Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Big Media Tells Big Media That Hulu Is Hurting Big Media

Dear TV business:
All that free TV that you’re giving away at Hulu and other sites? That’s hurting the TV business.
Sincerely,
The TV business.

That’s my translation of comments from Turner Broadcasting’s Phil Kent today. The head of Time Warner’s cable network told the crowd at a Citigroup investment conference that his company had pulled out of bidding for reruns of “Modern Family” because the show was “a little too prevalent on the Internet.”

The sitcom runs on both ABC.com and Hulu, so I’m not clear if Kent was talking about one or the other, or both. Either way, those comments have to simultaneously please and dismay “Modern Family” creator Steve Levitan, who has complained that giving away streams of his show on Hulu doesn’t do him any good and probably does him harm.

Levitan isn’t the only one who thinks that way: There are plenty of TV people who worry that free streaming on the Web is hurting their business, either by sapping ratings or cutting down on the appetite for DVDs and syndication. In this case, the supposed value shrinkage hurts News Corp., which produces the show and owns the rerun rights, more than it does Disney’s ABC, which airs the initial run. (News Corp. also owns this Web site.)

That’s one of the fundamental tensions Hulu has to deal with, and the primary reason why taking the joint venture public remains such a long shot–until all of its owner/partners are willing to make long-term programming commitments to the site, it’s hard to see the long-term value in the company.

Still, it’s important to note that Kent didn’t abstain from bidding–he simply dropped out. The Los Angeles Times’ plugged-in Joe Flint estimates that Turner was willing to pay about $1 million per episode, which isn’t as much as the winning $1.4 million bid, but isn’t immaterial, either.

Oh. And the winner of the bid? GE’s NBC Universal–one of Hulu’s three owner/partners.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://twitter.com/Kellychristense Kelly Christensen

    if its not streamed for free with ad content on hulu (or another sponsored site), it will stream somewhere else illegally and no one will get paid.

  • http://twitter.com/Kellychristense Kelly Christensen

    if it does not stream with paid advertisement somewhere, it will stream somewhere illegally without ad revenue.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ABNPVA74IX2BJI2UQDBOUWFGAY J

    Kent is right, but also missing the whole point. Streaming is the future – syndication and DVDs will go the way of the dinosaur.

  • http://twitter.com/Rajnishr Rajnish

    There is an interesting competitive forces at work here. SVOD competes with the VOD services of the cable company and that is the tension that cable companies have with Netflix. Time shift streaming like Hulu competes with the DVR service that cable companies offer. That is the tension between Hulu and cable companies. The cable companies will try to slow down Netflix by both metered BB as well as preventing them from getting more content in future. More and more content on Hulu will go behind the payment wall.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Twitter’s still in its honeymoon period, but that won’t last forever. At some point, it’s going to be less of a wunderkammer, and more of a regrettable necessity.

— Reuters finance blogger Felix Salmon, in an article entitled “Why Twitter will get more annoying”