<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Amy Schatz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/amy-schatz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>SOPA Bill Faces New Hurdles</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20120118/sopa-bill-faces-new-hurdles/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20120118/sopa-bill-faces-new-hurdles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz, Siobhan Hughes, Geoffrey Fowler and Christopher S. Stewart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher S. Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siobhan Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=164893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Antipiracy bills in Congress faced new hurdles Wednesday as House Speaker John Boehner said the legislation wasn't ready for a vote and more than a half-dozen senators expressed reservations in some form.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antipiracy bills in Congress faced new hurdles Wednesday as House Speaker John Boehner said the legislation wasn&#8217;t ready for a vote and more than a half-dozen senators expressed reservations in some form.</p>
<p>Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, was among the most significant shifts. He said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that the bill is &#8220;simply not ready for prime time.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204555904577168843130020190.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20120118/sopa-bill-faces-new-hurdles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Approves AT&amp;T Purchase of Qualcomm Licenses</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111222/fcc-approves-att-purchase-of-qualcomm-licenses/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111222/fcc-approves-att-purchase-of-qualcomm-licenses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airwaves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=156493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal regulators approved AT&#038;T Inc.'s $1.9 billion acquisition of airwaves from Qualcomm Inc. Thursday, giving AT&#038;T a much-needed boost after its deal to acquire T-Mobile USA fell apart.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal regulators approved AT&#038;T Inc.&#8217;s $1.9 billion acquisition of airwaves from Qualcomm Inc. Thursday, giving AT&#038;T a much-needed boost after its deal to acquire T-Mobile USA fell apart.</p>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission signed off on the deal Thursday on a 3-1 vote, with minor conditions, FCC officials said. The approval means that AT&#038;T and Qualcomm could close the deal by the end of the year.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204464404577115020678651082.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111222/fcc-approves-att-purchase-of-qualcomm-licenses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LightSquared Network Could Block GPS Devices, Report Says</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111210/lightsquared-network-could-block-gps-devices-report-says/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111210/lightsquared-network-could-block-gps-devices-report-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS interference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightsquared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=152675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New government tests show wireless start-up LightSquared's network could knock out a "great majority" of GPS devices, according to a congressional aide who has seen a draft government report on the tests.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New government tests show wireless start-up LightSquared&#8217;s network could knock out a &#8220;great majority&#8221; of GPS devices, according to a congressional aide who has seen a draft government report on the tests.</p>
<p>Preliminary data from recent government and industry tests of LightSquared&#8217;s network suggest that the start-up hasn&#8217;t solved concerns that its network would knock out a large number of personal or military GPS devices, the report said, according to the aide.</p>
<p>LightSquared, a startup funded largely by hedge fund Harbinger Capital Partners, wants to build a national wireless broadband network and offer wholesale Internet access to companies including Leap Wireless International Inc. and Best Buy Co.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203413304577089082840505866.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111210/lightsquared-network-could-block-gps-devices-report-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Blasts AT&amp;T Deal</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111130/fcc-blasts-att-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111130/fcc-blasts-att-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz and Greg Bensinger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Bensinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=148453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal regulators issued a stinging 109-page analysis of AT&#038;T Inc.'s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA, saying it would limit competition in virtually every U.S. city and lead to higher prices for customers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal regulators issued a stinging 109-page analysis of AT&#038;T Inc.&#8217;s proposed $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA, saying it would limit competition in virtually every U.S. city and lead to higher prices for customers.</p>
<p>The decision to release the analysis &#8212; which came despite AT&#038;T&#8217;s objections &#8212; marked the latest blow to the deal, which is on life support after a lawsuit by the Justice Department and criticism from the Federal Communications Commission.</p>
<p>The FCC said last week it wanted to call a trial-like hearing to review the deal. AT&#038;T responded by pulling its application at the FCC and the agency, after some discussion over the weekend, agreed Tuesday to let the withdrawal go through.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204449804577068562250634398.html?mod=technology_newsreel">Read the rest of this post on the original site &#187;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111130/fcc-blasts-att-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Members Voice Piracy-Bill Support</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111116/house-members-voice-piracy-bill-support/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111116/house-members-voice-piracy-bill-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Judiciary Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stop Online Piracy Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=144984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee expressed support Wednesday for new legislation aimed at cutting off funding to foreign websites offering pirated movies or counterfeit goods, despite opposition from Silicon Valley companies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee expressed support Wednesday for new legislation aimed at cutting off funding to foreign websites offering pirated movies or counterfeit goods, despite opposition from Silicon Valley companies.</p>
