Google Doubles Down on Music Subscriptions, Which Means Google Isn’t Serious About Music Subscriptions
And, yes, Google still plans to launch a separate subscription music service later this year, via its YouTube site.
Make sense? Of course not.
It makes lots of sense for both YouTube and Play, which was built for Google’s Android devices, to sell music subscriptions.
YouTube is the world’s biggest free music service, which could make it a fantastic funnel for a Spotify-like paid offering, which can also help solve some problems with the music labels.
And if you’re going to have the world’s dominant mobile platform, then you ought to be the one selling music subscriptions that work on it, because that could help your customers stick to that platform. No sense in handing that feature over to Spotify, which works fine on iPhones and Kindles, too.
And something that knitted Android and YouTube together — combining a mix of free, paid, mobile, audio and video — could be great.
But that’s not what we’re going to see this week.
Music folks I talked to today expect the Google Play version to be paid-only — no free teaser tier, like Spotify has — and without any features that will set it apart from rivals.
And when YouTube launches its service — as best as I can tell, talks with the Big Three labels are all but completed — that service will likely run parallel to, but not connected with, the Play version. Which means none of the free music that people can get on YouTube will help sell Play subscriptions.
This set-up supposedly stems from former Android boss Andy Rubin’s insistence on controlling his own fiefdom (“Andy and [YouTube head] Salar Kamangar couldn’t be in the same room together,” said a music executive who has worked with both of them). But now we’re in the Sundar Pichai era, and he said he’s all about peace and love.
I’ve heard people in and outside of Google suggest that at some point down the line the two services could be knitted together. After all, just because something gets announced at Google I/O doesn’t mean it will show up. And getting something out there before it’s fully baked is standard operating procedure for Google.
But music subscriptions are an old idea that still really haven’t caught on in a big way. Spotify has six million paying customers worldwide, but its backers concede that it’s still a long way from mainstream. And none of its competitors are even close to those numbers.
If Google really wanted to make subscriptions work, instead of simply offering them as a feature most people won’t use — like the music store it opened up in 2011 — it ought to take the time to get this one right the first time.
- Shoot the Moon: How Google Turned a Hodgepodge of Upgrades Into a Show of Strength
- Google I/O: Music, Maps, Messaging and More
- Larry Page Takes the Pulpit to Praise Technology, Snipe at Competitors
- Next Google Maps Update to Include Better Venue Search, Waze-Like Rerouting
- Google Gives Search a Deeper Voice and Adds Reminders and More to Google Now
- With Revamped Hangouts, Google Aims to Unify Messaging
- Google+ Gets a Bit More Pinteresting
- Google Chrome: 750 Million Active Users, Synchronized Web and Mobile Browsing
- Coming Soon From Google: A $649 Samsung Galaxy S4 Running Stock Android
- With Sights Set on Spotify (And Pandora), Google Launches a Music Subscription Service
- Google on Android: 900 Million Activations, New Tools for Developers Coming
- Google Doubles Down on Music Subscriptions, Which Means Google Isn’t Serious About Music Subscriptions
- Where Are They Now? Google I/O 2012 Edition.
- At I/O, Google Tilts Toward Android Services Over Android OS
- Google Downplays Expectations Ahead of I/O Developer Conference
- Will Google Deliver on Its Nexus Q Promise? Not at This Year’s I/O.
- Ahead of I/O, Google Wallet Drops Plans to Introduce a Physical Card
- Google Goes With Unified I/O Keynote (But Will It Unify Its Products?)