Kara Swisher

Recent Posts by Kara Swisher

A “Probe in Your Pocket”? Apple’s Steve Jobs and Google’s Andy Rubin Talk Smartphone Privacy at D8 and Dive.

We’ve done a lot of onstage interviews at our D: All Things Digital conferences with the leaders of tech.

That includes Apple CEO Steve Jobs and Google smartphone kingpin Andy Rubin, both of whom are now dealing with the fallout over a series of reports that iOS and Android smartphones regularly transmit their locations back to both companies.

The privacy implications are obvious.

As Mobilized’s Ina Fried wrote last week:

Questions about what location-based information Android makes use of followed reports that Apple’s iPhone and 3G-equipped iPads are storing a history of location information in an unencrypted database on the device. The Wall Street Journal on Thursday noted that both Android and Apple devices are sending certain location information back to the companies.

In addition to that issue, there are separate issues over the length of time such information is stored, both on the device and by Apple and Google. The iPhone (and 3G-equipped iPads) appear to be storing a long-term directory of where a device has been and keeping that information in an unencrypted database. Google keeps a small cache of such information, to allow mapping and search to work even if a device temporarily loses GPS signal. However, it doesn’t keep a long-term record on the device.

That’s why we cut this video of Jobs and Rubin talking about privacy, specifically and respectively at the eighth D: All Things Digital last summer and at D: Dive Into Mobile in December.

“We take privacy extremely seriously,” said Jobs, who addressed the smartphone location data issue in particular. “A lot of people in [Silicon] Valley think we’re old-fashioned about this.”

And I pressed Rubin on Android being a “probe in your pocket,” and he said its mobile open source operating system did not collect data, although Google services did.

“I think this is a trust and verify,” Rubin noted.

Both Jobs and Rubin make some pretty strong privacy-related statements in these videos, so it will be interesting to see how it all shakes out:


comments so far. Add yours.

  • David

    I think Google is being unfairly dragged into this whole debate.

    The outrage about the iPhone is mainly because it’s local cache is unlimited and is easily accessible, the cache file on Android is properly truncated to the most recent session and one needs root access to read it.

    As to why an on-device location cache is even needed it’s because it considerably speeds up location lookup when using the phones’ location capabilities.

    And as for sending the data back, it’s very important to note that this is cell tower and WiFi hot-spot triangulation data, and it is sent anonymously, and used to refine and improve the accuracy of the devices’ location capabilities and so the benefit to the users is obvious.

    Now Google offers proper notice and control for these features, Apple does not, they should address that with an update and people should just chill out

  • http://twitter.com/zk0sn1 T S

    So many things…. Does Google need to put their opt-in request to send anonymous location data to them in brighter flashy blogger-approved lights? (Every Android phone owner must answer this question when they setup their Google account during initial configuration.) I would think the plain-English would be enough to satisfy the privacy issue.

    Google hasn’t hidden anything and have made additional statements this week. (Where is Apple’s statement?) What fallout exactly are you referring to on the Android side that isn’t blogger created?

    Oh right, must impugn Android as well if Apple screws up. I forgot.

    I believe the facts are that Android stores 50 cell tower locations maximum in a rolling record (which isn’t a lot considering the saturation of towers), while the iphone stores an infinite number. I have a nice 1150 tower record of my 2.5 week Australian vacation from the iphone I borrowed for my trip. I do appreciate the gift Apple gave me, but it was quite the surprise.

    Please separate the philosophical privacy questions from the permission and notification questions.

  • Anonymous

    Actually the iPhone’s data is not easy to find – unless you use the app, but then you’re not finding the file. It’s actually buried quite deep.

    And we don’t know yet what information is being transmitted back. I suspect it won’t be long until we know the details. Best thing to do for either Android or iOS is to take the hair-on-fire hysteria for what it is. Bloggers looking for hits, lawyers seeing fat lawsuits from deep pockets, and haters of all stripes licking their chops.

    And let’s be clear, Apple also asks for opt-in for location data. In fact, it happens so often I sometimes am annoyed by having to say yes once again for the same app.

    That doesn’t excuse what might be happening behind the scenes. But it’s not the end of the world. I’d be more concerned about the Supreme Court case from Vermont where drug companies might get the big nine to make harvesting personally identifiable information on our medical records a First Amendment right for drug manufacturers. THAT’s something everybody ought to worry about. This is an annoyance at this point.

  • David

    I think education on the subject should help in calming people and shield them form this sensationalism.

    A video explaining what is the nature of the data being collected and why it’s needed could help immensely.

  • Anonymous

    Apple, offers proper notice and control as well. The problem is no one understands what they are being notified about and to a certain degree don’t care as long as the Google Maps, Four Square, Yelp, and other such apps function as promised.

    The only thing I hope to come out of this is how ALL cell phones AND carriers track (not just update a database which only shows the latest info for a given set of parameters, not each and every time you have been someplace) and log everyone’s where abouts. Google, Apple, and the other smart phone makers are probably the least offenders in the industry and then only because the users want the apps that use that function.

    Joe

  • Anonymous

    The iPhone’s data goes nowhere. Android’s data goes back to Google. Big difference.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=521457199 Robert Goldberg

    That is NOT what privacy means, Mr. Jobs. Privacy means that you’re not invading my space. By you, I mean: banks, phone companies, duly authorized law enforcement without a warrant, charitable organizations who are kind enough not to sell my info after I’ve given them my money. Privacy is NOT the same as “knowing what you sign up for.” If I use a smartphone (like my iPhone) i have no choice to negotiate your TOS, and they’re overreaching. Android is even worse, transmitting the info to Google. Privacy policies inevitable mean, “here’s why you don’t have any.” There is little respect in corporate America (and Apple has become as corporate as they get) for privacy. Your smooth redefinition does nothing for me.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=521457199 Robert Goldberg

    Proper notice, yes. Control, no, other than simply not using an iPhone. In my opinion, overreaching TOS have been around for a long time, primarily in software licensing “agreements.” (Quotes because normally an agreement signifies a meeting of the minds, a negotiated, mutual position). Privacy has been under assault in the US and, I’m told, the UK for quite some time.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=521457199 Robert Goldberg

    Exactly. Apple stores the info onboard and in the synced computer. Google sends it home “several times an hour.” Why stash it any longer? Android/Google’s invasion of privacy is far more gloves off than Apple’s, though both are redolent of US Corporations’ disregard for privacy rights.

  • Anonymous

    Just curious. Are you just as outraged by all the web tracking that goes on, too? How they know not only where you’ve been and who you are, virtually, but also where you are physically?

    Joe

D8 Conference

Conversations with the most influential figures in media and technology.
June 1-3, 2010
Rancho Palos Verdes, California

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

D Conference Mailing List

Sign up for News about D Conferences

They have moved to the carcass phase of the business. That is a very bad sign. That is very interesting for lawyers and vulture funds. But to expect those companies to turn around technologically is all but impossible.

— Stephen Diamond, an associate professor of law at Santa Clara University, talking about HP, RIM and Yahoo