John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

ISS Calls for Apple CEO Succession Plan

Apple doesn’t want to divulge its executive succession plan, but it may soon have to. With CEO Steve Jobs on indefinite medical leave for an undisclosed condition and the company’s annual meeting scheduled for Feb. 23, support is growing for a shareholder proposal that would require Apple to explain what it plans to do should Jobs step down.

Now backing the measure: The Laborers’ International Union of North America and Institutional Shareholder Services, one of the most influential proxy advisory outfits around.

“ISS believes that shareholders would benefit by having a report on the company’s succession plans disclosed annually,” ISS said. “Such a report would enable shareholders to judge the board on its readiness and willingness to meet the demands of succession planning based on the circumstances at that time.”

That may be so, but according to Apple, which recommends shareholders vote against it, such a report would also give the company’s rivals unfair advantage by publicizing its objectives and plans and would undermine its efforts to recruit and retain champion executives. “The company takes succession planning seriously, and the board has adopted a comprehensive process to ensure continuity and maintain the superior quality of its management team,” Apple said in its 2011 proxy statement. “This process also allows flexibility to adjust to unanticipated changes in the market.”

What it doesn’t allow for is transparency, something investors might appreciate with Jobs now on his third medical leave from Apple.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    Poor little darlings … so put upon by the 1000% return on investment Apple provided for them during the last 10 years.

  • Anonymous

    “Apple doesn’t want to divulge its executive succession plan. But it may soon have to.”

    A lot of very loud traders want this. They make money out of instability, which they often cause themselves.

    Real investors in Apple will be hard to persuade, because they will understand that Apple is protecting their interests by avoiding the mischief that this information would be used for.

    And bluntly unless the investors are willing to sack the Apple board over this issue, in order to find out what the succession plan was before they sacked them, then I really don’t see how they are going to force this.

    But I love the headline

    “Investors sack Steve Jobs to find out what happens”

  • Anonymous

    The Laborers’ International Union of North America holds a measly 11,000 shares. I know enough people personally to out vote them. This stupid proposal is made either by stupid people, or perhaps by parties that hold more shares of Apple competitors than of Apple.

  • Anonymous

    I think I can vote this proposal down myself, I have more shares than the ISS, interestingly enough, since buying them at 12, they’ve split 2 times driving my cost to 3.00. Since I can demonstrate a more than 100x return on my money in less than 10 years, I think I should run the ISS’s investments.
    Clearly I have what it takes and I DON”T ASK APPLE TO DO STUPID THINGS JUST BECAUSE I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I”M DOING.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

While it’s tempting to see the Huffington Post’s Pulitzer as a “big win for new media,” or something like that, the real story is that these organizations — the Huffington Post, the New York Times, the Washington Post — are becoming more like each other. Old media and new media are increasingly antiquated terms.

— Journalism professor Jay Rosen to HuffPo media writer Michael Calderone (via GigaOM)