Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Maybe UltraViolet, the Ginormous Media Cloud Locker Thingy, Won't Fail, After All. What Do You Say, Steve Jobs?

I’m very, very wary of typing this, because it’s about a yet-to-be-released product that’s being demoed at the Consumer Electronics Show.

Which means it could all be from the Island of Pretendistan, which supplies a good portion of the stuff you see every year at CES.

But! It’s possible that “UltraViolet,” the super-ambitious/probably-way-too-unwieldy coalition of just about every big media and tech company except Apple, may actually work. If Steve Jobs will let it.

The big idea behind UltraViolet is that it will let consumers purchase media that can work on multiple devices, using a cloud-based “rights locker.” So someone who bought, say, a “Harry Potter” DVD can watch it on their Blu-ray player, but also on their iPad, or their friend’s Google TV, or whatever.

It’s supposed to start rolling out this spring, and it’s a good idea. In theory.

In practice, even if the group putting this together–everyone from Akamai to Sony to Microsoft to Time Warner–can get the technology to work on every platform, the fact that Apple isn’t playing along is a huge problem. The music industry used to have a “works on most devices except for Apple” standard, and it was called Windows Media Audio. Remember? No?

But today Akamai, which is powering the back end for UltraViolet, will demo a version of the service on four devices: A Windows-based PC, a Mac, an iPad and an iPhone.

The UltraViolet people still don’t have Apple’s buy-in on the project, but the demo is meant to prove that the coalition can still work with Apple’s products, even if Apple doesn’t formally sign up. They’re accomplishing that by playing the Mac stuff on a Web browser, and on the iPhone and iPad via an iOS app that Akamai hasn’t submitted to Apple yet.

But the Akamai people say they don’t see why Apple will have a problem with the app, and stress they’ve been working closely with Apple to make sure that their tech synchs with the iOS platform.

They could be right, too. Apple lets plenty of other companies sell products that compete with Apple’s own media offerings via the App Store: Amazon’s Kindle, Pandora, Hulu, Spotify (sort of), etc.

If so, then UltraViolet really could pan out, if the coalition doesn’t screw it up with byzantine restrictions and pricing tiers–$X amount for a DVD, $X+Y for a DVD with iPhone privileges, etc. (It’ll probably do just that, actually.)

Still, Steve Jobs has been very successful at tending a walled garden. And if UltraViolet really works, it means he’d be letting someone else manage Apple customers’ media, and letting all that work he’s put into nurturing the Mac/iTunes/iOS ecosystem go to waste.

Theoretically possible. But so is a lot of the stuff we see at CES that never shows up anywhere else.

AKAMAI DEMONSTRATES DELIVERY OF ULTRAVIOLET ENTERTAINMENT

· Prototype unveiled at CES for delivering content that meets the UltraViolet specifications
· UltraViolet is a new industry standard that makes it easier for consumers to purchase, access and watch digital entertainment from a variety of locations and devices

2011 International Consumer Electronics Show, Las Vegas – January 6, 2011 – Akamai Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKAM), the leading provider of cloud optimization services, today announced its involvement with the Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem (DECE) LLC, and demonstrated a prototype for delivering digital home entertainment content according to DECE’s recently announced UltraViolet specifications. UltraViolet represents a new way for consumers to enjoy greater choice and flexibility in how, when and where they collect and watch digital movies and TV shows.

While not yet commercialized, the prototype Akamai unveils at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) will detail how its video delivery platform will allow consumers to experience UltraViolet movies and TV content they have purchased. It is also designed to enable retailers to more easily bring UltraViolet services to market. When consumers buy UltraViolet entertainment, the access rights to that content can be stored in their UltraViolet account and digital locker, which is accessible across multipleplatforms and devices. In addition to easy access, UltraViolet is designed to increase the value of digital entertainment by enabling streaming as well as download and burn to physical media functionality.

