Fireworks in Apple-Samsung Trial Over Whether Expert Had Improper Access to Intel Source Code
While the Apple-Samsung trial itself follows a fairly predictable and orderly flow, it’s often a surprise to see what issues the lawyers will bring up in the half hour before court starts.
On Tuesday, the issue at hand was whether a Samsung-hired expert, Tim Williams, was given access to Intel source code without fully disclosing his potential conflicts of interest.
Lawyers for Intel brought up the issue on Tuesday, saying that they had just learned that Williams had been given access to the code earlier this year. Under a court order, parties such as Intel are supposed to be given notice when their confidential information is shared.
Intel asked that Williams be precluded from testifying, something that from Judge Lucy Koh would be an extreme remedy at this point. However, Koh decided that she needed more details, declaring that Williams would not testify as scheduled on Tuesday, and ordering both sides to produce the relevant documents and their legal arguments.
“I want to see papers,” Koh said. “I don’t trust what any lawyer in this courtroom tells me.”
With that, the jury was brought in to hear testimony. The first new witness of the day was Clifton Forlines, a former Mitsubishi Electric Research Lab employee, who is testifying about the DiamondTouch system.
Forlines began offering up answers in rapid-fire succession, before being asked to slow down. The clearly nervous Forlines noted that it was his first time in court.
His testimony is being used to bolster Samsung’s contention that the DiamondTouch and its accompanying software represents “prior art” that should render some of Apple’s patents invalid. Samsung began laying the groundwork for this on Monday, with the testimony of another former Mitsubishi employee.
After just a few minutes, Forlines was done.
Update 9:40 am PT: After some legal wrangling away from the jury, Samsung was allowed to call expert Woodward Yang, a Harvard computer science professor, to testify whether Apple is violating Samsung’s patents.
Yang is explaining the three patents that Samsung has accused Apple of infringing. The first covers having a separate method for handling plain-text emails and those with a photo. A second patent covers being able to send a photo and return to the same place in the photo album. The third patent that Samsung alleges Apple has infringed covers a means for playing music in the background on a phone.
10:24 a.m.: Yang has methodically outlined how he believes Apple’s iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad infringe on the various patents (though not all versions of all products for all three patents).
The biggest excitement is that some of the music being demoed is from Bruce Springsteen. Also, Apple’s lawyers are ready to pounce if Yang goes into some of the testimony the judge has excluded.
10:54 a.m.: Asked by the judge the status on the Intel matter, Intel’s lawyer said that the company would seek sanctions and a contempt finding against Samsung but is no longer looking to keep him off the witness stand.
“I was never going to grant that,” Koh said. “That was (an) extreme and unwarranted sanction.”
Meanwhile, back in the trial, Samsung’s lawyers have finished their questioning of Yang, with Apple lawyer Bill Lee now starting his cross-examination. Lee starts by getting Yang to agree that he never talked to any of the Samsung inventors even though they were in town recently.
Apple’s lawyer is getting to mention, despite Samsung’s objections, the fact that certain Samsung executives aren’t being called in the case. Lee is noting that Yang is the only one testifying regarding the Samsung patents that Apple is accused of infringing.
Lee also showing that Samsung isn’t using two of the patents at issue in its own recent products.
11:35 a.m.: Lee still hammering away at Yang. Current focus is on whether Apple’s products follow the specific steps outlined in the ’460 patent. That’s the one that covers separate email modes for standard email and those with photos.
11:52 a.m.: Apple wraps its questioning of Yang just ahead of the noon lunch break, with Samsung now asking a few on re-direction.
1:11 p.m.: We’re back from lunch, but the jury is still away while the attorneys hash out what Samsung’s next witness Jeeyuen Wang can and cannot testify about.
1:24 p.m.: Legal matters finally settled, Wang is now on the stand. Wang is a user experience designer for Samsung Electronics and is testifying in Korean via an interpreter.
Asked whether, in designing icons for the Galaxy products she copied any of Apple’s icons.
“Not at all,” she said.
And, if you just cant get enough Apple v. Samsung, here’s a video interview I did with the Wall Street Journal’s Digits show this morning:
- Calling All Gluttons for Legalese Punishment: Here’s the Apple-Samsung Amended Verdict Form
- Apple-Samsung Juror Tells CNET Debate Was “Heated”
- “The Jury Has Now Spoken”: Apple CEO Tim Cook’s Memo to Employees on Patent Win Over Samsung
- Apple’s Big Patent Win: A Shot Across the Bow of All Android Device Manufacturers
- Next Stop for Apple-Samsung: Appeals Court
- Wall Street Reacts to Apple’s Legal Win Over Samsung: Maybe, Let’s Not Kill All the Lawyers!
