Apple Says DOJ Is Trying to “Reverse Engineer a Conspiracy” in E-Books Case
Evidently that’s the word Apple has settled on to describe the U.S. Department of Justice’s e-book price fixing case against it. CEO Tim Cook used it last week during his onstage interview at D11, and Apple attorney Orin Snyder rolled it out once again during opening arguments in the trial that will determine whether Apple and a coterie of five major U.S. publishers schemed to raise e-book prices throughout the industry.
Apple’s position is that it did no such thing. And in some withering opening remarks, Snyder aggressively made that argument. He decried the case as a “sinister inference” based on ambiguous evidence, lambasted the government for bringing it and raised concerns about remarks the presiding judge made last month suggesting she thought the Justice Department might prevail.
“When the U.S. government brings a case, many assume it must have merit,” Snyder said. “But even our government is fallible, and sometimes the government just gets it wrong. … Apple did not conspire with any publisher individually, collectively or otherwise to raise industry prices. … Apple is going to trial because it did nothing wrong. … Every single indicator of market health improved after Apple entered the e-book market.”
According to Snyder, the DOJ’s case is built on cherry-picked quotes and bits of documentation that aren’t really incriminating when put into the broader context of a new e-book market rife with pricing tension between publishers and Amazon. In a word, it’s “fiction.”
Said Snyder, “What the government is trying to do is reverse engineer a conspiracy from a market effect.”
PREVIOUSLY:
- Apple Doesn’t Want to Pay the Feds’ E-Book Lawyer $70,000 a Week
- Apple Files Expected Appeal of E-Book Injunction
- Apple’s E-Book Punishment Court Order is Final, and Not as Bad as Apple Feared
- The Incredible Shrinking Apple E-Book Remedy
- Apple Says DOJ’s E-Book Remedies Are Biased in Amazon’s Favor
- DOJ Softens Proposed Apple Ebook Injunctions, Slightly
- Apple Slams Feds’ Proposed E-Book Remedies as a “Draconian and Punitive Intrusion”
- Apple’s Chances for an E-Book Ruling Appeal Are Lousy, Say Legal Scholars
- Apple E-Books Ruling Won’t Do Much For Consumers
- Apple Loses E-Book Antitrust Trial
- Here’s Apple’s Closing Slide Deck in E-Book Case, and the DOJ’s, Too
- Apple: It’s Time to Close the Book on DOJ’s E-Book Case
- Steve Jobs, Winnie the Pooh and the iBook Launch
- The Apple iBooks Origin Story
- Apple’s Cue Says Publishers Pushed for Higher E-Book Prices
- DOJ Misfires on Jobs Email in Apple E-Book Case — It Was a Discarded Draft
- Is Steve Jobs Message a Smoking Gun in Apple E-Book Case?
- Amazon Demanded Same Terms From Publishers For Which Apple is Now On Trial
- Apple Says Differences in Publisher Deals Belie E-Book Conspiracy Charges
- Apple Accuses DOJ of Unfairly Twisting Steve Jobs’s Words
- Apple Says DOJ Is Trying to “Reverse Engineer a Conspiracy” in E-Books Case
- Here’s the DOJ’s E-Book-Pricing Case Against Apple (Slide Deck)
- Apple CEO Tim Cook: “The E-Book Case to Me Is Bizarre”
- Judge in E-Book Pricing Case Thinks Apple’s Going Down; Apple Begs to Differ
- Here’s That Steve Jobs E-Book Email to James Murdoch
- Apple’s E-Book Argument: Deals With Publishers Improved Competition
- DOJ Filing Calls Apple “Ringmaster” of E-Book Pricing Rise
- Apple Alone Fighting DOJ E-Book Suit After Macmillan Settlement
- Apple’s Cook Must Testify in E-Book Antitrust Suit