“One key facet of UltraViolet’s open-specs design is the ability for world-class infrastructure and B2B service providers like Akamai to accelerate retailers’ deployments, with premium-quality enablement and delivery on a cost-efficient basis,” said Mark Teitell, general manager of DECE. “As a member of DECE, Akamai’s prototyping of this UltraViolet experience is a great example of how individual companies’ initiative and market development will combine with our industry-standard technical specs to bring UltraViolet to consumers this year.”

The integrated Akamai video delivery platform and the UltraViolet digital locker are designed to enable leading retailers to quickly bring premium, turn-keyUltraViolet-compliant services to market. Beginning with the sale of physical media like Blu-ray discs that come with UltraViolet, retailers will be able to extend their relationship with consumers to include UltraViolet-compliant services to stream high definition content to connected devices such as Internet TVs and Blu-ray players, and mobile apps for smartphones and tablets.

“Over the last decade, Akamai has had the privilege of working with the top retailers, consumer electronic manufacturers and media and entertainment companies to accelerate their websites and enable high-quality digital media experiences,” said Steven Chester, Akamai Vice President of Film. “Akamai believes that our distributed global network is uniquely able to provide the scale, security and quality required for the industry’s next phase of business model innovation. Akamai’s goal is to enable retailers and content providers to take advantage of the incredible opportunity presented by UltraViolet, and be a part of bringing the next generation of premium home entertainment services to the market.”.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    “And if Ultraviolet really works, it means he’d be letting someone else manage Apple customers’ media…”

    No. There are 3 levels here.

    1) Not on the device.

    2) On the device in other vendors apps.

    3) Adopted by Apple.

    I think you are likely to see multiple competing systems offering buy once, play anywhere, media. Apple and Amazon are both likely contenders.

    This would mean that 2) was likely but 3) would depend on the success of the competing system, and their charging approach.

  • Anonymous

    Apple has long maintained that it does not make significant money on the iTunes store. Personally, I believe this – tho I am sure that this is not the intent of video sales and rentals, nor with iBooks.

    The purpose of iTunes is to provide a very easy way for their customers to get their media for the Apple devices. Apple wants to be sure that their customers have an easy way to do this. They do not really care if you use Netflix on their AppleTV – they want you to BUY the ATV.

    (It works very similar to Google’s motivation behind Android. Android exists to drive ad revenue to Google. They do not care where you buy your cell phone.)

    If this is the case, then it really makes little difference to Apple if this technology is implemented. In fact, it might even help drive ATV sales.

  • Anonymous

    Why would Apple ever do this? If there were some reason to support a common DRM format, Apple could license FairPlay, which already works, and which is on well over 100 million devices.

  • Anonymous

    There is always a problem with interpreting the term “industry standard”.

    Unqualified, industry standard clearly sounds like a good thing, but one needs to understand the motivations of the developers, and advocates.

    Once upon a time, industry standard was a term applies to a situation where the whole industry got together to agree something for the benefit of the consumer.

    Now industry standard seems to mean something where part of the industry gets together to agree something to their mutual advantage. You should also remember that some members of such a group will be there primalily to ensure that the standard becomes too complex to ever be adopted.

    The current Adobe Flash situation illustrates this nicely. After years of being a closed technology, Adobe declares Flash to be an open standard. Since it has a working(ish) implementation, it is confident that nobody will reimplement, and if they do then Adobe can always change the spec. This was on the way down the pan until the Android community picked up on it as a way to counter Apple, as Apple were unwilling to accept Flash’s downside. Within days half the industry is calling Flash a standard. Do they mean it? No. If Apple also accepted Flash, it would quietly vanish.

    Blu-ray was a “standard” which included content protection. It appears to have been used to lock Apple out of high def video disks. MS fully adopted it in Vista and it is widely understood that this is what made Vista the unwieldy brute that it was. Jobs describes Blu-Ray an a bag of pain, but I suspect that in the end MS got most of the pain. The copy protection only lasted for a week anyway.

