John Paczkowski

Recent Posts by John Paczkowski

Apple's Area 51: The Truth Is Out There

Scheduled to go live sometime this spring, Apple’s 505,000-square-foot North Carolina data center is, according to COO Tim Cook, intended to support iTunes and MobileMe. But we don’t yet know in what capacity, and Cook’s remark, which is at once unambiguous and utterly cryptic, leaves plenty of room for speculation. And theories about the potential capabilities of this new facility abound.

In a research note this week, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi reviewed a few of the more plausible ones, which run the gamut from the long-rumored iTunes streaming service to the back end for a natural language voice interface and navigation service for its iOS devices.

The first: an easy way of scaling the company’s iAd mobile advertising program. With its installed base of iOS devices likely to hit 200 million by the end of fiscal 2011, iAds could put quite a strain on Apple’s ad serving capabilities. Says Sacconaghi, “If iAd gets traction while serving interactive, multimedia ads then Apple’s underlying advertising platform will need to be significantly larger, and at a scale comparable to Google’s or Microsoft’s ad platforms.”

The second is a no-brainer and seems fairly likely to pan out given recent chatter about Apple’s MobileMe service going free come April: an overhauled verision of MobileMe that provides improved cloud-based synchronization of data and media, along with meaningful storage capacity.

The low-cost iTunes subscription service we’ve been hearing about for years now is the third. Again, this seems a completely plausible use for Apple’s new data center, and as Sacconaghi notes, the time may finally be right for the company to launch it. “In our meeting with Apple executives last month, VP of Internet Services Eddy Cue suggested that the reason that music subscription services had failed to receive traction with consumers was because they were too expensive, highlighting prevailing rates of up to $15/month,” he wrote. “We note that an annual subscription to Napster now costs $8/month, while the paid version – unlimited, higher-quality, ad-free – of music streaming from Pandora costs $3/month.” Add to that Apple’s 2010 acquisition of streaming music outfit Lala and the traction Spotify and Pandora have been gaining in the market recently and this seems a likely scenario as well.

Fourth on Sacconaghi’s list, an aggressively priced video streaming service. Given the popularity of Netflix’s iOS app among iPhone and iPad users, it might make sense for Apple to offer its own competing video subscription service. Or, it could simply acquire Netflix. It’s not like Apple doesn’t have the money to do it–even if Netflix’s market cap is north of $11 billion.

And finally there’s that voice interface and navigation service I mentioned earlier. This one might seem a stretch, but don’t dismiss it out of hand. Last April, Apple acquired Siri, developer of a virtual personal assistant supported by speech recognition, natural language processing and semantic Web search. And in 2009 it purchased PlaceBase, a mapping outfit that specialized in enhancing maps with private and public data sets. Put those two acquisitions together with a massive data center and Sacconaghi’s theory looks at least plausible.

“Apple could offer its own navigation service comparable to Google’s free and very popular voice-based navigation system on Android,” he writes. “The iOS device user-base could then potentially periodically upload anonymous information on routes travelled and speeds encountered, perhaps even in real-time, which would allow Apple to report back traffic conditions to its user-base.”

Sounds like a killer feature for the iPhone 5, doesn’t it?

PREVIOUSLY:


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    I don’t know what Apple’s new data center is for, or the second one the same size. But it is great fun to speculate.

    But I can think of several options that would seriously frighten Google shareholders. Googles grip on it’s user base is much more tenuous than people understand, and without the access to the user base goes the leverage with the advertisers. And no, I’m not thinking of a traditional search engine.

  • $330AShareMakesMeVerySad>8-(

    My one hope is that the data center will provide a free storage locker for iOS users and streaming content services would definitely be a plus. Apple has far too much cash to be sitting around unused while lesser companies are buying up everything in sight in order to expand their services.

    I just don’t know why Apple let Netflix slip away when it would have been a perfect fit for Apple with its 200 million credit card accounts to provide an additional user base to what Netflix already had. Does Netflix really have a bigger server complex than Apple’s that allows it to do what Apple can’t? Apple’s iTMS seems crippled in comparison to Netflix’s streaming capabilities in terms of volume.

    I’m only guessing, but it appears Apple can only take on so many things at one time and it probably already has its hand’s filled with supplying hardware to consumers and it seems to be doing a capable job since quarterly revenue continues to increase but it still doesn’t seem to be pleasing Wall Street or investors which I don’t quite understand.

  • http://www.marketingtactics.com/ davebarnes

    @John
    scenario = singular
    scenari = plural
    Think back to your high school Italiano lessons.