<p>At a hearing, the committee debated the Stop Online Piracy Act, which would give the U.S. attorney general new authority to shut down U.S. financial support to &#8220;rogue&#8221; foreign websites that sell pirated movies, music or other counterfeit goods. The Justice Department could ask for a court order to compel U.S. search engines and other sites to block domain names or search results.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203699404577042280509900696.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111116/house-members-voice-piracy-bill-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Firms Fight Antipiracy Bill</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111116/tech-firms-fight-antipiracy-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111116/tech-firms-fight-antipiracy-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=144713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading technology companies including Google Inc. and eBay Inc. are stepping up efforts to block a bill in Congress that Hollywood studios say would clamp down on foreign websites selling pirated movies and other goods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leading technology companies including Google Inc. and eBay Inc. are stepping up efforts to block a bill in Congress that Hollywood studios say would clamp down on foreign websites selling pirated movies and other goods.</p>
<p>Ahead of a House hearing Wednesday, nine tech companies sent a letter Tuesday to congressional leaders saying the legislation would &#8220;expose law-abiding U.S. Internet and technology companies to new uncertain liabilities.&#8221;</p>
<p>The bill would let the U.S. attorney general seek court orders requiring U.S. Internet sites and search engines to take reasonable measures to block access to other websites carrying pirated material. That could compel them to block domain names and search results featuring those sites.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203503204577040463756532158.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEADTop">Read the rest of this post on the original site &#187;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111116/tech-firms-fight-antipiracy-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Approves Subsidy-Fund Overhaul</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111027/fcc-approves-subsidy-fund-overhaul/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111027/fcc-approves-subsidy-fund-overhaul/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone subsidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Service Fund]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=137465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal regulators approved an overhaul of an $8 billion federal phone-subsidy program Thursday to make more federal money available to fund high-speed Internet service in rural America.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal regulators approved an overhaul of an $8 billion federal phone-subsidy program Thursday to make more federal money available to fund high-speed Internet service in rural America.</p>
<p>In a unanimous vote, the Federal Communications Commission&#8217;s commissioners approved a remake of the federal Universal Service Fund, which subsidizes phone service in rural America and to low-income Americans. The agency will shift the fund&#8217;s $8 billion from funding phone service to high-speed broadband service over the next few years.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203554104577001883317141966.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111027/fcc-approves-subsidy-fund-overhaul/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cellphone Users to Get Billing Alerts Under New Voluntary Standards</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111017/cellphone-users-to-get-billing-alerts-under-new-voluntary-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111017/cellphone-users-to-get-billing-alerts-under-new-voluntary-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=132767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wireless-phone customers will begin receiving real-time alerts next year if they are about to go over their monthly voice, data or text-message limits under new voluntary industry standards set to be announced on Monday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wireless-phone customers will begin receiving real-time alerts next year if they are about to go over their monthly voice, data or text-message limits under new voluntary industry standards set to be announced on Monday.</p>
<p>Wireless carriers have agreed to send warnings to consumers in danger of exceeding their monthly subscriber minutes or data plans under a deal with the Federal Communications Commission. The companies will provide the alerts to consumers within 12 to 18 months, FCC officials said.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203658804576635053172551850.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111017/cellphone-users-to-get-billing-alerts-under-new-voluntary-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality Case Heads to D.C. Circuit Court</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111007/net-neutrality-case-heads-to-d-c-circuit-court/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111007/net-neutrality-case-heads-to-d-c-circuit-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 07:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=129914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Efforts by public interest groups to get a legal challenge to the Federal Communications Commission’s new “net neutrality” rules heard somewhere other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit belly-flopped Thursday when the D.C. Court won the case in a random lottery.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Efforts by public interest groups to get a legal challenge to the Federal Communications Commission’s new “net neutrality” rules heard somewhere other than the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit belly-flopped Thursday when the D.C. Court won the case in a random lottery.</p>
