Peter Kafka

Recent Posts by Peter Kafka

Indeed.com Was a Huge Win for the New York Times. But Not as Big as Its Ad Problem.

In 2005, concerned that its lucrative help-wanted ads business was being destroyed by the Internet, the New York Times placed a hedge: It put less than $5 million into Indeed.com, an online jobs service.

Seven years later, that turned out to be a lottery ticket. Japan’s Recruit Co. is buying Indeed for something like $1 billion, and the Times ended up netting more than $100 million on its investment. That’s a huge return — the kind that venture capitalists pray for, and that big media companies almost never get.

That’s the good news.

The bad news is that even that return won’t plug the hole left by the Times’ vaporized jobs ads.

In 2005, the Times was generating $189 million from help-wanted classifieds. By last year, that business had shrunk to $34 million.

Nearly every newspaper in the U.S. has a similar story to tell — Google, eBay, Craigslist and the rest of the Web destroyed the high-margin classifieds business. But sometimes it’s a good reminder to see it in chart form anyway:

(Data: Company reports.)


Latest Video

View all videos »

Search »

The problem with the Billionaire Savior phase of the newspaper collapse has always been that billionaires don’t tend to like the kind of authority-questioning journalism that upsets the status quo.

— Ryan Chittum, writing in the Columbia Journalism Review about the promise of Pierre Omidyar’s new media venture with Glenn Greenwald