Liz Gannes

Recent Posts by Liz Gannes

How Google Killed GDrive and Spiked Its Skype Acquisition

This weekend I spent some time reading Steven Levy’s “In the Plex,” an account of the history of Google based on Levy’s deep embedding within the company (see Kara’s video interview with Levy from last week). The book as a whole is captivating, so I thought it might be worth highlighting a couple anecdotes about internal Google conflicts that previously never saw the light of day.

Levy relates that Sundar Pichai (the recently appointed SVP of Chrome who has been leading Google’s software projects for years) spiked Google’s GDrive storage service just prior to launch because he thought it was out of line with the cloud-based future. (Both Pichai and GDrive leader Bradley Horowitz spoke to Levy directly for his book.)

Google was about to launch a project it had been developing for more than a year, a free cloud-based storage service called GDrive. But Sundar had concluded that it was an artifact of the style of computing that Google was about to usher out the door. He went to Bradley Horowitz, the executive in charge of the project, and said, “I don’t think we need GDrive anymore.” Horowitz asked why not. “Files are so 1990,” said Pichai. “I don’t think we need files anymore.”

Horowitz was stunned. “Not need files anymore?”

“Think about it,” said Pichai. “You just want to get information into the cloud. When people use our Google Docs, there are no more files. You just start editing in the cloud, and there’s never a file.”

…Eventually they won people over by a logical argument–that it could be done, that it was the cloudlike thing to do, that it was the Google thing to do. That was the end of GDrive: shuttered as a relic of antiquated thinking even before Google released it. The engineers working on it went to the Chrome team.

In another longer section, Levy describes how Google product manager Wesley Chan, who had pushed for the company’s GrandCentral acquisition and was leading development on Google Voice, concocted and executed a plan to block Google from buying Skype, which it was seriously considering. (The timing and order of these events isn’t made explicit, which is a recurring issue through the book, but I’m a niggler for those details.)

Chan apparently bragged directly to Levy about his machinations:

With [Salar Kamangar and Sergey Brin] on board, Chan devised a plan to kill the Skype purchase. As he later described it, his scheme involved “laying grenades” at the executive meeting where the purchase was up for approval. Chan tricked the business development executive who was pushing the acquisition into thinking that he was in favor of the deal: he had even prepared a PowerPoint presentation with all the reasons Google should buy Skype. Chan says that halfway through the presentation, though, the trap sprang. Brin suddenly began asking questions that the deck didn’t address. “Who’s going to run this?” he demanded. “Not me,” said Kamangar. Craig Walker said he had two kids in school and wasn’t about to make regular runs to Eastern Europe. “What are the regulatory risks?” A lawyer said it might take months to get approval. Finally, Brin looked at Chan and asked why Google would want to take the risk to begin with. Chan dropped his defense entirely and began explaining why Google had no need for Skype.

“At that point,” recalls Chan, “Sergey gets up and says, ‘This is the dumbest shit I’ve ever seen.’ And Eric [Schmidt] gets up and walks out of the room. The deal’s off.”

Ruthless! Which of your darlings have you killed today?


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://twitter.com/chasmalloy Chas Malloy

    Sounds like an interesting read. Sure the old Cleesian dictate of Hyper Boil may be present, ultimately a first inside view.

  • http://twitter.com/chasmalloy Chas Malloy

    The Rose and thorn in the video interview was succinct and a great close to a brief but great primer.

  • http://twitter.com/spinchange spinchange

    Sometimes I’m not sure that I like knowing how the sausage is made.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WUYMYBRIBJB64XASMRH63JBBGI B0B

    The problem with this line of thinking is… it’s basically saying, we want the future to be “X” so let’s solve the problems for X and ignore the problems of the present.

    So, while it’s great and fine and dandy to solve these future problems, in the meantime it leaves a bunch of unsolved problems of *today*.

    For instance, it’s easy to say you don’t need “files”… but whether a song is in the cloud or a book is in the cloud, it is still essentially a single unit representing a particular type of data. So, whether it’s in the cloud or not, it can still be perceived as being a “file”. All of the data which exists today which were generated during the past 30+ years were created as files. So, while Google Docs gives us a means to get those files to the cloud, “GDrive” was supposed to be that solution to the problem of the transition. Until the computers we use at the office and until our friend’s computers are “cloud devices”, we need a solution for this transition. GDrive would have been that solution. It would have helped people to transition these 30+ years worth of files, get them online easily, and still allow us to work with technologies that aren’t completely in the cloud. Then, once the cloud is completely ubiquitous, you just kill the GDrive project and everything is already in the cloud.

    Since the GDrive project was killed prematurely, Google basically chose not to solve that problem and simply wait for people to find some other way into the cloud, which suggests Google isn’t really as serious about the cloud as they suggest. Dropbox is wonderful, but I’d prefer those files to be in Google’s cloud. At the moment, I don’t have that choice. I either need to wait for Google to release GDrive, or I need to keep using Dropbox. Since I don’t like using Dropbox’s web interface for files, I’m stuck using Dropbox only in the “files” paradigm and not the “cloud” paradigm. So, the fact that Google has refused to solve this problem and has forced me to rely on Dropbox, they have essentially forced me out of the cloud in the meantime. I want to be in the cloud, but until people solve the real-world problems of making the transition, many people are going to make a very slow transition into the cloud.