<p>It was a significant victory for opponents of net neutrality rules because the court has been skeptical of the FCC’s authority to enforce such rules in the past.</p>
<p>“The FCC stands ready to defend its open Internet order in any court of appeals,” an FCC spokesman said Thursday.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/10/06/net-neutrality-case-heads-to-d-c-circuit-court/?mod=WSJBlog&#038;mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site &#187;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111007/net-neutrality-case-heads-to-d-c-circuit-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Sued Over "Net Neutrality"</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110929/fcc-sued-over-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110929/fcc-sued-over-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=126287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fresh legal salvo was fired Wednesday over recently published federal "net neutrality" rules restricting Internet providers from blocking or slowing traffic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fresh legal salvo was fired Wednesday over recently published federal &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; rules restricting Internet providers from blocking or slowing traffic.</p>
<p>On Wednesday public interest group Free Press filed a lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission rules in a Boston-based federal appeals court, saying they didn&#8217;t protect wireless Internet users enough.</p>
<p>In the complaint, the group argued the FCC acted arbitrarily when it decided to &#8220;adopt one set of rules for broadband access via mobile platforms and a different set of rules for broadband access via fixed platforms.&#8221;</p>
<p>The rules take effect November 20.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204138204576599130907172662.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site &#187;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110929/fcc-sued-over-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For LightSquared, a High Bar</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110928/for-lightsquared-a-high-bar/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110928/for-lightsquared-a-high-bar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightsquared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=125768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To make good on its planned $14 billion investment in a national high-speed wireless network, start-up LightSquared Inc. must prove to the government that its network is perfect, or nearly so, in avoiding interference with global-positioning devices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To make good on its planned $14 billion investment in a national high-speed wireless network, start-up LightSquared Inc. must prove to the government that its network is perfect, or nearly so, in avoiding interference with global-positioning devices. And that&#8217;s just one of its challenges.</p>
<p>A November deadline is approaching for federal regulators to finish their interference tests, raising the stakes for a project already confronting financial hurdles and political resistance.</p>
<p>Amid complaints by GPS users, company officials say they realize the bar will be high for the start-up to show its network won&#8217;t disrupt other traffic.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204010604576597113757325984.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site &#187;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110928/for-lightsquared-a-high-bar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If AT&amp;T Prevails at Trial, It Faces Battle With FCC</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110902/if-att-prevails-at-trial-it-faces-battle-with-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110902/if-att-prevails-at-trial-it-faces-battle-with-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Telekom AG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=116428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if AT&#038;T Inc. wins its court fight with the Justice Department over its bid to acquire Deutsche Telekom AG's T-Mobile USA for $39 billion, the deal could still be torpedoed by the Federal Communications Commission, which has shown little liking for the combination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if AT&#038;T Inc. wins its court fight with the Justice Department over its bid to acquire Deutsche Telekom AG&#8217;s T-Mobile USA for $39 billion, the deal could still be torpedoed by the Federal Communications Commission, which has shown little liking for the combination.</p>
<p>The Justice Department, which filed suit Wednesday in federal court to block the acquisition, and the FCC are separate agencies with different standards for assessing mergers. But the two worked together as the Justice Department prepared its suit, and the FCC has never approved a deal that the Justice Department rejected, according to FCC officials.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a DOJ decision, but there was a lot of input from [FCC Chairman Julius] Genachowski&#8217;s team,&#8221; an FCC official said Thursday of the ruling.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903895904576544911382577794.html?mod=technology_newsreel">Read the rest of this post on the original site &#187;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110902/if-att-prevails-at-trial-it-faces-battle-with-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Report on Wireless Market Offers Few Clues on AT&amp;T Bid for T-Mobile</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110628/fcc-report-on-wireless-market-offers-few-clues-on-att-bid-for-t-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110628/fcc-report-on-wireless-market-offers-few-clues-on-att-bid-for-t-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=91802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal telecommunications regulators took a neutral position on whether the wireless industry is competitive in a new report on the mobile market released Monday, but offered few clues as to how it might rule on AT&#038;T Inc.'s bid to acquire T-Mobile USA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal telecommunications regulators took a neutral position on whether the wireless industry is competitive in a new report on the mobile market released Monday, but offered few clues as to how it might rule on AT&#038;T Inc.&#8217;s bid to acquire T-Mobile USA. </p>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission found for the second straight year that the wireless phone market has grown more concentrated over the years.</p>
