High Court Backs Privacy Rights in GPS Case

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that police must obtain a warrant before attaching a GPS tracker to a suspect’s vehicle, voting unanimously in one of the first major cases to test constitutional privacy rights in the digital age.

The government argued that attaching the tiny device to a car’s undercarriage was too trivial a violation of property rights to matter, and that no one who drove in public streets could expect his movements to go unmonitored. Thus, the technique was “reasonable,” meaning that police were free to employ it for any reason without first justifying it to a magistrate, the government said.

Read the rest of this post on the original site ยป


Must-Reads from other Web sites

Megan Miller

Myspace and Urban Renewal

Om Malik and Stacey Higginbotham

Having Problems With Your Netflix? You Can Blame Verizon.

Tony Haile

If the Pageview Is Dead, Now What?

Alistair Barr

From the Ashes of Webvan, Amazon Builds a Grocery Business

Graeme Wood

Scrubbed

About Voices

Along with original content and posts from across the Dow Jones network, this section of AllThingsD includes Must-Reads From Other Web Sites — pieces we’ve read, discussions we’ve followed, stuff we like. Six posts from external sites are included here each weekday, but we only run the headlines. We link to the original sites for the rest. These posts are explicitly labeled, so it’s clear that the content comes from other Web sites, and for clarity’s sake, all outside posts run against a pink background.

We also solicit original full-length posts and accept some unsolicited submissions.

Voices is edited by Beth Callaghan.

Partner Advertisement

VentureBeat