Apple Accuses DOJ of Unfairly Twisting Steve Jobs’s Words
Steve Jobs figures prominently in the U.S. Department of Justice’s e-book price-fixing case against Apple. His email messages to other executives at Apple and in the publishing industry, and his comments to biographer Walter Isaacson and others, have been gathered up by the agency and offered as proof of a conspiracy in which he was allegedly “the chief ringmaster.”
How does Apple rebut such accusations when Jobs is no longer around to help in mounting a defense by explaining those remarks himself?
That’s a key issue for Apple’s legal team as it spars with government attorneys who characterized Jobs’s various remarks as “direct evidence” and “published admissions” of conspiracy. So what’s the strategy for dealing with it?
By casting the government’s use of Jobs’s remarks as untoward and shady. And in his opening argument on Monday, Apple attorney Orin Snyder did exactly that, questioning the fairness of even using them as evidence, and lambasting the government for purposely taking Jobs’s remarks out of context.
Said Snyder, “There’s something inherently unfair and uncomfortable about placing such reliance on the out-of-court statements of someone who’s not here to explain them or place them into context — particularly when in almost every instance the government either omits key language to draw an inference, or blatantly mischaracterizes what the statements mean.”
So, in Apple’s eyes, not only is the DOJ cherry-picking Jobs’s remarks for maximum effect, it’s spinning them as something that they really aren’t. How do we know that? Because, according to Snyder, Jobs would never have been so foolish as make such potentially damning comments publicly.
Here’s Snyder again:
“To believe that [Jobs's] statements are direct, unambiguous evidence, admissions of a conspiracy, you have to credit the notion that he, in full public view and to his authorized biographer [whose book] he knew would be read by millions of people, made statements that can be interpreted in no other way than as unambiguous admissions of the price-fixing conspiracy charged in this case.”
And knowing what we know of Jobs, that is a tough notion to credit, indeed.
Certainly anything is possible, but the idea that Jobs — a CEO as savvy as they come — would ever publicly volunteer details about Apple’s interest or participation in an alleged e-book price-fixing scheme is pretty far-fetched. More to the point, without Jobs around to speak to the ideas behind those remarks or his state of mind when he made them, it’s very difficult to determine whether they support Apple’s prosecution or its defense.
Said Snyder, “We can’t read Mr. Jobs’s mind, but what we can do is look at the words he used, and they certainly aren’t unambiguous admissions of a conspiracy.”
- Apple Doesn’t Want to Pay the Feds’ E-Book Lawyer $70,000 a Week
- Apple Files Expected Appeal of E-Book Injunction
- Apple’s E-Book Punishment Court Order is Final, and Not as Bad as Apple Feared
- The Incredible Shrinking Apple E-Book Remedy
- Apple Says DOJ’s E-Book Remedies Are Biased in Amazon’s Favor
- DOJ Softens Proposed Apple Ebook Injunctions, Slightly
- Apple Slams Feds’ Proposed E-Book Remedies as a “Draconian and Punitive Intrusion”
- Apple’s Chances for an E-Book Ruling Appeal Are Lousy, Say Legal Scholars
- Apple E-Books Ruling Won’t Do Much For Consumers
- Apple Loses E-Book Antitrust Trial
- Here’s Apple’s Closing Slide Deck in E-Book Case, and the DOJ’s, Too
- Apple: It’s Time to Close the Book on DOJ’s E-Book Case
- Steve Jobs, Winnie the Pooh and the iBook Launch
- The Apple iBooks Origin Story
- Apple’s Cue Says Publishers Pushed for Higher E-Book Prices
- DOJ Misfires on Jobs Email in Apple E-Book Case — It Was a Discarded Draft
- Is Steve Jobs Message a Smoking Gun in Apple E-Book Case?
- Amazon Demanded Same Terms From Publishers For Which Apple is Now On Trial
- Apple Says Differences in Publisher Deals Belie E-Book Conspiracy Charges
- Apple Accuses DOJ of Unfairly Twisting Steve Jobs’s Words
- Apple Says DOJ Is Trying to “Reverse Engineer a Conspiracy” in E-Books Case
- Here’s the DOJ’s E-Book-Pricing Case Against Apple (Slide Deck)
- Apple CEO Tim Cook: “The E-Book Case to Me Is Bizarre”
- Judge in E-Book Pricing Case Thinks Apple’s Going Down; Apple Begs to Differ
- Here’s That Steve Jobs E-Book Email to James Murdoch
- Apple’s E-Book Argument: Deals With Publishers Improved Competition
- DOJ Filing Calls Apple “Ringmaster” of E-Book Pricing Rise
- Apple Alone Fighting DOJ E-Book Suit After Macmillan Settlement
- Apple’s Cook Must Testify in E-Book Antitrust Suit