Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Yes, Cord Cutting Is Real, Says Report That The Cable Guys Don't Believe

Back to the cord-cutting debate!

Research firm SNL Kagan says the U.S. pay-TV business lost 119,000 subscribers last quarter. That’s only the second time in history that this has happened, and the first time was the previous quarter.

And it’s important to note Kagan is talking about all pay-TV businesses, not just the cable guys. Or more accurately: The cable guys like Time Warner Cable and Comcast are losing more customers (741,000) than the satellite guys and telcos like Verizon are adding (621,000).

If you want to spin this positively for the pay-TV business, you can argue that the losses are slowing: In Q2, pay TV lost 216,000 subs.

And if you want to be a little less positive, you can argue, as the cable guys do, that if they are losing customers, it’s because the economy stinks.

Nonsense, says the cord-cutting crowd, who believes that people are starting to leave pay TV, in increasing numbers, for a combination of the Internet, rabbit ears and the likes of Netflix and Apple TV.

And Kagan is with the cord cutters here. From their release:
“It is becoming increasingly difficult to dismiss the impact of over-the-top substitution on video subscriber performance, particularly after seeing declines during the period of the year that tends to produce the largest subscriber gains due to seasonal shifts back to television viewing and subscription packages.”

Or in English. People are cord-cutting. It’s happening now.

But here’s the thing: There’s a valid reason for the pay-TV guys to say they don’t see what Kagan is talking about. Because they don’t. Or at least they have numbers that say otherwise.

Here’s Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes, who owns several very successful cable networks, speaking at an industry conference today. “The trend, as far as we can see it, continues up…it’s all good,” he told the New York Times’ David Carr. “They’re not cutting.”

And look at these numbers from cable powerhouse Viacom, whose CEO Philippe Dauman just dismissed cord-cutting talk as “much ado about nothing”. They show Viacom’s overall subscriber count, network by network, for the third quarter. And all of the domestic channels’ sub numbers, at least, have increased in the last year (click to enlarge):

So something, somewhere doesn’t add up.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=533634679 Jay Yarow

    Didn’t Bewkes also say even if cord cutters are cutting cords, it doesn’t matter because our revenue is growing? Thought I heard that.

  • Anonymous

    Any chance this is also linked to a reduction of single-family homes? I.e. college grads moving back in with parents don’t need two subscriptions. Would like to see a comparison of this to foreclosure numbers.

  • Anonymous

    If Netflix could stream current sports….I’d cut my Dish subscription in a NY minute.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Which is why they won’t. Or at least not under the current set up.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Yes, this is one of the things people talk about to explain the numbers: New home starts down, for obvious reasons, new home formations down as well. Another one, which the cable guys talk about but no one seems to pay attention to: People who signed for cable when the digital transmission went into effect a year ago, but who have decided to live without it, after all.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    He said everything was growing.

  • Anonymous

    If the programs I watch, were live streamed over the Internet, I’d drop the Sat subscription as soon as I could without incurring a chargeback

  • Anonymous

    It’s not cord cutting if you still get your internet service from the cable company. The fear of being a “dumb pipe” was a concept from the nineties when (1) there was a genuine concern that cable internet could not actually deliver the goods and (2) that local exchange carriers and wireless ISPs might provide sufficient competition to challenge the big utility oligarchy. Neither of those materialized, even fibre to the home belongs to either the cable or telcos. What does this have to do with how you view your shows? If you don’t pay for the channel packages, they’ll just raise your rates on the internet access. There is no alternative, and sorry satellite customers, you’re merely statistical outliers in the equation.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_U2H7S4MG6PLQUVOA2CFNMZ2QUQ Ric Desan

    If I could get my broadband elsewhere, my cable cut would have already happened a few NY minutes ago.

  • The Wizard

    I’m going to get rid of my Dish Network soon. I’ve found ways to get my sports, and watch over the air, as well as stream all my shows. The problem with these cable and Sat companies is that they throw too much at you. I get 120 channels, of which I only watch 12. So 90% of what I pay for I don’t watch. These companies need to offer a package that lets you choose what channels you get. One thing is for sure. TV watching is changing

  • http://www.cockenadoodledoo.com Jared C.

    When most people refer to cord cutting, they mean ditching a cable tv service that doesn’t allow them to purchase just the channels they’re interested in.

    I cut in 2010; documented the pros and cons; and illustrated the whole thing here: http://tumblr.com/x6e1lbwqc6

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

While it’s tempting to see the Huffington Post’s Pulitzer as a “big win for new media,” or something like that, the real story is that these organizations — the Huffington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post — are becoming more like each other. Old media and new media are increasingly antiquated terms.

— Journalism professor Jay Rosen to HuffPo media writer Michael Calderone (via GigaOM)