<p>The FCC stayed neutral on whether the industry is competitive. Before 2010, the FCC found that the wireless phone market was &#8220;effectively competitive&#8221; for several years.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304314404576412590788285946.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110628/fcc-report-on-wireless-market-offers-few-clues-on-att-bid-for-t-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Will Weigh Phone-Fee Rules</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110621/fcc-will-weigh-phone-fee-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110621/fcc-will-weigh-phone-fee-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=88865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission will begin considering new rules to prevent phone companies from adding unauthorized fees to consumers' monthly bills.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Communications Commission will begin considering new rules to prevent phone companies from adding unauthorized fees to consumers&#8217; monthly bills.</p>
<p>FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said Monday the agency would begin considering a proposal to &#8220;explore new ways to empower consumers and protect Americans against cramming and mystery fees.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cramming is a term used to describe a phone company&#8217;s inclusion of an unauthorized or misleading charge in monthly bills. FCC officials offered an example of a Saint Louis woman who was charged for long-distance service for more than two years even though she hadn&#8217;t signed up for it.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303936704576397563960100314.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site »</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110621/fcc-will-weigh-phone-fee-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cellphone Companies Defend Privacy Practices</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110429/cellphone-companies-defend-privacy-practices/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110429/cellphone-companies-defend-privacy-practices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer E. Ante and Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Barton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[location data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer E. Ante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint Nextel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T_Mobile USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless carriers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=39574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. lawmakers called for closer scrutiny of developers that make software for mobile phones, after wireless carriers highlighted them as a weak spot in keeping smartphone users' locations private.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. lawmakers called for closer scrutiny of developers that make software for mobile phones, after wireless carriers highlighted them as a weak spot in keeping smartphone users&#8217; locations private.</p>
<p>The concerns were expressed in a letter released Thursday by Rep. Joe Barton (R., Texas) and Rep. Edward Markey (D., Mass) after the lawmakers asked the four main U.S. wireless carriers to explain their policies for collecting and storing location data.</p>
<p>The carriers&#8211;AT&#038;T Inc., Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel Corp. and T-Mobile USA&#8211;said they seek subscribers&#8217; consent before tracking their location, but said they can&#8217;t control how applications developed by third parties use location information that the carriers don&#8217;t provide.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704463804576291530878321682.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110429/cellphone-companies-defend-privacy-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Seeking Friends in Beltway</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110420/facebook-seeking-friends-in-beltway/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110420/facebook-seeking-friends-in-beltway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Williamson, Amy Schatz and Geoffrey A. Fowler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Williamson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoffrey A. Fowler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=39124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Barack Obama will travel to Facebook Inc.'s Silicon Valley headquarters Wednesday to hold a "town hall" meeting on the economy with users of the social-networking site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama will travel to Facebook Inc.&#8217;s Silicon Valley headquarters Wednesday to hold a &#8220;town hall&#8221; meeting on the economy with users of the social-networking site.</p>
<p>But Facebook is still trying to find a path to Washington, where the company has only a fledgling lobbying operation, even though it finds its privacy policies under increasing scrutiny and is trying to navigate a politically sensitive expansion into China.</p>
<p>In seven years, Facebook has risen from a tiny start-up to an Internet power with a potential market value estimated at more than $50 billion. Now an online forum with more than 600 million users, Facebook faces growing pressure from lawmakers and regulators concerned about the way it uses personal information shared by its users.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703789104576273242590724876.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEADTop">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110420/facebook-seeking-friends-in-beltway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Digs In for a D.C. Fight</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110322/att-digs-in-for-a-d-c-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110322/att-digs-in-for-a-d-c-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shayndi Raice, Amy Schatz and Anupreeta Das</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anupreeta Das]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.P Morgan Chase & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shayndi Raice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wirless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=37951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies never want to see their merger talks leak, but AT&#038;T Inc. was especially concerned.