    Google Cloud connect is a prime example of making the transition into the cloud. The same argument for killing GDrive could have been made for Google Cloud connect, and yet Google Cloud connect is a really great thing that will bring more and more people to the cloud.

  • https://me.yahoo.com/a/FvxO3t08vsQQKuYk0vvON1Rwraz4vnXtFj0vtobdlSv9hbKJ#0b272 septentriones

    I like the reference but not this particular sausage or its making.

  • http://jpearls.myopenid.com/ earls

    AMEN.

  • http://mochachilo.wordpress.com Kartikay S

    Are you telling me that important business decisions about things that might eventually help the consumer are made like these?

    Thank god for startups!

  • http://profiles.google.com/shrek412 Damith Diunugala

    Hope Google won’t purchase the Dropbox and kill it

  • Anonymous

    But I guess there is something from Microsoft as well to save Ms office files online stuff?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joni-Salminen/1222314921 Joni Salminen

    Google Cloud Connect has many problems, so I don’t think it’s a good example of integrating cloud and legacy.

    There’s still plenty to do in the cloud space to get the masses in.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chi-Ken-Sup/1412956277 Chi Ken Sup

    If that’s how huge acquisition discussions are handled, and such “sophisticated” methods of sabotage are in work, than… that might explain why Gvoice sucks arse.

  • http://ARMdevices.net/ Charbax

    I’d love a Gdrive too. But you have to think about the mathematics also. Sundar Pinchai may have made a calculation about the number of servers needed, the number of hard drives needed, the amount of power needed once Google starts to suggest to the world that Google can host every file on the cloud, just pure Terrabytes/Petabytes/Bandwidth/Power consumption, that Gdrive service might suddenly become so huge, in terms of space, pollution, maintenance, that even if Google can monetize it by selling this cloud storage as a service, it may just not have been the clever thing to do yet.

    You have to consider when Google does something like this, they dominate the world with it overnight. And a Gdrive might use more than Gmail/Docs/Calendar/Apps combined in processing/storage/bandwidth/Power and thus might just not fit into how Google wants to upgrade its infrastructure.

    Anyways, I am also sure the Gdrive is kind of coming with Chrome OS, that each Chrome OS laptop gets something like 100GB free storage on the cloud, automatically synchronized. And Docs will become even more of a cloud storage service. But also, I think Google is going to combine that with Content distribution, so your Mp3, DivX and MKV files can all be stored on the cloud for free, iun exchange for Google trying to provide global content subscription memberships, so you can somehow get access to all Mp3, DivX and MKV on Google servers as streaming or downloading legally for about $10/month.

  • http://blog.wassupy.com/search/label/Technology Michael Haren

    I’d love a GDrive also, but I think you’re underestimating the work required to launch and maintain such a service as well as killing it once it’s been released. If Google’s long term strategy is a world without files as they say in the article, then I applaud their determination to make that happen. Wasting energy on an intermediate distraction seems silly

  • http://www.teare.com Keith Teare

    Buying Skype would have been a huge Plus for the G. Shame Sergei fell for the sabotage by the NIH guy.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah good job Google killed GDrive as products like Dropbox prove that there’s no need whatsoever for users to store their files in the cloud (I’m being sarcastic, of course).

  • http://twitter.com/spinchange spinchange

    SkyDrive – 25GB free – http://explore.live.com/window.....tos-videos

    Works with Windows Live Mesh on the desktop upto 5GB (as a free Dropbox replacement) http://explore.live.com/windows-live-mesh?os=other

    The only thing missing from this is an API!

    If MS got even a little “cross-platform religion,” they could really kick ass with Office365. (It doesn’t have the same ‘file’ size limitations that Docs does either: http://docs.google.com/support.....swer=37603)

    **I don’t work for, or have any vested interest in promoting MS stuff. I’ve researched it all in my lament for a “GDrive” solution and less restrictive Docs-type web app suite.

  • http://twitter.com/spinchange spinchange

    I doubt the expected resource requirements of a planned GDrive were why it was 86′d. The explanation here is very plausible – Pichai didn’t see synchronized file storage as an exciting enough problem to commit time and resources to going after. I respect the decision, but think we both agree it is a problem worth solving, however boring or many times it’s already been solved by others.

  • http://www.ratdiary.com spragued

    Amid all the apologetic theorizing people seem to be missing a possibility: Pichai screwed up. Given that he’s also the guy who thinks ChromeOS has a future, that’s where my money goes.

  • http://twitter.com/SkeptiMel Melody Jane

    Files are so 90′s? Get these boys a historian. As long as people want to make things, they will want to keep track of them in a way that they can store and access. It’s as simple as the human ego. People love to keep track of things; proof of what they’ve done, evidence of what happened, medical records, and access to it all.

    Google is going to be way behind if they start cutting out projects because their older and wiser competitors are going to get it and work out the kinks and their going to have to start all over from scratch again on a project they scrapped a year’s worth of work on.

    Bad ideas have nothing on hubris when it comes to sinking a ship.

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

So there’s no such thing as work-life balance. There’s work, and there’s life, and there’s no balance.

— Sheryl Sandberg, in an interview for the PBS/AOL digital and broadcast series “Makers: Women Who Make America”