- Apple Says Verdict Is a Win for Values; Samsung Says It’s a Loss for Consumers
- Jury Slightly Lowers Apple-Samsung Verdict After Inconsistencies Noted
- On One-Year of Anniversary of Jobs Stepping Down as CEO, Karma’s a … Patent Victory for Apple
- Jury: Samsung Owes Apple More Than $1 Billion for Infringing Patents
- Competing Views of Competition in Apple-Samsung Trial
- Ringside as Apple and Samsung Go Into the Final Round
- Apple, Samsung Jury Won’t Hear About Missing Evidence
- The Definitive Insider’s Guide to Apple vs. Samsung
- At Long Last, Testimony Wraps up in Apple Vs. Samsung
- Apple: Samsung Didn’t Live Up to Its Standards Obligations
- Judge Koh: It’s Samsung’s Own Fault It Ran Out of Time
- Apple Lawyer to Frustrated Judge: Yes, We Need All These Witnesses, and No, I’m Not Smoking Crack
- Apple vs. Samsung Judge Encourages “Horse Trading” to Narrow Case
- Apple Says Samsung Documents Show Google’s Influence On Galaxy Products
- Patience Runs Thin as Time Runs Short in Apple vs. Samsung
- Samsung Designer Says Galaxy Tab 10.1 Work Preceded iPad Announcement
- Give Peace a Chance, Judge Says, Asking Apple and Samsung CEOs to Meet One Last Time
- Samsung Document Notes Their Smartphone Icons Not Always Iconic
- Samsung Designer Testifies She Didn’t Copy Any of Apple’s Icons
- Fireworks in Apple-Samsung Trial Over Whether Expert Had Improper Access to Intel Source Code
- The iPhone Advantage Is Largest in Big Cities, According to Samsung Study
- Judge Refuses to Toss Most of Apple’s Suit Against Samsung
- Apple: Offer to License Patents to Samsung Didn’t Include iPhone’s Interface
- Latest Front in the Apple vs. Samsung Battle: Jury Instructions
- A Look Back at the Second Week of the Apple-Samsung Trial
- Here’s Apple’s August 2010 Warning to Samsung on Patents
- Apple Offered to License its Patents to Samsung for $30 Per Smartphone, $40 Per Tablet
- Apple Patent Head: We Don’t Want to License Clones
- MIT Professor Says Samsung Customers Might Pay Extra $100 for Apple-like Features
- After Starting With a Bang, Apple vs. Samsung Now Just as Boring as Other Patent Cases
- Samsung’s U.S. Tablet Revenue Less Than 5 Percent of Apple’s, Court Documents Show
- Apple vs. Samsung Trial Forces Companies to Open Up the Books
- Jurors in Apple vs. Samsung Get a Raise, but Still Woefully Underpaid
- Samsung on Its iPhone-Envy Memo: Nothing to See Here, Move Along
- Samsung’s 2010 Report Says Its Galaxy Would Be Better if It Were Just More Like the iPhone
- Similarity of Apple and Samsung Icons “Beyond Coincidental,” Designer Testifies
- iPhone Caused “Crisis of Design” at Samsung (Memo)
- Samsung Exec Downplays “Crisis of Design” Memo at Patent Trial
- Five Things We Learned at the Apple-Samsung Trial Last Week
- Samsung’ Hinges its Case on Rectangles and Rounded Corners
- Apple’s Case Against Samsung in Three Pictures
- Top Apple Executive Saw Market for 7-Inch Tablet in 2011, Said Company Should Do One
- Apple’s Scott Forstall on How “Project Purple” Became the iPhone
- Apple’s Phil Schiller on How Apple Came Up With the iPhone and iPad
- Apple Loses Bid to Keep Customer Survey Secret
- Samsung and Apple Speaking to One Jury, Many Audiences
- Samsung: We Weren’t Trying to Mess With the Jury
- Judge Koh on “2001” Evidence: I’m Sorry, Samsung, I’m Afraid I Can’t Do That
- Apple: Litigation Misconduct Is Part of Samsung’s Legal Strategy
- Samsung Goes Public With Excluded Evidence to Undercut Apple’s Design Claims
- Apple Designer: We’ve Been Ripped Off
- Apple Designer: Even Steve Jobs Doubted the iPhone at Times
- Apple Literally Designs Its Products Around a Kitchen Table
- Samsung: Apple Didn’t Invent the Rectangle
- Apple: Samsung Took the Easy Road and Copied Us
- Day One of Apple vs. Samsung Starts With Another Debate on Apple’s “Sony Style”
- Samsung Thwarted in Bid to Show Apple Has “Sony Style”
- As Apple and Samsung Head to Court, Here’s a Handy Cheat Sheet
- Key Witness No Longer Works at Apple, Doesn’t Want to Testify at Samsung Trial
- Can I Get a Witness? Sure, Here’s a Whole List of Them, as Apple vs. Samsung Heads to Trial.
- Apple’s Case Against Samsung Gives Rare Glimpse at Dozens of iPhone and iPad Prototype Designs
- Samsung Makes Another Case to Have Apple’s “Sony Style” Put Before Jury
- Apple Tries to Torpedo Samsung’s “Sony Style” iPhone Charge
- Samsung, Apple Even at Odds Over Where They Will Sit at Trial
- Documents in Apple vs. Samsung Give Reporters Plenty to Chew On
- Samsung, Apple Reveal Names of Those Who May Testify at Next Week’s Trial
- Apple’s iPhone Has Sony Style, Says Samsung (Full Trial Brief)
- Apple: Google Warned Samsung Against Copying Us
- Jury to Hear That Samsung Failed to Preserve Evidence in Apple Patent Suit
- Apple to Samsung: You Give Us $2.5 Billion and We’ll Give You a Half-Cent-a-Unit Royalty
- Apple vs. Samsung: Another Patent Slapfight, Another Exasperated Judge