Will the proposed AT&#038;T purchase of T-Mobile pass regulatory muster? The 'digits' panel looks at lawmakers' feelings and how consumers will fare.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies never want to see their merger talks leak, but AT&#038;T Inc. was especially concerned.</p>
<p>Will the proposed AT&#038;T purchase of T-Mobile pass regulatory muster? The &#8216;digits&#8217; panel looks at lawmakers&#8217; feelings and how consumers will fare.</p>
<p>The former Baby Bell, which built itself up through a decade of acquisitions into the country&#8217;s largest telecommunications company, was planning to buy T-Mobile USA, a deal that would test its skilled regulatory team in Washington.</p>
<p>The combination would bring together the second and fourth largest U.S. wireless operators by revenue, creating a giant in an already concentrated market. People familiar with the matter said AT&#038;T executives, fearing a leak could build regulatory opposition even before the two sides agreed on a deal, kept the number of banks involved strictly limited for weeks. It leaned on J.P. Morgan Chase &#038; Co. alone to provide a $20 billion loan.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704355304576215012309574044.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEADTop">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110322/att-digs-in-for-a-d-c-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP Attacks Internet Rules</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110217/gop-attacks-internet-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110217/gop-attacks-internet-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fred Upton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Energy and Commerce Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=36462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a contentious hearing, House Republicans attacked new regulations for broadband Internet lines and criticized the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission for adopting them.

Republicans are targeting the "net neutrality" rules, which would bar Internet providers from blocking or slowing Internet traffic and services, as well as new regulations in such areas as health care and the environment, as unnecessary and overly burdensome on industry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a contentious hearing, House Republicans attacked new regulations for broadband Internet lines and criticized the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission for adopting them.</p>
<p>Republicans are targeting the &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; rules, which would bar Internet providers from blocking or slowing Internet traffic and services, as well as new regulations in such areas as health care and the environment, as unnecessary and overly burdensome on industry.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why would you put the government in charge of the Internet?&#8221; asked Rep. Fred Upton (R., Mich.), who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee.</p>
<p>FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, a Democrat, defended the new rules during the hearing, saying the FCC &#8220;did the right thing&#8221; and that it is &#8220;pro-job and pro-investment&#8221; for the U.S. economy.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703373404576148252022232180.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110217/gop-attacks-internet-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hand-Wringing in Comcast-NBC Deal</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110114/hand-wringing-in-comcast-nbc-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110114/hand-wringing-in-comcast-nbc-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz and Jessica E. Vascellaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jessica E. Vascellaro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=35234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Major media companies are raising concerns that government conditions on Comcast Corp.'s impending deal to acquire control of NBC Universal from General Electric Co. could put them at a disadvantage in future negotiations to shape the burgeoning online video market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major media companies are raising concerns that government conditions on Comcast Corp.&#8217;s impending deal to acquire control of NBC Universal from General Electric Co. could put them at a disadvantage in future negotiations to shape the burgeoning online video market.</p>
<p>At issue is a condition proposed by the Federal Communications Commission that would require Comcast to offer NBC programming to any online video service that has reached a similar deal for content from at least one of NBC&#8217;s competitors, such as Walt Disney Co. or News Corp.</p>
<p>Lobbyists for both Disney and News Corp., along with Time Warner Inc. Chief Executive Jeff Bewkes, have been voicing their concerns this week with the FCC, worried that such conditions could undermine their own efforts to profit from the nascent online video industry. News Corp. owns The Wall Street Journal.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704307404576080331124623362.html?mod=wsj_share_twitter">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110114/hand-wringing-in-comcast-nbc-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cupcake-Gate at the FCC</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101216/cupcake-gate-at-the-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101216/cupcake-gate-at-the-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=34050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission officials busy working on net neutrality, the pending Comcast-NBC deal and other issues got a sweet treat Wednesday afternoon, when AT&#038;T Inc. representatives did their annual holiday cupcake drop-off throughout the building.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal Communications Commission officials busy working on net neutrality, the pending Comcast-NBC deal and other issues got a sweet treat Wednesday afternoon, when AT&#038;T Inc. representatives did their annual holiday cupcake drop-off throughout the building.</p>
