Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Maybe Cord Cutting Isn't Here Yet. What About Cord Shaving?

Here’s an answer that might satisfy the two sides in the “Cord cutting is real! No it isn’t!” debate: Perhaps Web video fans aren’t dumping cable in favor of Netflix, Hulu, etc. Perhaps they’re just dumping premium cable channels, like HBO.

We can call this the “cord shaving” argument, and if I could remember where I first saw the term, I’d be happy to give them credit. (My hunch is that it was BTIG Research’s Rich Greenfield. Or maybe digital-media-executive-turned-aggregator Jason Hirschhorn. Or maybe Video Nuze, etc.).

This one has a nice ring of logic to it: You’d have to be a very committed non-cable watcher to dump your entire service and make do with the Web stuff. But depending on your viewing habits, it might be quite easy to substitute, say, Netflix for HBO.

It would be cheaper, too–you’d just have to wait a while to see “Boardwalk Empire” or “Game of Thrones.” (Though I’d still pay a premium to see Kenny Powers.)*

And that may be what we’re starting to see now.

Here, for instance, is a new study from Accenture that draws a connection between Web video watchers and a drop in premium cable: It figures the Internet is responsible for an eight percent drop in subscriptions.

Alas, just as with the cord-cutting debate, we may be stuck, for a while, with competing sets of data.

Market researcher SNL Kagan, for instance, says that in the last quarter of 2010, subscriptions shot up for CBS’ Showtime and Liberty’s Starz, while Time Warner’s HBO stayed steady.

These are apples and oranges data points: The Accenture numbers are taken worldwide, while the Kagan numbers are U.S.-only. And they cover different time periods, too. Etc.

Still, there’s a reason why Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes has been so forceful about bashing Netflix publicly. Investors, at least, are concerned that the Web service (and perhaps Web video in general) will indeed cut into HBO’s business. So this won’t be the last we hear about this one.

And here’s one of the least unsafe-for-work Kenny Powers clips I could find. But it is still not going to be safe for some workplaces. It is awesome, though:

* For the concerned reader who inquired: No, you can’t get anything HBO shows via Netflix’ streaming service. But if you’re patient enough, and you subscribe to the DVD tier of the service, you’ll be able to get the shows and movies that way.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • Anonymous

    This one has a nice ring of logic to it: You’d have to be a very committed non-cable watcher to dump your entire service and make do with the Web stuff, but depending on your viewing habits, it might be quite easy to substitute, say, Netflix for HBO.

    If people are dropping their Premium Channel subscriptions for the internet, then it’s the Premium Channel companies’ fault. Look at HBO – the only way to get their content aside from waiting for it to come out on DVD is to pay for the television service. You can’t even get an online-only plan for the same (or higher) subscription price!

    Which is a real pity. Video on Demand is a god-send for serialized shows, since you don’t have to worry about missing an episode and being left behind. Not to mention that the first premium channel to offer their own online-only plan would likely gain an advantage over the other Premium Channels.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=685960955 Geary Kwong

    I took it one step further… Cut my land line(phone) along with my satellite TV service. Do everything through my iPhone. Have broadband and Netflix if I want a movie. I thought it would be more difficult, but don’t miss it much… Nothing really compelling to watch on TV anyways.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    I do think there are decent odds that HBO and/or Showtime offers a Web-only offering, at cable pricing, w/in the next few years.

  • http://brandingme.tumblr.com/ Adrian Palacios

    peter,
    i feel like all the studies i see and all the talk that goes in the cord cutting vs. no cord cutting have to do with the *loss* of subscribers. i think it’s more complicated than that.

    are there any numbers that deal with how many people simply don’t sign up for cable at all?

    my parents had cable. once i graduated from college and moved to nyc, i never paid for cable tv. i had one roommate for six months that paid for cable tv himself, but, the point is, ever since i left home i have never paid for cable tv. so even though i’m not exactly a “cord-cutter”, i also never had the cord hooked up in the first place.

    the only service i’ve ever paid for from a cable company is my internet subscription. and i have a feeling that if i polled my friends, there would be some who followed a similar path.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Yup, I think about that all the time, and others are as well.
    http://gigaom.com/video/cable-.....A+Video%29

  • Fanfoot

    The countervailing force is cable’s willingness to promote the channel would go down. When Direct TV stopped promoting HBO during their carriage battle, HBO lost a lot of subscribers. Presumably a lack of support from Comcast et al would have a similar effect.

    Plus in HBO’s case in particular there’s just no getting around the fact that their exclusive content just isn’t up to snuff anymore. Yes I’m still talking about the loss of The Sopranos.

  • Fanfoot

    @Peter,

    Yup. This is certainly the easier of the trends to spot right now. With any number of ways to watch movies these days, including via VOD offerings from the cable companies themselves, much of the reason to subscribe to a channel like HBO is gone. Sure they still have some exclusive shows like True Blood, but I assume that in the past a lot of customers would have subscribed for just the movies (those that aren’t big fans of the show say) or would justify the $20 per month cost on the basis of both.

    Also of course the rising cost of cable TV in particular, the new need to subscribe to a digital tier, and HD, and … before you can even think about HBO… has a lot of people thinking twice.

    Let alone the competition between ANYTHING you spend time on (internet browsing, gaming, etc) and TV watching.

    I might even throw in the HD shift–I’ve pretty much stopped watching all the SD channels now that I have an HD setup. And so instead of 8 or 10 HBO channels I really only look at the one or two that Comcast offers me in HD now. Which makes it seem like I’m getting less for my money.

  • http://twitter.com/JasonHirschhorn JasonHirschhorn

    http://twitter.com/#!/JasonHir.....7209494528

    @JasonHirschhorn: “Cord cutting or trimming? Seems like those in immediate danger are pay tv channels not the basic cable.”

  • http://brandingme.tumblr.com/ Adrian Palacios

    i like that: “cord nevers”. thanks for the link.

  • elias.anderson

    Having been a COX cable customer up until I switched to satellite four years ago, I’m not sure I’d want them to be in charge of my phone service. When I switched to DISH Network their customer service was and remains awesome. My bill went down, while my channel selection went up. I work at one of their call centers now, but before I was a DISH employee I recommended the service to friends and family based on my great experience with them.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

When I first heard about Facebook, in 2005, I thought it was really stupid. And the same with eBay 20 years earlier.

— Reed Hastings, in a talk with Wired staff at its London offices