  • Anonymous

    I lost interest in what Apple would do in cloud services long ago. They’re really, really late to this party. Dropbox and Rdio and Netflix fill the gaps nicely on iOS, so if Apple ever gets its act together, I’ll pay attention. Until then, the speculation is boring.

  • http://www.youtube.com/dfmediainc Triny D

    Apple can turn on a Netflix competitor in two seconds.

  • Anonymous

    They are late but it’s still early in the game. The advantage that Apple has over these other services is integration.

    No music streaming service has been incredibly successful yet and the content owners are setting up for a war with Netflix.

    As for Dropbox, it is limited in its capabilities. Dropbox can’t cut the cord from iTunes on the desktop, can’t backup your iDevice and the info within those applications. That is the potential of what MobileMe can be. It can turn the iPad into an independent device.

  • zato

    All Things D will soon need a data center as big as Apple’s to store its vast library of “photos-that-make-Steve-Jobs-look-like-the-antichrist”.

  • Anonymous

    Just because they built a new data center doesn’t necessarily mean they have to offer new products and services. iTunes as-is requires massive amounts of server space and bandwidth. Add on to that MobileMe, Apple’s website, and Apple’s corporate needs, plus room for future growth, and there’s the reason you build a data center.

    Not saying they won’t be improving their products, as always, but I think it happens independent of this data center.

  • Canucker

    Netflix could have brought on anti-trust issues and, more importantly, their media agreements with the studios likely have a poison pill clause negating them in case of take-over by the likes of Apple, Google, etc. The studios tolerate Netflix as it keeps their options open. The value of Netflix is almost entirely in those agreements. No content, no company.

  • http://twitter.com/JoeTierney Joe Tierney

    Please be streaming iTunes!

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    Well I was going to say how bad it is that all of this speculation puts them up against well established incumbents with profit margins far lower than Apple is used to make. If what you are suggesting is true, that they are just doing this to keep up with existing needs, then that is even worse. A couple of things that are still missing:

    (1) For streaming services or other such content provision they only NEED one copy or at most a few of each track of music, video file, etc being offered (for backup purposes) not a copy per user purchase etc. What they need instead is bandwidth to serve up all that stuff. That means putting data centers all over the country/world, not just in NC. So in that sense I’d go with the moble ME notion since storing multiple gigs of user data would indeed need a lot of floorspace.

    (2) Regardless of the content being served up, it’s still quite a tough market to beak into with so many incumbents who have largely covered their infrastructure costs by now (and are just building incrementally). It might all be worth it if it helps them continue selling $400 computers for $1200 and with any luck they will be scaring the dickens out of Microsoft before anyone else.

    So it better be good, whatever it is. And I’m still mostly intrigued by what kind of hardware is in there and what operating system it is running. I have a feeling they might have more reasons to be secretive about that than anything else.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, you have to admit that is like totally cool!

    http://www.real-privacy.it.tc

  • KenG

    So do they run OS X server on all of their servers in their data centers? I just can’t see them running Linux, but do they run Apache and other open source server apps? Do they port the linux apps to their basically Unix OS?

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    Exactly.

    The web server bundled with all copies of OS X is Apache I believe (or at least it has been), so that is a safe bet. But Apple doesn’t vend rack-mount servers any more, unless they are only making them for their own exclusive use. And not having a large customer base for their own server software in my opinion makes it’s use internally questionable.

    Mind you I don’t think there would be anything *wrong* with them using established Linux clusters, virtual servers, and so on, except from a marketing point of view. That would have to accompany them totally washing their hands of the server business. Of course if they did that they could also just be leasing space all over the country tweaking demand hot-spots etc. But these data centers either say they are doing something totally different, or just totally ill advised.

  • Anonymous

    Just a quick reminder that Apple has never been first in any of the markets it has entered. But when it enters a market is comes in very, very strongly.

    4G, NFC, and this data center are all examples of areas that Apple appears to not be in yet. Others are trying to stake their claim on these areas and Apple seems to be leaving them behind.

    However, Apple tends to follow people to market with better ways of doing things. 4G for example isn’t really worked out yet with the term being applied very loosely at the moment and many 3G services which are getting faster are simply being renamed 4G… I expect Apple to enter this market when 4G actually exists as a mainstream product.

    NFC again these are very early days for this technology in America.

    The data center / cloud computing / cloud services I expect to hit the market when Apple is good and ready… But it will have an impact on the way others approach this.

  • http://blog.macb.net macbeach

    HA! 

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

He’s an a–hole. That guy has $2 billion that he made from figuring out ways to steal royalties from artists, and that’s the bottom line. You can’t really trust anybody like that.

— Black Keys drummer Patrick Carney on why he’s not a fan of Sean Parker