John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

Huawei to U.S.: I'm Ready for My Examination, Doctor

In an open letter published today, telecommunications equipment maker Huawei called upon the U.S. government to conduct a formal probe into “misperceptions” that it is backed by the Chinese government and lacks respect for intellectual property rights.

“The allegation that Huawei somehow poses a threat to the national security of the United States has centered on a mistaken belief that our company can use our technology to steal confidential information in the United States or launch network attacks on entities in the U.S at a specific time,” Huawei Chariman Ken Hu wrote. “There is no evidence that Huawei has violated any security rules….If the United States government has any real concerns of this nature about Huawei, we would like to clearly understand those concerns, and whether they relate to the past or future development of our company….We sincerely hope that the United States government will carry out a formal investigation on any concerns it may have about Huawei.”

A brazen move for Huawei, perhaps even a measure of last resort. But after the events of the past few years, why not? The company’s efforts to gain a foothold in the U.S. market have been thwarted time and again by national-security concerns. In 2008 such anxieties forced it to abandon a $2.2 billion deal to acquire network equipment vendor 3Com. And just days ago they foiled its $2 million deal to acquire the assets of 3Leaf Systems.

So why not call the U.S. government’s bluff on concerns that it’s a threat to national security? Certainly, it obliterates U.S. calls for transparency and goes a long way towards resolving the trust issues plaguing the company in the States. And it puts Washington in a conflicted position: Either disclose the evidence it has against Huawei that’s keeping the company out of the market, or admit that there isn’t any.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1296601384 Phillip Woon

    Nope, it’s not about security concerns. It’s market protection, pure and simple. Just say it is, or continue being hypocritical about Chinese market protectionism

  • http://tinyurl.com/CowboyBooksBlog fgoodwin

    The “invitation” means nothing.

    The US Gov’t can investigate til Doomsday, Huawei and the Chinese Gov’t will ensure they find nothing. Should we then conclude there is no relationship?

    Of course not: “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”.

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    No doubt foreign companies play dirty.

    But then too so do domestic ones, particularly the large established ones.

    If the government allowed more small domestic chip companies to thrive in the US the foreign ones wouldn’t have such an easy time of it. This is why I refer to Intel and Microsoft as the GM and Chrysler of computing. Shoddy products that elbow out the upstarts and not only get away with it but are HELPED by intrusive government regulations (that are not matched by anything overseas).

    The results will be the same too. You know that old saying.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

So there’s no such thing as work-life balance. There’s work, and there’s life, and there’s no balance.

— Sheryl Sandberg, in an interview for the PBS/AOL digital and broadcast series “Makers: Women Who Make America”