Apple CEO Tim Cook: “The E-Book Case to Me Is Bizarre”
Apple today squares off against the U.S. Department of Justice in a Manhattan courtroom, defending itself against charges that it was the “ringmaster” of a cartel of publishers that conspired to raise prices in the e-book market. And, at first glance, the odds appear to be stacked against the company.
The DOJ claims to have clear evidence of collusion — incendiary email messages from Apple co-founder Steve Jobs and other company executives, and the like. The five publishers with which Apple allegedly schemed — HarperCollins, Hachette, Macmillan, Simon & Schuster and Penguin — have all since settled, leaving it as the lone company fighting the suit. The judge presiding over the trial, Denise Cote, said earlier this month that she doesn’t think it has much of a chance of winning. And legal experts are dubious about Apple’s chances.
As Pam Samuelson, director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology, told AllThingsD, “The DOJ would not be pursuing this case if they thought they would lose.”
But then neither would Apple.
Which is worth considering, because the company is clearly taking a “come heavy or not at all” approach to this case. To wit, CEO Tim Cook’s comments last week at our D11 conference.
“The e-book case to me is bizarre,” Cook said. “We’ve done nothing wrong there, and so we’re taking a very principled position. … We’re not going to sign something that says we did something we didn’t do. … So we’re going to fight.”
In other words, it’s Apple’s opinion that the government’s case against it is utter fantasy. And today the company and its legal team will set out to prove it, arguing that Apple acted lawfully when it entered the e-book market in 2010, and that its entrance transformed the market for the benefit of all.
Apple and the Department of Justice both declined comment on the case.
- Apple Doesn’t Want to Pay the Feds’ E-Book Lawyer $70,000 a Week
- Apple Files Expected Appeal of E-Book Injunction
- Apple’s E-Book Punishment Court Order is Final, and Not as Bad as Apple Feared
- The Incredible Shrinking Apple E-Book Remedy
- Apple Says DOJ’s E-Book Remedies Are Biased in Amazon’s Favor
- DOJ Softens Proposed Apple Ebook Injunctions, Slightly
- Apple Slams Feds’ Proposed E-Book Remedies as a “Draconian and Punitive Intrusion”
- Apple’s Chances for an E-Book Ruling Appeal Are Lousy, Say Legal Scholars
- Apple E-Books Ruling Won’t Do Much For Consumers
- Apple Loses E-Book Antitrust Trial
- Here’s Apple’s Closing Slide Deck in E-Book Case, and the DOJ’s, Too
- Apple: It’s Time to Close the Book on DOJ’s E-Book Case
- Steve Jobs, Winnie the Pooh and the iBook Launch
- The Apple iBooks Origin Story
- Apple’s Cue Says Publishers Pushed for Higher E-Book Prices
- DOJ Misfires on Jobs Email in Apple E-Book Case — It Was a Discarded Draft
- Is Steve Jobs Message a Smoking Gun in Apple E-Book Case?
- Amazon Demanded Same Terms From Publishers For Which Apple is Now On Trial
- Apple Says Differences in Publisher Deals Belie E-Book Conspiracy Charges
- Apple Accuses DOJ of Unfairly Twisting Steve Jobs’s Words
- Apple Says DOJ Is Trying to “Reverse Engineer a Conspiracy” in E-Books Case
- Here’s the DOJ’s E-Book-Pricing Case Against Apple (Slide Deck)
- Apple CEO Tim Cook: “The E-Book Case to Me Is Bizarre”
- Judge in E-Book Pricing Case Thinks Apple’s Going Down; Apple Begs to Differ
- Here’s That Steve Jobs E-Book Email to James Murdoch
- Apple’s E-Book Argument: Deals With Publishers Improved Competition
- DOJ Filing Calls Apple “Ringmaster” of E-Book Pricing Rise
- Apple Alone Fighting DOJ E-Book Suit After Macmillan Settlement
- Apple’s Cook Must Testify in E-Book Antitrust Suit