Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

RIM Co-CEO Mike Lazaridis, Live at Dive Into Mobile

UPDATE: You can now see video of the entire session.

———————————

EARLIER:

It wasn’t that long ago that Research in Motion defined smartphones: You either owned a BlackBerry, or your phone wasn’t smart.

Fast-forward to present tense, though, and it’s a different story. Depending on whom you talk to, RIM has either been passed by Apple’s iPhone, or is about to be. Google’s Android is coming up just as fast, too.

RIM is trying to fight back with new phones that look a lot like the competitions’, and by venturing away from phones altogether, with its new PlayBook tablet, too. Will that work? Co-CEO Mike Lazaridis makes his case to Walt Mossberg and Kara Swisher.

Live Blog

Mike Lazaridis shows up onstage with a PlayBook.

He’s walking through various apps.

Switching quickly between HD video, different apps, via multitasking.

“This is the way we like to work… it’s as easy as just sliding between the apps that you have loaded”

“Why this size,” asks Kara

At 7 inches, “it’s just the perfect size”, says Mike.

So no plans to make it in a bigger size, asks Walt. [Pause] We have plans for different sizes, says Mike.

Mike walks through multiple platforms, languages that the tablet supports. “This is a complete mobile computing platform.”

Time to sit in the comfy chairs.

University of Waterloo seems to be responsible for most of RIM’s tech, says Mike, who is an alum. “All of this is coming together to set up BlackBerry for the next decade.”

When is this launching? “Tracking first quarter”, says Mike.

Walt asks if PlayBook system will migrate into BlackBerry.

Mike: We’ve wanted to do real mobile computing since we got into this. Have been constrained by tech limits, but … [sort of unclear what he's saying here]

Walt cuts him off: There’s a growing consensus that BlackBerry is “looking old compared to some of the other platforms.” So: If PlayBook is future of the BlackBerry, when does this OS get there?

Mike: Answers that BlackBerry OS is about multicore products. [?]

Kara Swisher is also confused.

So does the tablet become the phone?

Mike tries another tack, talking about BlackBerry in worldwide markets. In 2G markets, it’s becoming dominant. Also successful in 3G markets.

PlayBook OS allows us “jump into the next decade of mobile computing.”

Walt is confused as well.

Are you saying that you essentially stop paying as much attention to improving BlackBerry phones, and put next generation of tech into tablets?

4:37 pm: Colleague Ina Fried has a post up with more on the PlayBook over at her Mobilized blog..

Mike: “Rather than trying to be all things to all people,” we can present the best product for the market or the situation.

Mike: “Three distinct market areas. This is brand new. This is a paradigm shift.”

The three: Phones, superphones and tablets.

“But it’s not going to happen overnight. And you have to think about this as a global player,” and you can’t abandon markets that don’t have 3G or 4G, and that can’t afford high-end stuff.

“So all of this will be called BlackBerry”? Asks Walt. Yes, says Mike.

Kara: Talk about Apple and Google, please. And do you think BlackBerry lagged? What happened for you?

Mike: “We were focusing on a global market,” and as a result, BlackBerry is becoming No. 1 around the world. Strategy for the future, etc.

Mike: Apple and Android are trying to take a mobile phone OS and upgrade it for a tablet. We’re starting with a bona-fide mobile computing platform for tablets.

Kara: How do you react to all the stories burying you?

Mike: We’ve been at this a long time. Goes on to explain his history.

Walt cuts him off: Great, but “there’s a widespread tangible feeling that you’ve been left behind.”

Kara: I used to love my Blackberry, but I don’t have one anymore. “It was an abandonment of it.”

Walt: “Something has happened” over the years to “your iconic leadership.”

Kara: “Not in Sumatra,” but here, in the United States.

Mike: We’re running a business. We invented the smartphone. We decided to go global.

Walt: So did you decided to chain yourself to lowest common denominator technology?

Mike: Technical discussion of multicores. Says competitors learning how big a market there is. We built our own technology, etc.

Rattles off tech certifications. Walt: “I don’t know what those mean.”

Kara: Back to the competitive landscape, please.

Mike: Focusing on strength–enterprise and security. Military, police, etc. Reliability and security.

Walt: So why are you running all these consumer ads?

Mike: “Because the BlackBerry has crossed over!”

Walt: Here’s the problem with enterprise–plenty of professionals now want to pick their own phones, like Apple and Android.

Mike: “We didn’t go out and try to make BlackBerry a consumer device. It crossed over on its own.”

Kara: Please rank your competition.

Mike: We’re the best, of course!

“We’re all using Flash on our PCs. We’re all using Flash on our Macs. Why wouldn’t we expect Flash to run our tablet….There’s all this content out there. Why would you limit yourself?”

