Arik Hesseldahl

Recent Posts by Arik Hesseldahl

Is Cisco Undervalued? At Least One Analyst Thinks So.

Shares in the networking giant Cisco Systems are trading at more than 38 percent off their 52-week high and haven’t recovered a bit since investors shunned it following an earnings report that contained a relatively negative outlook. Today, in a research note to clients, Brent Bracelin, an analyst with Pacific Crest Securities in Portland, Ore., made the case that investors aren’t giving it enough credit.

The way Bracelin sees it, sales in Cisco’s new business lines such as Unified Computing System–Cisco’s cloud hardware offering–as well as wireless LAN and collaboration products, could triple to $10 billion in 2013 from $3.3 billion in 2009, and could generate a combined operating margin of 25 percent and could account for 20 percent of overall sales.

Too iffy for you? There’s more. Yes, investors are clearly unhappy with the drop in sales of switching products, historically an important Cisco business segment and indeed its biggest segment so far, accounting for 31 percent of sales last year. And they should be unhappy about it. But? Cisco’s non-switching business is on pace to deliver $30 billion in sales this year, Bracelin says, more than double what it did in 2005. This means the non-switching business is growing at a compound annual growth rate of 12 percent, more than double the five percent seen in switching. If all goes well the contribution to earnings of the non-switching business to per-share earnings could be 97 cents in fiscal 2011 and could reach $1.50 by 2014.

Still not convinced? There’s more. The sell-off has pushed Cisco’s valuation metrics to significant lows versus its peers in the tech industry. At $17 a share, Cisco’s market cap of $94 billion works out to an enterprise value to EBITDA ratio of less than five. By comparison, Microsoft trades at more than six times EV/EBITDA, IBM’s ratio is north of eight, Oracle’s is about 10 and Qualcomm’s is nearly 13.

And? That $40 billion in cash that Cisco has on its books is worth more than $5 a share. Meanwhile, investors have turned up their noses at Cisco’s switching business to such an extent that they now value it at only $3 a share while the non-switching business is valued at more than $9 a share. In 2008, the switching business was valued at more than $8 a share. “The sell-off, based on competition and margin erosion, now appears overstated,” Bracelin wrote.

So what does he think it’s worth? Add up all the parts and you get a company that could be valued at anywhere from $20 to $28 a share. And that’s assuming the value of the switching business improves only a little bit. All in all, Cisco shares could be undervalued at anywhere from 17 percent on the low end to 63 percent on the high end.

Investors, however–at least for today–didn’t buy Bracelin’s argument. Cisco shares fell 11 cents to close at $17.04 a share. That’s only seven cents a share higher than its 52-week low from last month.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_27DDTW7KPYZHY2T7YBSTIJWQKU Chic Goods
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XV6JRVOLHZBODIO2MAGR4MGKWQ ed

    The intrinsic value of CSCO is clearly > $20. But the market doesn’t buy it anymore and the company’s management seems to be burned.
    So, who is right and what can be done about it? That’s what I’d like to read somewhere..
    Ed Van Lier

  • Anonymous

    Apple is now trading at 11 to 12 times P/E…

  • Anonymous

    Most of the arguments for owning or buying CSCO are based on valuation metrics but the problem with the company is qualitative, mainly the leadership. The board of directors does not care about shareholders and doesn’t appear to be independent vis a vis John Chambers, who has no incentive to move the stock price because he has taken enough money out of the company for himself to last 100 lifetimes. He’s never bought a share on the open market with his own money. I can’t blame him, if I had ten figures in the bank I would have a hard time finding the fire and motivation needed to run a big company. Show me a guy who needs to make rent this month or scrape together some money to feed the kids and I will show you someone with some motivation. He’s too comfortable, he’s bored, and the board of directors is providing no checks and balances. The company is fairly valued because he is unfit to lead it.

  • http://nigeltufnel.myopenid.com/ Nigel Tufnel

    The same Brent Bracelin who, in 2007, rated Dell as “Outperform”? When their stock was at $23, and now is at $14? THAT Brent Bracelin?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=515879132 Shawn Edward

    For Cisco to succeed they should do as follows:

    1.Shake up management and change the board of directors.
    2.John Chambers must go. Resign. Before csco becomes a 10 dollar stock.
    3.Cut a deal with the US government to bring back the 40 billion dollars from Scotland.
    4.Offer a special 3-5% DIV
    5.Get rid of Linksys… and others…
    6.Concentrate on the key cores of there business.
    7.Make acquisitions that will benefit csco and make them grow
    maybe buy (FFIV?,or others)
    8. Hire me

    Doing all this will make csco a 28$ stock
    If not it will continue to go down

  • http://twitter.com/Fandango36 Phil

    Love the ideas. Only a matter of time before CSCO lights up the screen again. IU am long straddles and 2012 calls that I gladly paid up for. They will not make it toooo obvious though. The company needs a little time to buy back stock at CHEAP and INEXPENSIVE prices. They have made 20BB in acquisitions in the past 10 years and when they take out FFIV their stock will trade up 8% on it. This company has already admitted its “old age” with the dividend now they are going to throw their old man strength around and get yound again with FFIV. ITS A NATURAL. Wall Street is selling you the idea they are out of the game by backing away from the bidside. Dont believe the hype. Be smart money and BUY it.

  • Anonymous

    Arik, you are missing the critical factor. Cisco’s stock price is driven by gross margin not cash. When they went after Linksys and other lower margin businesses the switching & routing revenue was much greater in % terms, but now that these businesses are gaining ground on the core business, overall margins are coming down. Interestingly, nobody really talks about the fact that there is only 5 companies in the world who can build a core router. Freescale makes the chips for many since at least one company stole Cisco’s code running on Freescale chips. This is not a digression; the point is Cisco is a software company and should be developing and buying companies (Like EMC bought VM ware) that will keep it growing and keep margins high. Software, Applications & Services. That is the future for Cisco. If not, they will go the way of Lucent – this may be a bad analogy since Lucent is starting to take share back and is up nearly 100% in the past six months ( and Lucent one of the 5).

  • Anonymous

    Maybe an FFIV acquisition would help but “lighting up the screen” is a stretch for this totally broken stock and company. This is a deeply troubled company with an absolutely horrible CEO, the worst in tech. Buy it now or buy it at $9 or $10 after the next four earnings misses with this bozo running the company off a cliff. If Chambers is fired, the stock goes up 50%.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

So there’s no such thing as work-life balance. There’s work, and there’s life, and there’s no balance.

— Sheryl Sandberg, in an interview for the PBS/AOL digital and broadcast series “Makers: Women Who Make America”