Day One of Apple vs. Samsung: Jury Selection and Another Debate Over Apple’s “Sony Style”
The trial of Apple versus Samsung kicked off with another debate on whether Samsung should be allowed to present evidence on whether Sony influenced the design of the original iPhone.
The judge on Sunday said that Samsung would not be able to present the “Sony Style” issue as part of its opening argument. Monday’s debate was to whether Samsung would be allowed to introduce testimony from Shin Nishibori, the former Apple designer who created a Sony-inspired take on the iPhone.
Judge Lucy Koh said she was trying to understand how, if at all, Nishibori’s testimony could be allowed without introducing previously excluded evidence. Samsung’s lawyers argued that Nishibori’s testimony could rebut Apple’s argument that Samsung is “slavishly copying” Apple.
“Just like we look to competitors to get inspired, so does Apple,” said Samsung’s lawyer Charles Verhoeven.
Of course, getting Nishibori in court could also prove thorny. A lawyer representing the former designer filed a letter with the court on Sunday, saying that Nishibori would not appear, and is in Hawaii recovering from various medical issues.
In a Motion For Reconsideration also filed today, Samsung argued that disallowing the “Sony style” argument will compromise the trial. “The Court’s Order striking numerous demonstrative exhibits from Samsung’s proposed opening statement for the jury trial set to begin today threatens the fundamental fairness of this trial and will compromise the integrity of any verdict,” the company said.
The arguments came just ahead of jury selection in the case, which is set to begin shortly.
Update, 9:55 a.m.: The prospective jurors have just been brought into the courtroom as the process of jury selection begins.
10:40 a.m.: Jurors are being probed for potential conflicts. It’s clear this trial is taking place in heart of Silicon Valley. Several of them have ties to Apple or Google including stock owners, former consultants, etc.
Asked whether they had read books about Apple or Google, one potential juror held up his hand and said he had read an article in the Wall Street Journal article today, holding up the newspaper.
“I’m going to ask you if you wouldn’t mind recycling that,” Judge Koh told the juror.
Potential jurors are now being asked what phone they have, who makes it and whether they are considering buying any Samsung or Apple products in the near future. This is going to take a while.
11:06: After an enlightening look at the tech habits of San Jose shoppers, would-be jurors now being asked if they have read anything about the case. Lots of hands have gone up. All but one juror say that what they have read would not keep them from being fair and impartial.
11:25: As part of quizzing potential jurors about whether the trial would be a financial hardship, Judge Koh says evidence portion of Apple vs. Samsung trial should run through at least Aug. 17 and possibly through Aug. 20 or Aug. 21.
1:10 p.m.: Just back after a short lunch break. It’s looking more likely the opening arguments won’t happen until Tuesday as everyone has agreed both openings should take place on the same day. Plus, there’s still a bunch more questioning of the prospective jurors still to go.
A few jurors who said they could not be impartial for one reason or another were excused just before lunch. More detailed questioning of those that remain is slated to start shortly.
1:45 p.m.: Much of the questioning this afternoon centers around prospective jurors experience with technology and patents.
In another sign this trial is taking place in Silicon Valley, four of the remaining potential jurors have had patents issued to them, including one who is named in more than 125 patents.
Jurors are also being asked how often they blog or post to social media: Facebook, Twitter, even MySpace.
2:45 p.m.: After several hours of questioning by the judge, the lawyers are now getting their first chance to ask questions. Each side has 20 minutes to quiz the remaining prospective jurors. Apple’s lawyer has gotten his time, Samsung gets their time after a brief bio break.
3:15 p.m. Samsung lawyer is quizzing potential jurors individually. He asks a woman who has a pair of patents to her credit and works in technology why it is she has a basic phone, rather than a smartphone.
She responded that she doesn’t like the fact you need a pricey data plan.
“I use the phone to call people,” she said. “For the data, well I am on the computer all the time.”
The lawyer then turned his attention to a woman who said earlier she is contemplating an iPad purchase, asking why that is.
“I love the technology,” she said. “You can just sit around in the yard and play with it.”
“You know other companies make tablets,” he responded
“Apple comes out with really, really nice stuff,” she said.
Well, you asked…
3:35 p.m.: Apple renewed its effort to have excused for cause a Google employee who has patents related to Android. Koh rejected the motion, saying that the juror has answered all questions credibly and said he can keep an open mind despite his employment and ownership of Google stock options.
Each side will now get to strike four of the remaining jurors without giving a reason.
4:00 p.m.: Jury of 10 picked. Google employee not among the final jurors.
4:02 p.m.: The chosen 10 getting their preliminary instructions. Opening arguments for both sides will take place tomorrow morning. Each will get about an hour and a half.
4:35 p.m.: Jury done for the day, due back at 9 a.m. to see a video about patents, then hear opening arguments.
- Calling All Gluttons for Legalese Punishment: Here’s the Apple-Samsung Amended Verdict Form
- Apple-Samsung Juror Tells CNET Debate Was “Heated”
- “The Jury Has Now Spoken”: Apple CEO Tim Cook’s Memo to Employees on Patent Win Over Samsung
- Apple’s Big Patent Win: A Shot Across the Bow of All Android Device Manufacturers
- Next Stop for Apple-Samsung: Appeals Court
- Wall Street Reacts to Apple’s Legal Win Over Samsung: Maybe, Let’s Not Kill All the Lawyers!
