Judge Strikes Down Secretive Surveillance Law

A federal judge this week struck down a controversial set of laws allowing the Federal Bureau of Investigation to seek people’s data without a court’s approval, saying the strict secrecy orders demanded by the laws are not constitutional.

Judge Susan Illston, of U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, said the laws, which underlie a tool known as a “national security letter,” violate the First Amendment and the separation of powers principles. In her order, Judge Illston ordered the government to stop issuing national security letters or enforcing their gag orders, although she said enforcement of her judgment would be stayed pending appeal.

Read the rest of this post on the original site »


Must-Reads from other Web sites

Brad Stone

Inside Google’s Secret Lab

Dani Fankhauser

Elizabeth Spiers on Launching Media Brands

John Sudworth

Can China Become A Hi-Tech Economy?

George Packer

Change The World

About Voices

Along with original content and posts from across the Dow Jones network, this section of AllThingsD includes Must-Reads From Other Web Sites — pieces we’ve read, discussions we’ve followed, stuff we like. Six posts from external sites are included here each weekday, but we only run the headlines. We link to the original sites for the rest. These posts are explicitly labeled, so it’s clear that the content comes from other Web sites, and for clarity’s sake, all outside posts run against a pink background.

We also solicit original full-length posts and accept some unsolicited submissions.

Voices is edited by Beth Callaghan.