<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; anti-competitive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/anti-competitive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Retailers vs. Amazon: A Brick-and-Moral Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20111208/retailers-vs-amazon-a-brick-and-moral-dilemma/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20111208/retailers-vs-amazon-a-brick-and-moral-dilemma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tricia Duryee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[but it where you try it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leslie Tweedie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nordstrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Industry Leaders Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthingsd.com/?p=151888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brick-and-mortar retailers are asking consumers to "buy it where you try it" after Amazon disclosed it will be encouraging consumers to treat stores as showrooms through the use of a one-day promotion on Saturday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-152057" title="angel_devil" src="http://allthingsd.com/files/2011/12/angel_devil.png" alt="" width="380" height="285" />Brick-and-mortar retailers are asking consumers to &#8220;buy it where you try it&#8221; after Amazon disclosed it will be encouraging consumers to treat stores as showrooms through the use of a one-day promotion on Saturday.</p>
<p><a href="http://allthingsd.com/20111206/amazon-will-pay-shoppers-5-to-walk-out-of-stores-empty-handed/">Amazon&#8217;s promotion</a> will give shoppers up to $5 off on most purchases made using its price-check application. The event serves as a way for Amazon to increase usage of its bar-code-scanning application, while also collecting intelligence on pricing in the stores.</p>
<p>Large and small retailers alike often consider Amazon one of their toughest competitors, but this time around they say the company&#8217;s initiative is a direct attack.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s wrong to try something in the store and then buy it online,&#8221; said Lesley Tweedie, who owns a bike shop with her husband in Chicago and is hoping that the mantra &#8220;buy it where you try it&#8221; takes off.</p>
<p>Tweedie is also the founder of <a href="http://www.littleindependent.com/">Little Independent</a>, a six-month-old marketplace where local stores can feature products online.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t know what their [Amazon's] motivations are. I would like to believe it&#8217;s about business and it&#8217;s not about deliberately trying to hurt a retailer,&#8221; she said. &#8220;But this affects our little bike shop in Chicago, Target, Wal-Mart or Nordstrom. It affects them all.&#8221;</p>
<p>The promotion brings into question a shopper&#8217;s moral compass just in time for the holidays.</p>
<p>Does price or convenience win? Or, is it more important to shop locally to support jobs and nearby businesses?</p>
<p>From the consumer&#8217;s perspective, it&#8217;s hard to walk away from Amazon&#8217;s offer. The application compares prices, gives product reviews and, on Saturday, will also offer a discount to those who use it to make a purchase online.</p>
<p>Still, it seems consumers are becoming increasingly aware of the online-versus-local debate.</p>
<p>EBay recently conducted an online survey on the subject, and based on more than 1,000 responses, found that nearly 50 percent of shoppers plan to allocate up to half of their holiday budget to buying local this season. EBay says it tries to be an advocate for local stores. Its bar-code scanning app, Red Laser, not only shows people the cheapest price online, but also provides a list of stores where the item can be purchased locally.</p>
<p>Yesterday, the Retail Industry Leaders Association made a much less emotional argument.</p>
<p>Jason Brewer, the association&#8217;s VP of communications and advocacy, said Amazon is anticompetitive because it does not collect sales tax in most states, so it will nearly always have a price advantage over a physical store.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our retailers aren&#8217;t afraid to compete on price &#8212; that&#8217;s a part of retailing,&#8221; he said. &#8220;If the price check app replaces the Sunday newspaper circular, that&#8217;s fine. But what retailers can&#8217;t do is not collect sales tax.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tweedie says the one silver lining of Amazon&#8217;s promotion is that it is bringing the conversation out into the open.</p>
<p>She frequently catches people pulling out their phone in her store and often even hears them wonder out loud if they find it for less on Amazon. &#8220;It&#8217;s hard as a retailer without alienating the shopper. But they&#8217;ve never thought about it, and they aren&#8217;t trying to be rude. &#8230; What I think is so exciting is how many people are talking about this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Amazon will offer the discount on up to three qualifying products in eligible categories, including electronics, toys, music, sporting goods and DVDs, and is anticipating that Saturday will be one of the biggest days of the year for the application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20111208/retailers-vs-amazon-a-brick-and-moral-dilemma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>French Court Fines eBay €1.7 Million</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20091130/french-court-fines-ebay-e1-7-million/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20091130/french-court-fines-ebay-e1-7-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew LaVallee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex von Schirmeister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew LaVallee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auction listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Dior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Givenchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal listings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LVMH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moet Hennessy Louis Viutton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=18505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton said Monday that a French court fined eBay €1.7 million ($2.6 million) over perfume listings, despite filtering technology that the online auctioneer said is screening out unlawful items.

