Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Wired's Newest iPad Issue Boasts Its Best Feature Yet: Free

Remember when iPad magazine apps–and Wired’s app in particular–were big news? That was a year ago.

Now Wired would like to remind you that it’s still publishing on the iPad, and the Conde Nast title is offering a pretty good incentive to give it another look: Its newest issue, which should go online today, will be free.

The one-time promotion comes via a sponsorship from Adobe. Which shouldn’t be a surprise, given that Adobe and Wired have been working hand in hand on tablet publishing for nearly two years now.

Wired has also added a few more bells and whistles to the app, including the ability to share stories via Facebook and Twitter. There’s also an e-commerce partnership with Amazon, where  readers can purchase items the magazine writes about via the online store, but without leaving the magazine app itself.

None of that is revolutionary, but it does show you how relatively crude Wired’s first app edition was when it launched last May. In retrospect, for instance, it seems astonishing that it hasn’t had social media links: Any app that launched without them now would be hooted down.

So. Twelve issues in, how’s the app performing on the business side? Conde won’t share many details; Wired publisher Howard Mittman says that monthly download totals have settled into the 20,000 to 30,000 range. That’s down considerably from the first issue, which racked up more than 100,000 downloads, but not surprising.

Those figures might well go up if Conde Nast decides to work with Apple’s subscription plan, which would likely lead to a lower per-issue cost. But I wouldn’t hold my breath.

On the other hand, Mittman says that advertisers are even more willing to bet on the app than they were a year ago. Which is surprising, and contrary to what I’ve heard from other publishers about their own titles. Mittman won’t release figures, but he says that today’s issue will generate more advertising dollars than Wired’s first issue a year ago.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://www.tablazines.com Tablazines

    “That’s down considerably from the first issue, which racked up more than 100,000 downloads, but not surprising.” – It’s hard to believe people are still focusing on it being down from the first issue. Of course it was. The first issue was a curiosity and people that weren’t Wired readers picked it up to see what all the fuss was about.

    20k-30k each issue is damn good. This is in addition to their newsstand copies and they don’t have to worry about printing, shipping and handling returns.

    They are doing well.

  • http://profiles.google.com/psesinando Pedro Monteiro

    Dear Peter,

    Not that it is Wired case, but when you say that all apps should have social media links, what about media publishers that don’t publish their printed content on their websites?
    How can their apps allow for social media sharing?
    This is a question that I’ve been thinking about and would love to have your thoughts on it.
    Thank you so much
    Best regards

  • Mike C

    Afraid the added features won’t fix the biggest problem with the WIRED iPad version; the fact that you run the risk of losing your purchased issues every time they release an update. Until per issue pricing comes down (with reliable billing and storage of downloaded issues) or reasonable subscription options are available, WIRED and other digital editions won’t become as mainstream as they could/should. You would think a tech magazine would have figured out how to solve that problem after a year…

  • http://www.digitalundivide.com donfelipe

    Many sites are giving away iPad covers, but you can get a free iPad 2 on my website if you follow certain conditions.

  • Anonymous

    lol, you just gotta love free. Cant go wrong with that lol.
    http://www.internet-privacy.pro.tc

  • Anonymous

    The problem isn’t just that the app sucks, it’s that the magazine sucks.

  • Anonymous

    There are 200 million people who can 1-click to buy. All of them “wired.” Wired is selling terribly.

  • Anonymous

    Obviously, you publish a basic version on the Web. That is what the Web is best at. Tiny pictures. Free. Sharable.

    Then in an app, you can make the story about 10,000 times richer. You have better interactivity, typography, you have standardized video, you have essentially infinite bandwidth (an app can be up to 2GB, and it all downloads before it is run). Costs $2.99.

    But even without that, you can easily share the contents of an app by just putting some or all of the content into an email message, Facebook post, etc. An app can do anything, it is native C with a sophisticated desktop class framework, made with the same tools that were used to create the World Wide Web, Mac OS X, and iOS.

    There aren’t any excuses.

  • http://twitter.com/cooljames James Roche

    What’s up, Troll? At that rate, why isn’t the JohnDoey app selling 200 million copies?

    Listen. No app that doesn’t do your laundry for you is going to run off the charts. For a crummy magazine on an elite device, 20k is a zillion.

  • http://twitter.com/cooljames James Roche

    Again, I’ll be the first guy to post a positive response when “JohnDoey Monthly” impresses me. Until then, boo on you.

  • http://www.tablazines.com Tablazines

    Definitely…

  • http://www.tablazines.com Tablazines

    Your logic is totally flawed. Even if there were 200 million iPad owners… that doesn’t automatically make them Wired’s audience.

    On the Newstands Wired sells about 90k (out of how many people on the planet). On a machine that only has 4% househould penetration in the US. 20k-30k is damned good!!!

    That was a totally dumb argument… I’m sorry…

  • http://www.tablazines.com Tablazines

    Ahhh no…. each issue can be archived. If an app update broke something, and didn’t allow you to re-download your past issues… best believe that it would be fixed

  • http://profiles.google.com/tomasvdb Tomas Van den Berckt

    i tried the Wired app months ago b/c where i live (outside US) the hard copy is difficult to get and i heard good things about the magazine. downloading the first issue took three days to resolve b/c of a bug in the app and then it turned out each copy is (or was) a few 100 meg in a pdf file (are you kidding me!). After that poor user experience, i also found that most of the magazine is good looking but meaningless fluff and no way i’m gonna pay for that.
    That said, i have been using the wired feed in Flipboard for a while now and that suits me perfectly so i won’t be switching back to the wired app, not even if it’s free.
    Good luck to all content owners coming up with a Flipboard business model though.

  • http://www.contentmarketing.dk Joakim Ditlev

    Looks like Wired is starting to get it: Don’t monetize your content when publishing digital magazines. The audience is what creates real value.

    Now they just need a version optimized for web and mobile browsers. That will ensure the traffic is kept on their site rather than people feed it from tools like Flipboard when reading on the iPad.

  • Anonymous

    You can subscribe to the print version of 83 cents per issue. Until the iPad option meets or beats this price, there will not be widespread adoption because it makes no sense economically.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Arguing online is like wearing a sharkskin vest. You look like a jerk.

— Anil Dash, in Businessweek’s How To issue