<p>AT&#038;T dropped off about 127 dozen cupcakes throughout the agency, according to a delivery list acquired by Public Knowledge, a digital-rights public interest group that’s been heavily lobbying on the net neutrality issue this week.</p>
<p>That’s roughly $3,700 worth of cupcakes from Georgetown Cupcake, a gourmet cupcake store.</p>
<p>“We’re pro-open Internet and pro-cupcake,” and FCC spokeswoman said.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/12/15/cupcake-gate-at-the-fcc/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&#038;mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101216/cupcake-gate-at-the-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Makes It Slightly Easier to Pull Plug on Cable Box Rentals</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101015/fcc-makes-it-slightly-easier-to-pull-plug-on-cable-box-rentals/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101015/fcc-makes-it-slightly-easier-to-pull-plug-on-cable-box-rentals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CableCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[set-top boxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=31134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s been 14 years since Congress first instructed the Federal Communications Commission to make it easier for consumers to avoid cable-TV set-top box rental fees. The agency is still working on that one, but on Thursday it approved some new rules to help give consumers a few more choices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been 14 years since Congress first instructed the Federal Communications Commission to make it easier for consumers to avoid cable-TV set-top box rental fees. The agency is still working on that one, but on Thursday it approved some new rules to help give consumers a few more choices.</p>
<p>The agency tweaked its so-called “CableCard” rules to make it easier for consumer electronics makers to make cable-ready TVs and other devices and for consumers to install them.</p>
<p>Cable-ready TVs and set-top boxes have been around for years, but consumers haven’t been able to use them to see some cable programming (like On-Demand movies) because of some technical protections cable companies installed to prevent piracy. The FCC changed its rules slightly to make it easier for consumer electronics makers to produce devices that access all cable channels.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/10/14/fcc-makes-it-slightly-easier-to-pull-plug-on-cable-box-rentals/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&#038;mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101015/fcc-makes-it-slightly-easier-to-pull-plug-on-cable-box-rentals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Calls Off Net Neutrality Talks</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100805/fcc-calls-off-net-neutrality-talks/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100805/fcc-calls-off-net-neutrality-talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Lazarus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Communications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=27985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission officials called off closed-door talks with lobbyists aimed at reaching a compromise on new rules to prevent Internet traffic from being blocked or slowed, saying they couldn't reach a workable compromise.

FCC Chief of Staff Edward Lazarus, in a statement, said the effort "has been productive on several fronts, but has not generated a robust framework to preserve the openness and freedom of the Internet."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal Communications Commission officials called off closed-door talks with lobbyists aimed at reaching a compromise on new rules to prevent Internet traffic from being blocked or slowed, saying they couldn&#8217;t reach a workable compromise.</p>
<p>FCC Chief of Staff Edward Lazarus, in a statement, said the effort &#8220;has been productive on several fronts, but has not generated a robust framework to preserve the openness and freedom of the Internet.&#8221; He added, &#8220;all options remain on the table as we continue to seek broad input on this vital issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>The agency yanked the plug on the private negotiations a day after news broke that Verizon Communications Inc. (VC) and Google Inc. (GOOG) had reached a separate agreement which would allow the phone giant to prioritize some broadband traffic. The companies have not announced the agreement yet.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703748904575411632530886558.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100805/fcc-calls-off-net-neutrality-talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Split as It Moves to Re-Regulate Internet Lines</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100617/fcc-split-as-it-moves-to-re-regulate-internet-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100617/fcc-split-as-it-moves-to-re-regulate-internet-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deragulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Copps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=26173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A split Federal Communications Commission kicked off an effort to re-regulate Internet lines Thursday, releasing for comment a plan to give the agency more authority to police Internet providers.