The court accused eBay of “the unlawful marketing” of Christian Dior, Givenchy and other LMVH cosmetics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton said Monday that a French court fined eBay €1.7 million ($2.6 million) over perfume listings, despite filtering technology that the online auctioneer said is screening out unlawful items.</p>
<p>The court accused eBay (EBAY) of “the unlawful marketing” of Christian Dior, Givenchy and other LMVH cosmetics.</p>
<p>EBay said in a statement Monday that it has taken steps to hide LMVH products from French shoppers and that the illegal listings LMVH submitted contain misspelled brand names or only pictures of products, which enabled them to slip through the cracks.</p>
<p>Alex von Schirmeister, eBay’s general manager in France, added that the fine is disproportionate given the company’s compliance, and that the decision enforces “anti-competitive” distribution practices.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/11/30/french-court-fines-ebay-e17-million/?mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20091130/french-court-fines-ebay-e1-7-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Commission Overclocks Intel Antitrust Fine</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090513/european-commission-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090513/european-commission-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash flow positive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone OS 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X Snow Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Otellini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Schiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retailers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seagate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sponsors of Tomorrow"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldwide Developers Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=17624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[ See post to watch video ]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="video-wsj"><object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID=1A1FDAB4-C129-42F8-8B69-300418430809&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="microflashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/microPlayer.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoGUID={1A1FDAB4-C129-42F8-8B69-300418430809}&playerid=4001&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://m.wsj.net/video-players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="microflashPlayer" width="640" height="360" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed><br />[ See post to watch video ]</div></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090513/european-commission-overclocks-intel-antitrust-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odd, the Parental Controls on Sen. Kohl&#039;s Copy of IE Have Been Set to Block YahooGoogleFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominant market position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herb Kohl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a Department of Justice ruling on Google’s advertising partnership with Yahoo expected by late next week, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/yhoo.jpg" alt="" title="yhoo" width="311" height="110" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6183" />With a Department of Justice ruling on Google&#8217;s advertising partnership with Yahoo <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10057136-60.html?tag=newsFeaturedBlogArea.0">expected by late next week</a>, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it. &#8220;Recognizing the nascent and fast-changing nature of this marketplace, we encourage the Department to continue to monitor the state of competition in this industry, whatever the outcome of its current investigation,&#8221; <a href="http://kohl.senate.gov/~kohl/press/08/10/2008A02A35.html">Kohl wrote</a>. &#8220;If, over time, you determine that Google is gaining a dominant market position as a result of the Google-Yahoo agreement, then we would encourage the Justice Department to intervene to protect competition. Even should you conclude at present that this deal is not contrary to antitrust law, the Department must be sure that this deal never in the future crosses the line into an unacceptable, anti-competitive collaboration among competitors which will harm consumers and advertisers.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time Kohl has raised concerns about the long-term implications of Yahoo&#8217;s (YHOO) proposed deal with Google (GOOG). And it almost certainly won&#8217;t be the last. Back in September, he worried aloud that the partnership might reduce Yahoo to &#8220;nothing more than the newest satellite in the Google orbit.&#8221; And nothing much has changed since that time, except for Google&#8217;s increased advocacy of the deal on the new <a href="http://www.google.com/yahoogooglefacts/">&#8220;Yahoo-Google Facts&#8221;</a> site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odd, the Parental Controls on Sen. Kohl's Copy of IE Have Been Set to Block YahooGoogleFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom-2/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-competitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dominant market position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google-Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herb Kohl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=6181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a Department of Justice ruling on Google’s advertising partnership with Yahoo expected by late next week, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/10/yhoo.jpg" alt="" title="yhoo" width="311" height="110" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6183" />With a Department of Justice ruling on Google&#8217;s advertising partnership with Yahoo <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-10057136-60.html?tag=newsFeaturedBlogArea.0">expected by late next week</a>, a key legislator is urging further scrutiny of the deal. In a letter to the DOJ, Sen. Herb Kohl of Wisconsin, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, encouraged it to monitor the Google-Yahoo deal, even if the agency signs off on it. &#8220;Recognizing the nascent and fast-changing nature of this marketplace, we encourage the Department to continue to monitor the state of competition in this industry, whatever the outcome of its current investigation,&#8221; <a href="http://kohl.senate.gov/~kohl/press/08/10/2008A02A35.html">Kohl wrote</a>. &#8220;If, over time, you determine that Google is gaining a dominant market position as a result of the Google-Yahoo agreement, then we would encourage the Justice Department to intervene to protect competition. Even should you conclude at present that this deal is not contrary to antitrust law, the Department must be sure that this deal never in the future crosses the line into an unacceptable, anti-competitive collaboration among competitors which will harm consumers and advertisers.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time Kohl has raised concerns about the long-term implications of Yahoo&#8217;s (YHOO) proposed deal with Google (GOOG). And it almost certainly won&#8217;t be the last. Back in September, he worried aloud that the partnership might reduce Yahoo to &#8220;nothing more than the newest satellite in the Google orbit.&#8221; And nothing much has changed since that time, except for Google&#8217;s increased advocacy of the deal on the new <a href="http://www.google.com/yahoogooglefacts/">&#8220;Yahoo-Google Facts&#8221;</a> site. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20081003/odd-the-parental-controls-on-sen-kohls-copy-of-ie-have-been-set-to-block-yahoogooglefactscom-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