    Microchannel Arcitecture was a standard, devised to try to get control of the PC back to IBM.

    A real open standard, devised by the industry, for the universal benefit, generally becomes universally accepted. Is that the case here?

    Who are the stake holders?

    The film makers for one. They need to believe in the copy protection. Are they on board? Well Disney is one of the biggest and is developing it’s own system, Keychest, so no.

    The film media distributers for two. Apple is one of the biggest and has it’s own system that is working well. So no.

    The customers. They don’t want copy protection at all. If an industry standard takes off, then they will be suck with it, but if no standard takes off, then the protection will eventually go away. So no.

    Finally, in this context there is a conflict between security and openness. That very openness is used to break it.

  • GeorgeS

    “And if Ultraviolet really works, it means he’d be letting someone else manage Apple customers’ media, and letting all that work he’s put in to nurturing the Mac/iTunes/iOS ecosystem go to waste.”

    To Pandora, Kindle, Nook, etc., add Netflix. Apple seems to have no problem with other companies providing content on iOS devices. (The Mac is not an issue.)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VU7AU3OXETGPHFXHYRLI3PWH5U Disappointed

    I believe Apple makes big bucks from iTunes. It is a give them the razor, sell them the blade type concept. Ultraviolet and/or such a concept, if brought to fruition, is a significant reason why Apple may desire to acquire Akamai. Either way, this is a win for Akamai.

  • Anonymous

    It’s not a good idea in ‘theory’, it’s a good idea in PRACTICE, on the iTunes store.

    This is just another attempted coup for lame companies to band together and try to wrestle control from Apple by using their own ideas against them in a way which would never actually work. They are just looking to cut down Apple in any way they can, meanwhile, Apple is saving their business for them by helping them adapt to new ways easily, and yet they would rather stay stuck in the past, where Windows was relevant and everyone still bought CDs and software on plastic disks.

    Let Apple host the content if you want to sell it to me or at least make a great iPhone/iPod or Mac app if you want me to look at it. Why do they have to attack apple over this and insist they sign away something or other or have to ‘agree’ with them? Or what? It’s inherently threatening, but they are not in a position of power. Apple will let them release a GREAT iPod or iPhone or Mac app! Are you kidding me? They don’t block anyone that contributes. Then again, this is less of a ‘contribution’ and more that group of competitors are trying to complicate what is already drop dead great in the iTunes store to begin with. I will use the real deal, not the lame copy, thanks.

  • Anonymous

    “Once upon a time, industry standard was a term applies to a situation where the whole industry got together to agree something for the benefit of the consumer.”

    I remember those days. No wait, that was an alternate universe that doesn’t even exist.

    Companies and people have always acted in their own interest.

  • Anonymous

    That makes no sense at all. It’s the opposite, it’s sell them an iPod or iPhone or iPad (that is UNDENIABLY where Apple makes it’s money) and make the content available, so long as the quality and performance are good (no pathetic FLASH video, it kills performance and battery life for no real benefit).

    Revenue from iTunes is building, but the idea at least up to this point is to make the content as affordable as possible, and just to earn enough to keep the store bandwith costs at bay. A $.99 song only gets Apple about $.07 and that has to pay for bandwidth, credit charges (micropayments even) etc…

    For apps and books Apple’s take is 30%, however that is, once again, FAR LESS than what the earlier models cost for printing, distribution, sales commission, etc… so the actual content providers are actually making MORE money, not less. (And complaining about it all the way to the bank, wishing they had set up iTunes I guess, for themselves.)

  • http://www.digitalfool.wordpress.com Digital Fool

    I appreciate your skepticism! My big questions – Apple’s support aside – are, quite simply:

    Will customers care? Does the mass customer out there think in terms of clouds and locker services?

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

So there’s no such thing as work-life balance. There’s work, and there’s life, and there’s no balance.

— Sheryl Sandberg, in an interview for the PBS/AOL digital and broadcast series “Makers: Women Who Make America”