Walt: OK, so that’s a differentiator. But Apple is selling lots of Flash-less tablets.

Mike: “Really early days, Walt.”

Walt: Price? Mike: No answer. And when will the Playbook OS get into phones? ML: No real answer.

Mike’s summary of RIM’s position: “This is a huge market, and we have a front-row seat, and this is all our own intellectual property.”

Q&A

Can you update us on BlackBerry 6 OS in the market, and how are you doing at attracting developers?

Mike: BlackBerry 6 available on the Torch, the Bold, coming soon to Curves. “It really is the foundation of us going forward on the BlackBerry.”

Q: I own a Torch. The processor is slow, and screen is low-res. I don’t understand connection between this and the PlayBook. “I don’t really understand it….how can you deliver this phone without the best technology available today?”

“Why are you demoting my phone?”

Mike: BlackBerry Torch is a launch vehicle for BlackBerry 6. But you can make that argument in reverse… [sorry, can't follow what he's saying]. The next generation of BlackBerry will be great. “I don’t see any dichotomy here. I just see a natural evolution here.”

Q: I really don’t think my Torch is as fast and good as you say it is.

Mike: Seems to be arguing that phones limited by battery issues.

Q: Consumers say security isn’t important, until it is, right?

Mike: Right!

Enterprise clients understand how important security is. But now that consumers are using phones for things like banking, NFC, they are getting much more sensitive to security. “And BlackBerry will lead the way.”

Q: Please talk about Apple and Google getting into enterprise. “Do you feel that as a threat?”

Mike: “I see a thriving industry.” Metaphor about interstate highways and competition. “Today, we have several car manufacturers out there. We’re going to find the same thing with smartphones.”

“When you consider how large the market is today” and then realize that the market is moving into smartphones, “that’s a great recipe for business.”

Q: You bought The Astonishing Tribe. What’s the plan there?

Mike: TAT is an amazing company. Exciting ability to add 150 top designers, developers to BlackBerry as we’re “accelerating into the next century.”

Done. Thanks and good night! Drinks upstairs!

UPDATE: Here’s a highlight reel of Lazaridis’ appearance. We’ll have the entire clip in the days to come:


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    Old Lazy is out doing himself in vague BS that makes it sound like Rimm is leaping past Android & Apple with “new” technologies & systems.

    Sooner, rather than later the customers will ALL see that the emperor has no clothes.

    Eh?

    Ayuh

  • Anonymous

    Love it – raking this dinosaur over the coals!

  • http://twitter.com/Culex316 Robert Dunn

    hahaha, funny seeing Mike Lazaridis try to B.S. his way through all those tough questions.

  • Anonymous

    Holly hell who wrote this, you know nothing about technology. Shit what the two questioners on the stage seem to know nothing as well. What a joke!

    @44anal you know nothing as well. Learn QNX and you’ll see that the emperor you are referring to is apple and SJ. Remember all the people played along with the emperor until the little boy pointed out that …. the iPad is piece of shit.

  • Anonymous

    Where’s the video of the interview? Let me judge and interpret for myself. I know enough not to take anything from the media for face value.

  • Anonymous

    RIMM is a rapid product cycle company. Apple is no different. Success is predicated on always staying a step ahead of everyone, RIM has been able to do that in the past and what it needs 2-3 killer device launches in 2011 and that will back in the top league.

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/willtcox AlleyGator

    They don’t post videos immediately. Check back tomorrow, they’ll definitely have it up.

  • http://twitter.com/Saminlp Saminlp

    How is the iPad at all a POS? By what qualifications? You know what’s a POS? Something that I can’t even use like the PlayBook. Talk all they want but the iPad will have been in consumer hands for over a year before their tiny tablet ships…it’s easy to best your competition with a hypothetical device AFTER the competition has been out for a really long time…think about it….

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZFQL4MU5WYNYC6IS5H5V3PJUUQ cben15606

    Great article, here’s a synopsis:

    Kara: You want a hit off this doobie?

    Mike: No, I don’t..

    Walt cuts him off: I have my own, MMMMPH-MMMPH!

    Kara: I really like the ipod commercials, i’m confused,(to Mike) who are you?

    Walt: MMMPH! MMMMPH!

  • Anonymous

    This is trending on Twitter as of Dec-7 @ 9pm pst:
    http://twitter.com/#!/search/Lazaridis

  • Anonymous

    I love the irony:

    He basically says “we’re doing it right – we didn’t start with a mobile phone OS like Apple did.”

    However, it’s funny as iOS is a tablet OS that was crammed into a smartphone. Apple had a “bona-fide mobile computing platform for tablets” and simply put it in the iPhone as its first product to market.

