Tricia Duryee

Recent Posts by Tricia Duryee

PayPal Releases Funds to WikiLeaks as Supporters Strike Back

PayPal has just released the remaining funds in the account associated with WikiLeaks today, after restricting access to the account last week, according to a PayPal blog post.

The release of funds follows a number of denial-of-service attacks earlier this week that were aimed at the document-leaking site’s providers. Most of the providers are now refusing to work with WikiLeaks after the U.S. government accused it of being in possession of documents that were provided in violation of U.S. law.

Yesterday, WikiLeak’s founder Julian Assange was arrested and denied bail in London. He’s accused of sexual misconduct in Sweden.

While PayPal is releasing the residual funds to WikiLeaks, it is not reinstating the ability for it to receive donations.

PayPal was caught up in a brief media storm this morning, after PayPal’s VP of Platform Osama Bedier gave the impression at LeWeb in Paris that PayPal had cut off access to WikiLeaks because of direct pressure by the U.S. government.

PayPal now wants to set the record straight, and says that it reviewed its policies regarding WikiLeaks after the U.S. Department of State publicized a letter stating that WikiLeaks may be in possession of documents that were provided in violation of U.S. law. The letter was published, and not sent to PayPal directly.

“PayPal was not contacted by any government organization in the U.S. or abroad. We restricted the account based on our Acceptable Use Policy review,” writes PayPal’s General Counsel John Muller. “Ultimately, our difficult decision was based on a belief that the WikiLeaks website was encouraging sources to release classified material, which is likely a violation of law by the source.”

Further, the company disclosed that twice before–in 2008 and 2009–PayPal reviewed and restricted the account associated with WikiLeaks “for reasons unrelated to our Acceptable Use Policy. As soon as proper information was received from the account holder, the restrictions were lifted.”

PayPal has been one of many providers that have been the victim of computer attacks, where servers were inundated with traffic. A spokesperson told us that it mostly affected the company’s blog site, and did not directly affect its payments services.

Other affected companies include MasterCard and Swiss bank PostFinance, The Wall Street Journal reports. No one is yet claiming responsibility for the attacks, but some say they are being organized by the ad hoc “Operation Payback.”


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Dean Procter

    wikileaks US cables are for sale on Amazon and payment by Mastercard or Visa is ok.

    Did Amazon have a commercial interest in cutting off the source of free wikileawks documents in favour of their own books and kindle’s full of US cables for sale?

    Do paypal assert that wikileaks distributing the cables for free is illegal, but Amazon doing it for cash is ok?

    http://amzn.to/hmxY8Z

  • DragonI

    This band of Internet Freedom Fighters vigilantism will set an unintended precedence – leading others with not so good intentions into cyber blackmail for profit

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1299167553 Carl Papworth

    If you knew the true nature of this attack Dragonl, you would have different views.

    These attacks are conducted through the unity of literally thousands of internet users. There is no leader. There is no one for the funds to be directed to. There is no funding required. These are vigilantes and internet superheroes representing internet political activism at it’s core.

  • DragonI

    @Carl, I totally understand the reasons for Operation Payback. I never implied that they had asked for any funds. Their actions no matter how noble will create an unintended consequence. Criminals will use DDoS as a tool to blackmail sites for money instead of morals.

    I fully support WikiLeaks but not through these methods.

  • http://smudgethefirst.tumblr.com Smudge

    Criminals already do this. Operation Payback will change nothing in this regard.

  • Anonymous

    LOL, yeah right. Rest ASSURED that they were “pressured” by DOJ or CIA jsut like everyone else is! How pathetic!

    http://www.privacy-solutions.edu.tc

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/FYISZVZYZGPNXJIAAZX5YPVHBA BIG ITALIAN SAUSAGE

    PayPal=You’re FULL OF SHITE–No WONDER you work so well with the a$$holes on the Hill…

  • http://twitter.com/KalengoInvest kalengo

    the power of U.S government cannot be ignored.

  • http://www.realestateactive.com/ Michael Real

    These attacks to financial institutions show how disgruntled internet users are with the institutions decision to block service to Wikileaks. Although these institutions do have the right to deny service but that must be in accordance with their TOS.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AMM6KKHTKNQPYJYOOZDFNQBRLA Yuko's Eyes

    We are told time and again to vote with our dollars (even though individuals have unequal shares of votes and weight to their voice). When Paypal, Visa and Mastercard suppress donations to Wikileaks, we can’t even vote with our dollars. We need to seriously ask ourselves what kind of system we live in. What is our voice and existence worth? What lengths must we go to to prove our existence and claim our rights?

  • Anonymous

    Thumbs Up PayPal!

  • Anonymous

    Thumbs Up PayPal!

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

He’s an a–hole. That guy has $2 billion that he made from figuring out ways to steal royalties from artists, and that’s the bottom line. You can’t really trust anybody like that.

— Black Keys drummer Patrick Carney on why he’s not a fan of Sean Parker