’s longtime woes.

Maybe so, but News Corp. also has a strong narrative of uniting Yahoo with a media giant. Frankly, it also has to somehow parlay its weak asset, MySpace, into another format.

Sources said CEO Rupert Murdoch and his digital head Jon Miller have been in touch with the Yahoo board in recent weeks, including former CEO and Co-founder Jerry Yang.

Whatever happens, it will certainly be entertaining to watch Armstrong go up against the wily Murdoch and many others.

The question is: Will the investors of AOL and Yahoo laugh or cry in the end?


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OCKNB2R6P24XDOHOFVZTIZAWQA Jacob Andersen

    why should Carol sell Alibaba before the value of Alibaba’s non-public companies are realized thru an IPO? i cant see how it makes sense to do a deal now? Jack Ma is not about to pay anywhere near top dollar for Yahoo’s shares in Alibaba Group. No way he will. That is also why a Private Equity deal just wont work. Because they are counting on Alibaba paying $9-$10 billion for the Yahoo shares and there is no way that is gonna happen. And Carol would be stupid to take less. Why take less when you can wait a year and get so much more — billions more! Heck, I think you should respect Carol more just for not selling out now. I pray she doesn’t just sell yahoo out cheap just to get her own shares to vest. One more thing. Innovation is very tough. Yahoo’s display business is going nicely I believe. As for search. They made a decent move with Microsoft. Wasn’t the best thing and yes they are losing share. Search is a tough one. Google is rough. We both know that as part of Bing, Yahoo will be getting nice royalty checks and that profit from search will probably double over the next few quarters. Plus, Yahoo is selling Bing’s top advertisers (i am not sure myself what that means yet). Even if Yahoo continues to lose search share I just dont think she should sell now and I dont think she will. Jerry Yang only gets redemption if the price is near $30. I think he will do his best to hold for that. He is friend’s with Jack Ma. He knows big value is there. Heck, maybe Taobao search will win 5-8% of the market (including growing mobile search market) in China.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OCKNB2R6P24XDOHOFVZTIZAWQA Jacob Andersen

    one more thing. i think all the bashing of carol and the talk of jack ma not liking her is just attempts to get carol and the board to make a stupid move and sell yahoo early. of course MA wants his shares back cheaply. he’s like a little kid who starts a fight cause he cant get his way. sorry MA no deal for cheap. Analyst Mark May provided his “The Case For Carol Bartz” — i agree with May. finance.yahoo.com/news/The-Case-For-Carol-paidcontent-478677899.html?x=0&.v=2

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GDFR4LVJS73B64WN6LRHBDJ6VI Thomas Friedah

    private equity is clearly behind this bashing of Carol Bartz. its just too obvious. Today NY Times:
    nytimes.com/2010/10/15/business/15views.html?_r=1&src=busln

    read Scott Blier’s post on Yahoo:
    Anatomy of a Takeover
    ibankcoin.com/scott_bleier/

  • Anonymous

    looked at another way (clearly) this is basically Yahoo’s hunt for a new CEO. If it has to merge with AOL to have AOL’s Tim as CEO then it’s what it has to do. I think Tim and Jerry is a better show than Carol and Jerry. If there was a Tom CEO available then even better: Tom and Jerry show.

  • Anonymous

    Tim,

    Thanks for your contribution to AOL!

    We will surely miss you as you move on to your next big opportunity, where ever that is! ( We heard you were joining Don Drapers’ team over at Sterling Cooper Draper Price, that’s great news! They need help on the Lucky Strike account!! )

    Best of success to you!

    Before leaving please stop by HR to turn in your car, and other company issued hardware and software so that we can release your final paycheck.

    Also, because of the current economic climate, this years’ Christmas Party will be cancelled, as well as the Thanksgiving Turkey Give-Away, all to cut costs as we wind down the company. Your departure, while tragic will allow us even more cost savings heading into 2011 and give us a way to fend off some of the more militant investors asking for more performance out of the company even as we sunset in to irrelevancy.

    Again, we wish you all the best!

    –AOL Board

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

I break down a product the same way I break down a character I’m going to play. I try to get inside the mind of that person — the user, the consumer — and figure out why they’re doing something and what they want from it.

— Ashton Kutcher’s investing philosophy