Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Why Fortune's Apple Story is AWOL from the Web–And Why You Can Buy It on Amazon

Last week, Fortune published a deep dive into Apple, then made sure that many people who would care about it couldn’t read it: The story was available in the magazine’s print and iPad editions, but not on the Web.

Instead, tech bloggers quickly devoured the piece and spat it back up, in chunks, on their own sites. And even if they were inclined to, they couldn’t point their readers to the source material.

What were Fortune’s managers thinking about? Quite a bit.

“This is an entirely new experiment,” says Dan Roth, managing editor of Fortune Digital. “We’re trying to figure out the best way of releasing journalism online.”

The short version: Fortune will eventually make the story available, for free, on the Web. But first it’s going to see if it can use Adam Lashinsky’s piece to generate more than just eyeballs. Perhaps even cash.

In the past, Fortune would have published the Apple story online last Thursday, at the same time the magazine was showing up on newsstands and in mailboxes.

Instead, the magazine teased the piece with a post from Fortune.com Apple blogger Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Saturday, telling print subscribers they could read the full story on Fortune’s iPad app for free. And that everyone else could either sign up for a $20 subscription–which would give them access to the app–or buy an individual iPad edition for $4.99.

Fortune hasn’t been able to pull this off until this week. It’s the first time the magazine has been able to offer its iPad app to print subscribers for free, via a pact that parent company Time Inc. just struck with Apple.

Roth says the main idea behind gating the story on the iPad app is to give print subscribers a bonus for their patronage. Or to make them feel like they weren’t dummies.

“There was this feeling that we’re sort of pissing off our subscribers,” by publishing the magazine’s best stories on the Web, often before paying customers got their hands on them, he says. “The problem was there wasn’t anything we could have offered them before.”

And if Fortune can sell some subscriptions or app downloads, even better. Over the weekend, Fortune tracked 1,400 referral visits to its subscription page from Elmer-DeWitt’s post, and another 1,000 visits to the app’s iTunes preview page. Roth says he hasn’t seen iTunes sales numbers yet.

Starting this morning, a small slice of the Apple piece will show up on Fortune.com, but that will be another teaser promoting the iPad app. If you really want to read the story and don’t want to wait–or shell out for an issue or a subscription–you’ll have another option, too: It’s now available as a $0.99 Kindle “single” on Amazon, too.

But won’t anyone who wants to read the story be able to read it for free via the tech blogs?

Well, yes. Maybe. That’s sort of the test.

Magazine employees have reached out to handful of bloggers who they think have lifted too much of Lashinsky’s story. They’re particularly sensitive about reproductions of a painstakingly created Apple org chart. (Sorry! Fixed!)

But Roth, along with Fortune managing editor Andy Serwer, assumed that parts of the story would get prominent Web play. Their bet is that most of Fortune’s audience will be interested in reading a really good Apple story, but not enough to seek out a summarized version on someone else’s site.

“I think that our readers, for the most part, aren’t necessarily going to Techmeme and reading the tech blogs”, Roth says.”A lot of them are. But not most of them. And this is the kind of thing that people will really want to read all of, and pass it along to friends.”

But then again, they’re not really sure. Hence the experiment. “None of us have any idea what works and what doesn’t work anymore.”

——-

Disclosure: I worked with Dan for a few months way back in the late 1990s, and he interviewed me when he wrote about my last employer a couple years ago. It’s a good read.


comments so far. Add yours.

  • http://indtechie.com Sidharth Dassani

    Hey Peter, Amazon single is now priced at $2.99 up from your mentioned price. I am in India. Maybe you see a lower price. Just check and update

  • Anonymous

    Oh wow, really makes you wonder what up with that. Wow.

    http://www.totally-anon.at.tc

  • http://www.digitalcents.net dagamer34

    This is like saying people are going to be so excited to pay $30 for a movie on DirecTV before it’s released to DVD and Blu-ray. If a person is willing to wait, no amount of delay is going to get them to spend money.

  • Canucker

    The calculation is that some people will not be willing to wait and will pay the premium. The downside is that the story doesn’t get seen by as many eyeballs and people lose interest. It’s an experiment in value propositions as the media companies try to feel their way to replacing revenue streams for magazines. The Huffington Post model is not for everyone (especially the content bloggers).

  • http://purfikt.wordpress.com Aaron Brown

    I’d love to purchase the Amazon Single but it says that it won’t be available until tomorrow. What gives? It will only let me pre-order it.

  • http://profiles.google.com/gspira Greg Spira

    So subscribers who don’t have an ipad can’t read the article until the issue arrives in the mail? Ridiculous.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Nope. Still $0.99 via their U.S. site. Send link if you get a chance…

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Correct. And really, it’s not even about waiting — you can get anything digital you want, pretty much any time you want, for free, if you’re willing to do some amount of work. No paywall or any other model will prevent that. This model and every other commerce model is trying to figure out what price potential *buyers* will shell out for convenience.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    One more day, apparently.

  • Anonymous

    I’m not paying to read about this story, but for 20 seconds after reading a snippet on MacRumors, I considered paying for the App to get the story. If Fortune or media company ‘x’ keep doing it, then I will probably pay up.

  • Anonymous

    Does anyone else find it rather coincidental that this story is an exclusive deep dive on Apple, that’s exclusively available on the Apple iPad, that’s exclusively published after the magazine’s parent company inks a deal with…wait for it…Apple?

    C’mon guys, church and state!!

    Fortune should have kicked off this experiment with a story about anyone but Apple.

  • http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/ PKafka

    Silly. It’s “exclusive” because Fortune was the only company that did the reporting, not because Apple cooperated with them. And Time Inc. has a not-great relationship with Apple — you may have noticed that they’re the only big magazine publisher that hasn’t announced a subscription deal. And oh nevermind. You’re not going to read this anyway.

  • http://twitter.com/ShawnKing Shawn King


    It’s now available as a $0.99 Kindle “single” on Amazon…” Not quite.

    While Amazon said it would be available today, the web site now says, “This title will be auto-delivered to your Kindle on May 12, 2011.”

Google’s Cable TV Lineup: A Wishlist

February 22, 2012 at 3:29 pm PT

Hello, Goodbye. That Will Be $1.29.

February 22, 2012 at 6:30 am PT

Resonate Raises $22 Million for “Values” Ads

February 22, 2012 at 4:00 am PT

Sponsored Topic

Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

Knowledge for my generation was at the center of the human quest. It is going the way of the recording industry. It is a term that won’t survive the generation.

— David Weinberger, researcher at Harvard’s Berkman Center for the Internet and Society, from a lecture last Wednesday at the University of California at Berkeley’s School of Information