John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

Could Nokia's Miracle Be Microsoft?

Now that Nokia has a new CEO, should it adopt a new smartphone strategy as well? There are strong arguments on both sides. On the one hand, Nokia has put an awful lot of money and effort into Symbian^3 and MeeGo, the mobile operating systems with which it hopes to regain high-end leadership in the industry. On the other, the person who defined that strategy, former CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasvuo, was ousted last September after an ugly 70 percent decline in Nokia’s market value.

Should Stephen Elop, Nokia’s new CEO, continue executing the strategy established by his ousted predecessor, strengthening it by improving execution and operating costs? Or should he map out an entirely new strategy, perhaps one based on a third-party operating system. Canaccord Genuity analyst T. Michael Walkley favors the latter, suggesting Nokia make the jump to Android or Windows Phone 7. And interestingly, he feels WP7 is the better option of the two.

Why?

Well, for one thing, Elop is a Microsoft veteran. He seems to have left the company on good terms and presumably still has close ties to it. For another, Microsoft and Nokia are a better cultural fit than Google and Nokia. And finally, the two companies need each other to succeed in the mobile market long term.

“We believe Microsoft needs more support from a leading device OEM to compete with Android longer term and Nokia likely needs to adopt a new high-end smartphone strategy to stem smartphone share losses,” Walkley says. “Further, Microsoft could create a differentiated tablet strategy with stronger enterprise support and Nokia could clearly benefit with a tablet and smartphone combined strategy that is offered by competitors….We believe the combination of Microsoft’s marketing muscle and software expertise with WP7 and Nokia’s global brand, distribution and scale advantages could drive solid sales of WP7-based devices worldwide. Additionally, it would provide Nokia a much-needed re-entry into the North American market, where its market share has stagnated at low-single-digit levels for multiple years.”

In other words, a Nokia-Microsoft alliance could bolster the WP7 ecosystem to the point where WP7 becomes a third dominant mobile OS alongside Android and iOS.

That would suit Microsoft–which has been struggling with mobile for years–just fine. But what about Nokia, which still makes quite a bit of money selling feature phones in the BRIC countries?


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    Why change a perfectly good OS(Symbian) with WP7?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_3P4G3S2ZQOWR2WU2ALDIJZRH6A Bhairav

    If all things digital is going in by this ideology.That by adopting policies as these a company will be able to recover itself .Afraid will have to change sites i used to swear by you guys and cnet!!!
    Do you want your readership to go down ???
    Please stop posting these embarrassing articles!!!

  • http://www.davidafenton.com DavidAFenton

    I think a merger is a better idea. Microsoft needs to have their own hardware like xbox. Android 3.0 is going to be tough to beat as a 3rd party mobile OS. A vertical approach is the only way forward

  • http://www.aqute.com AquteIntel

    Two struggling brands in the mobile space, sounds like a variation on the Microsoft-Yahoo! gambit.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dreyfus2 Uwe Rueckeshaeuser

    The main problem with this idea are the established workflows at Nokia (several Nokia staff has talked about that in public). Nokia designs the hardware first, and then the software guys have to rush to tweak/bend the software to support the hardware features. That shows. The hardware is often good, the OS core is good, the GUI and the included apps are junk. Going for WP7, a system with licensing terms pretty much including the entire hardware specs, will cause severe concerns in the almighty hardware engineering group, and becoming a me-too provider for almost identical WP7 phones (you can’t barely tell the existing models apart), will not help them either.

    Nokia is between a rock and a hard place. Symbian is too far behind in usability, MeGoo is far from ready (for regular consumers), they did not buy Palm, and adding another 20 Android handsets to the existing 200 won’t help them at all – let’s not forget: Nokia’s problem is not “no smartphone sales”, or “market share in the US”, they sell plenty of smartphones and if they can have the rest of the world, they can do without US carriers and their demands. Their problem is the profit they make from smartphone sales (Apple generates more profit from two phones than Nokia from all phones including feature phones). An indistinguishable product using Android or WP7 won’t do nothing for them. They need an own platform, an own ecosystem, and finally somebody with the faintest clue about GUI design (for the phone OS and their stores – they all cause eye-cancer right now). This will take more time, but it is the only reasonable thing to do.

  • Winski

    Aren’t they the same company already??? Developers seem to be the same group of wandering sheep… Whether it’s Espoo or Redmond doesn’t seem to matter.

  • Anonymous

    I think it would be a great move but Nokia needs it far more than Microsoft.

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    Let’s hope so. Maybe they could still merge Yahoo in there too. More weight, sinks faster.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

I break down a product the same way I break down a character I’m going to play. I try to get inside the mind of that person — the user, the consumer — and figure out why they’re doing something and what they want from it.

— Ashton Kutcher’s investing philosophy