<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; attorneys general</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/attorneys-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:35:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>States Want a Closer Look at Google&#039;s Street View Data Gathering</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100721/states-want-a-closer-look-at-googles-street-view-data-gathering/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100721/states-want-a-closer-look-at-googles-street-view-data-gathering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Voices</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsbyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=27430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A multistate inquiry into what Google says was the inadvertent gathering of Wi-Fi data by its Street View cars now has 37 attorneys general on board and some specific questions. Connecticut AG Richard Blumenthal, who is spearheading the effort, sent a letter to the company today asking who inserted the data collection code into the Street View software, whether the software had been tested to see if it snagged any consumer data, and how many states were affected. Blumenthal asked for a response by Friday and said the states "will take all appropriate steps--including potential legal action if warranted--to obtain complete, comprehensive answers." A Google spokeswoman--maintaining that the data-gathering was a mistake, but not illegal--said the company was continuing to cooperate with all inquiries into the issue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100621/state-ags-to-probe-googles-deeply-disturbing-invasion-of-wi-fi-data/">multistate inquiry</a> into what Google says was the inadvertent gathering of Wi-Fi data by its Street View cars now has 37 attorneys general on board and some specific questions. Connecticut AG Richard Blumenthal, who is spearheading the effort, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66K41N20100721">sent a letter to the company today</a> asking who inserted the data collection code into the Street View software, whether the software had been tested to see if it snagged any consumer data, and how many states were affected. Blumenthal asked for a response by Friday and said the states &#8220;will take all appropriate steps&#8211;including potential legal action if warranted&#8211;to obtain complete, comprehensive answers.&#8221; A Google spokeswoman&#8211;maintaining that the data-gathering was a mistake, but not illegal&#8211;said the company was continuing to cooperate with all inquiries into the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100721/states-want-a-closer-look-at-googles-street-view-data-gathering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ Confirms Antitrust Investigation Into Google Book Settlement</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090702/doj-officially-opens-antitrust-investigation-into-google-book-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090702/doj-officially-opens-antitrust-investigation-into-google-book-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Stricker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mountain View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orphaned works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherman Antitrust Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=20671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the fireworks have begun early in Mountain View. On Thursday afternoon, the Department of Justice officially notified Google that it is investigating its book deal for violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The notification after the jump.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2009/07/googfireworks.jpg" alt="googfireworks" title="googfireworks" width="150" height="57" class="alignright size-full wp-image-20685" />Looks like the fireworks have begun early in Mountain View&#8230;</p>
<p>The Justice Department probe of the Google Books settlement is heating up. On Thursday afternoon, the agency officially opened an investigation into the deal, which would allow the search sovereign to make millions of books available online.</p>
<p>“The United States has reviewed public comments expressing concern that aspects of the settlement agreement may violate the Sherman Act,” wrote William F. Cavanaugh, a deputy assistant attorney general. “At this preliminary stage, the United States has reached no conclusions as to the merit of those concerns or more broadly what impact this settlement may have on competition. However, we have determined that the issues raised by the proposed settlement warrant further inquiry.”</p>
<p>The move is the strongest sign yet that the DOJ may block the settlement, which critics claim would grant Google (GOOG) a monopoly on orphaned works&#8211;copyrighted texts without an identifiable copyright holder. The notification, included below, is the first time the DOJ has confirmed the investigation publicly and said that it is indeed looking at possible violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act.</p>
<p>Odd that the letter was filed this week inasmuch as the &#8220;fairness hearing&#8221; that will determine whether final approval is given to the settlement is still months away.  Clearly, <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/google-makes-a-case-that-it-isnt-so-big/">Google&#8217;s recent public relations offensive</a> claiming the company is just as vulnerable to competition as anyone else hasn’t had much effect.</p>
<p>Reached for comment, Google spokesperson Gabriel Stricker offered the following statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Department of Justice and several state attorneys general have contacted us to learn more about the impact of the settlement, and we are happy to answer their questions.</p>
<p>It’s important to note that this agreement is non-exclusive and if approved by the court, stands to expand access to millions of books in the U.S.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><object id="_ds_8068529" name="_ds_8068529" width="350 " height="550" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://viewer.docstoc.com/"><param name="FlashVars" value="doc_id=8068529&#038;mem_id=780373&#038;doc_type=pdf&#038;fullscreen=0&#038;showrelated=0&#038;showotherdocs=0&#038;showstats=0 "/><param name="movie" value="http://viewer.docstoc.com/" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /></object> <br /> <font size="1"><a href="http://www.docstoc.com/docs/8068529/2009.07.02 Order _ DOJ Letter"> 2009.07.02 Order _ DOJ Letter</a> &#8211; </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090702/doj-officially-opens-antitrust-investigation-into-google-book-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