    There are simply two table markets right now: Apple, and anti-Apple. Time will tell if Apple will continue to dominate, but I sincerely doubt Blackberry ever will or even can dominate this market.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Added a 7-minute highlight reel to the bottom of this post. We’ll have the full clip eventually.

  • Anonymous

    Blackberry’s #1 worldwide? Yeah, right. I believe that’s Nokia. You can hardly find blackberries in countries like Russia because the infrastructure’s not there, everyone uses Nokia.

    The interview appears to be a CEO saying- what we have it great, buy it. What’s coming out is great, buy it too.

    I’ve seen several androids, all the iphone models and every rim business model except the torch since 2007. (we’re not interested in the torch, rim doesn’t have good touchscreen models)

    to give you an idea of where we’ve gone, three years ago we were 100% blackberry smartphones. In 2010 we have more smartphones by almost 2x but we have less blackberries than we did two years ago. a number of them are off contract and we have a project to finish and then we’ll consider our options for replacing them

  • Anonymous

    RIMM hsan’t been able to do that since 2007. That’s 4 years, bro. I think they’re on the way out.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=755802498 Chris Muir

    RIM invented the smart phone? I don’t think so.

  • Anonymous

    Peter, he isn’t as incoherent as you’re making him out to be. I am not much of a fan of BB smartphones that RIM is currently putting out there. And I believe that they have fallen behind a lot – though Nokia may be the grand winner in that department.

    Still, the answers were logical but smell of a difficult product strategy – they have seemingly decided to support two families of OS : Tablet & Phone; while the rest of the industry is using one OS on multiple platforms.

    If this approach were to work successfully, each or either of the BB OS has to head-above-shoulders outdo the competition because it is specifically ‘designed’ for tablets / phones and not for a ‘generic’ device. Approach sounds fine, but can they execute it? I think that’s where the cookie will crumble.

  • http://twitter.com/kylekemper Kyle Kemper

    Tough crowd. Why so much hating folks?

    Walt and Kara are of the Silicon Valley mindset that doesn’t really understand, or want to understand, RIM and “BlackBerry”; its easy to hate an outsider. Mike is a technical guy and this was a tough gig for him.

    The future is friendly for everyone so the tone needs to change. Device manufacturers are primed for huge profits as the world continues adopting smartphone technology.

    Current US smartphone penetration is around 25%..this will approach 100% within the decade, perhaps even globally.

    There’s plenty of fuel so instead of back and forth hating look at the bigger picture.

    RIM is a leader in this market…and so is Apple.

    Whether you like it or not, RIMs technology is reliable, durable, and powerful. There’s a reason for their enduring success.

    As for Apple, their technology is ubereasy, apptastic, and fashionable.

    The two can co-exist. Android falls somewhere in the middle as an OS but google has yet to prove itself a device manufacturer. Android isn’t a RIM or Apple but a QNX for ex-WinMo OEMs.

  • http://twitter.com/TylerNelson42 Tyler Nelson

    When the text of the interview hit yesterday I was concerned…you made him out to be confused and dazed by challenging questions… the video tells a different story.. This is Mike being smarter than everyone else in the room…listen very very carefully… One OS, multi core drives performance ahead of the competitors, the smartphone becomes a multi protocol radio stack (no more one version per airlink protocol) so one device is the coms hub and the tablet is the consumption and interaction tool…oh – and see the blazing fast performance of the Torch UI on a low end bill of materials chasis – imagine what can come next to take a low end BB into low cost markets like India and others and own the smartphone market on low cost hardware… listen..

  • http://twitter.com/#!/dutchtender m j

    oh ok…he speaks a special language only smart people understand. that explains everything.

  • http://www.facebook.com/danchen13 Dan Chen

    RIM = Palm FTW!

  • drwevil

    I guess being CEO he needs to out a positive spin on things but…

    I have a bb bold and an iPhone to describe the bb bold experience in one word “Hideous” IMHO the iPhone is far from perfect but my 2 year old can drive my iPhone she doesn’t stand a chance my bb.

    Also when out shopping for Christmas I made some really good deals on pressants using my iPhone if I tried on my bb I’d still be there plus the apps I use like lassoo I use for looking up comprising stores brochures simply isn’t available on the bb.

    Personally I think unless Rim pulls something spectacular out of their collective buts bb will be gone in less than 10 years.

    My iPhone can do everything and more than my bb bold and much better. Looking at the sales figures I’d say I’m not the only one with that opinion.

D:Dive Into Mobile

Conversations with the most influential figures in mobile.
December 10, 2010
San Francisco, California

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

D Conference Mailing List

Sign up for News about D Conferences

Anonymous is a handful of geniuses surrounded by a legion of idiots.

— Cole Stryker an author who has researched the hacker group