The FCC's five commissioners voted 3-2 to launch its re-regulation effort, with the agency's two Republican members dissenting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A split Federal Communications Commission kicked off an effort to re-regulate Internet lines Thursday, releasing for comment a plan to give the agency more authority to police Internet providers.</p>
<p>The FCC&#8217;s five commissioners voted 3-2 to launch its re-regulation effort, with the agency&#8217;s two Republican members dissenting. The proposal would reverse a 2002 decision by the FCC that deregulated Internet lines.</p>
<p>The vote basically kicks off the FCC&#8217;s effort to change the way it regulates phone and cable companies&#8217; Internet lines. After a few months of public comment, the agency is expected to issue an order this fall that would implement its changes.</p>
<p>&#8220;We need to reclaim our authority,&#8221; said Democratic FCC Commissioner Michael Copps. &#8220;I, for one, am worried about relying only on the good will of a few powerful companies to achieve this country&#8217;s broadband hopes and dreams.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704289504575312742566475122.html">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100617/fcc-split-as-it-moves-to-re-regulate-internet-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Wants Alerts on Wireless Overages</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100511/fcc-wants-alerts-on-wireless-overages/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100511/fcc-wants-alerts-on-wireless-overages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 18:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill shock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Gurin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=24931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal regulators are proposing new regulations on the wireless phone industry, which would require carriers to alert consumers if they've gone over their monthly data or text message allotments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal regulators are proposing new regulations on the wireless phone industry, which would require carriers to alert consumers if they&#8217;ve gone over their monthly data or text message allotments.</p>
<p>The proposal is similar to rules recently enacted in the European Union on wireless companies, which require carriers to send a text message to subscribers who are racking up roaming charges or getting close to their plan&#8217;s roaming limit.</p>
<p>The Federal Communications Commission proposal also considers whether carriers should send real-time alerts to subscribers who are exceeding their monthly voice, data or text messaging limits.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve gotten hundreds of complaints about bill shock,&#8221; said Joel Gurin, head of the FCC&#8217;s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, in a statement. He said the agency is looking at if &#8220;there&#8217;s any reason that American carriers can&#8217;t use similar automatic alerts to inform consumers when they are at risk of running up a high bill.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704250104575238160307049390.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEFTTopNews">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100511/fcc-wants-alerts-on-wireless-overages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Web Rules Create Pushback</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100507/fcc-web-rules-create-pushback/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100507/fcc-web-rules-create-pushback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 07:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Schatz and Spencer E. Ante</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Schatz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper-wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer E. Ante]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=24766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The head of the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday outlined a proposal for regulating the Internet that he described as a "third way," or middle ground between "heavy-handed" regulation and a do-nothing approach that could hurt competition and leave consumers unprotected.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The head of the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday outlined a proposal for regulating the Internet that he described as a &#8220;third way,&#8221; or middle ground between &#8220;heavy-handed&#8221; regulation and a do-nothing approach that could hurt competition and leave consumers unprotected.</p>
<p>FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski is proposing to promote competition and preserve the free flow of Web traffic by applying to broadband Internet service certain provisions of rules designed to regulate traffic on copper-wire telephone networks.</p>
<p>Big phone and cable companies, which provide much of the nation&#8217;s broadband service, expressed dismay at the FCC chairman&#8217;s decision to extend his regulatory authority to broadband, predicting it would damp investment and lead to court battles that could last years.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228503914251096.html?mod=WSJ_Tech_LEADTop">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100507/fcc-web-rules-create-pushback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