- Apple Says Verdict Is a Win for Values; Samsung Says It’s a Loss for Consumers
- Jury Slightly Lowers Apple-Samsung Verdict After Inconsistencies Noted
- On One-Year of Anniversary of Jobs Stepping Down as CEO, Karma’s a … Patent Victory for Apple
- Jury: Samsung Owes Apple More Than $1 Billion for Infringing Patents
- Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial
- Ringside as Apple and Samsung Go Into the Final Round
- Apple, Samsung Jury Won’t Hear About Missing Evidence
- The Definitive Insider’s Guide to Apple vs. Samsung
- At Long Last, Testimony Wraps up in Apple Vs. Samsung
- Apple: Samsung Didn’t Live Up to Its Standards Obligations
- Judge Koh: It’s Samsung’s Own Fault It Ran Out of Time
- Apple Lawyer to Frustrated Judge: Yes, We Need All These Witnesses, and No, I’m Not Smoking Crack
- Apple vs. Samsung Judge Encourages “Horse Trading” to Narrow Case
- Apple Says Samsung Documents Show Google’s Influence On Galaxy Products
- Patience Runs Thin as Time Runs Short in Apple vs. Samsung
- Samsung Designer Says Galaxy Tab 10.1 Work Preceded iPad Announcement
- Give Peace a Chance, Judge Says, Asking Apple and Samsung CEOs to Meet One Last Time
- Samsung Document Notes Their Smartphone Icons Not Always Iconic
- Samsung Designer Testifies She Didn’t Copy Any of Apple’s Icons
- Fireworks in Apple-Samsung Trial Over Whether Expert Had Improper Access to Intel Source Code
- The iPhone Advantage Is Largest in Big Cities, According to Samsung Study
- Judge Refuses to Toss Most of Apple’s Suit Against Samsung
- Apple: Offer to License Patents to Samsung Didn’t Include iPhone’s Interface
- Latest Front in the Apple vs. Samsung Battle: Jury Instructions
- A Look Back at the Second Week of the Apple-Samsung Trial
- Here’s Apple’s August 2010 Warning to Samsung on Patents
- Apple Offered to License its Patents to Samsung for $30 Per Smartphone, $40 Per Tablet
- Apple Patent Head: We Don’t Want to License Clones
- MIT Professor Says Samsung Customers Might Pay Extra $100 for Apple-like Features
- After Starting With a Bang, Apple vs. Samsung Now Just as Boring as Other Patent Cases
- Samsung’s U.S. Tablet Revenue Less Than 5 Percent of Apple’s, Court Documents Show
- Apple vs. Samsung Trial Forces Companies to Open Up the Books
- Jurors in Apple vs. Samsung Get a Raise, but Still Woefully Underpaid
- Samsung on Its iPhone-Envy Memo: Nothing to See Here, Move Along
- Samsung’s 2010 Report Says Its Galaxy Would Be Better if It Were Just More Like the iPhone
- Similarity of Apple and Samsung Icons “Beyond Coincidental,” Designer Testifies
- iPhone Caused “Crisis of Design” at Samsung (Memo)
- Samsung Exec Downplays “Crisis of Design” Memo at Patent Trial
- Five Things We Learned at the Apple-Samsung Trial Last Week
- Samsung’ Hinges its Case on Rectangles and Rounded Corners
- Apple’s Case Against Samsung in Three Pictures
- Top Apple Executive Saw Market for 7-Inch Tablet in 2011, Said Company Should Do One
- Apple’s Scott Forstall on How “Project Purple” Became the iPhone
- Apple’s Phil Schiller on How Apple Came Up With the iPhone and iPad
- Apple Loses Bid to Keep Customer Survey Secret
- Samsung and Apple Speaking to One Jury, Many Audiences
- Samsung: We Weren’t Trying to Mess With the Jury
- Judge Koh on “2001” Evidence: I’m Sorry, Samsung, I’m Afraid I Can’t Do That
- Apple: Litigation Misconduct Is Part of Samsung’s Legal Strategy
- Samsung Goes Public With Excluded Evidence to Undercut Apple’s Design Claims
- Apple Designer: We’ve Been Ripped Off
- Apple Designer: Even Steve Jobs Doubted the iPhone at Times
- Apple Literally Designs Its Products Around a Kitchen Table
- Samsung: Apple Didn’t Invent the Rectangle
- Apple: Samsung Took the Easy Road and Copied Us
- Day One of Apple vs. Samsung Starts With Another Debate on Apple’s “Sony Style”
- Samsung Thwarted in Bid to Show Apple Has “Sony Style”
- As Apple and Samsung Head to Court, Here’s a Handy Cheat Sheet
- Key Witness No Longer Works at Apple, Doesn’t Want to Testify at Samsung Trial
- Can I Get a Witness? Sure, Here’s a Whole List of Them, as Apple vs. Samsung Heads to Trial.
- Apple’s Case Against Samsung Gives Rare Glimpse at Dozens of iPhone and iPad Prototype Designs
- Samsung Makes Another Case to Have Apple’s “Sony Style” Put Before Jury
- Apple Tries to Torpedo Samsung’s “Sony Style” iPhone Charge
- Samsung, Apple Even at Odds Over Where They Will Sit at Trial
- Documents in Apple vs. Samsung Give Reporters Plenty to Chew On
- Samsung, Apple Reveal Names of Those Who May Testify at Next Week’s Trial
- Apple’s iPhone Has Sony Style, Says Samsung (Full Trial Brief)
- Apple: Google Warned Samsung Against Copying Us
- Jury to Hear That Samsung Failed to Preserve Evidence in Apple Patent Suit
- Apple to Samsung: You Give Us $2.5 Billion and We’ll Give You a Half-Cent-a-Unit Royalty
- Apple vs. Samsung: Another Patent Slapfight, Another Exasperated Judge