<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AllThingsD &#187; Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthingsd.com/tag/bush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthingsd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:18:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/>		<item>
		<title>Apple&#039;s D.C. Lobbying Efforts Get Fierce</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20110204/apples-d-c-lobbying-efforts-get-fierce/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20110204/apples-d-c-lobbying-efforts-get-fierce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coca-Cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fierce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isakowitz and Blalock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=57226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple closed its big government affairs office in Washington, D.C., in the late &#8217;90s and since that time has maintained a fairly low profile inside the Beltway, relative to other big tech firms. But now the company has hired a high-powered new lobbying firm: Fierce, Isakowitz and Blalock.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2011/02/fib.jpg" alt="" title="fib" width="380" height="381" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-57232" />Apple closed its big government affairs office in Washington, D.C., in the late &#8217;90s and since that time has maintained <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientlbs.php?lname=Apple+Inc&amp;year=2010">a fairly low profile inside the Beltway</a>, relative to other big tech firms.</p>
<p>Its 2010 lobbying spend was <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?lname=Apple+Inc&amp;year=2010">about $1.6 million</a>. (Microsoft&#8217;s was <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?lname=Microsoft+Corp&amp;year=2010">$6.9 million</a>.) But while it might seem that any lobbying Apple might need to do in Washington could be easily accomplished by a phone call from one of its directors&#8211;<a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/bios/gore.html">one in particular</a>&#8211;evidently that&#8217;s not the case. Because the company has hired a new lobbying firm to help deal with its D.C. concerns:  Fierce, Isakowitz and Blalock.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not clear why Apple hired the firm; lobbying disclosures say only that it will handle “innovation” issues for the company, and sources I&#8217;ve spoken with seem unaware of any big legislative pushes the company might be mulling. That said, Fierce, Isakowitz and Blalock is a formidable lobbying firm with <a href="http://fierce-isakowitz.com/Professionals.html">a number of executives who did stints in the Bush administration</a> and the Republican National Committee, and  <a href="http://fierce-isakowitz.com/Clients.html">a client list</a> that includes some very big names: Coca-Cola, CTIA, the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, Ford, Time Warner and Oracle.</p>
<p> Think Larry Ellison got a referral fee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20110204/apples-d-c-lobbying-efforts-get-fierce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Bush-Era Tax Cuts Expire, VCs Nearly Split On Impact</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20101012/as-bush-era-tax-cuts-expire-vcs-nearly-split-on-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20101012/as-bush-era-tax-cuts-expire-vcs-nearly-split-on-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Hay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLA Piper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Technology Leaders Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term capital gains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Astiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start-ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Hay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Venture Capital Dispatch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=30967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Congress debates whether or not to extend Bush-era tax cuts for some of the country’s wealthiest people, many in the financial community have said the cuts should be left in place, as the benefits will trickle down to the broader economy.

But venture capitalists surveyed by law firm DLA Piper LLC are nearly split on whether letting the tax cuts expire would have an effect on the technology sector, or their firms’ pace of investments in tech companies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Congress debates whether or not to extend Bush-era tax cuts for some of the country’s wealthiest people, many in the financial community have said the cuts should be left in place, as the benefits will trickle down to the broader economy.</p>
<p>But venture capitalists surveyed by law firm DLA Piper LLC are nearly split on whether letting the tax cuts expire would have an effect on the technology sector, or their firms’ pace of investments in tech companies.</p>
<p>According to the survey to be released today at the Global Technology Leaders Summit, 55 percent of venture investors came out against letting the long-term capital gains rates, currently at 15 percent, increase to 20 percent in 2011 at the sunset of a series of Bush-era tax cuts. They believe the expiration would result in reducing investments in start-up tech companies.</p>
<p>Peter Astiz, a global co-head of the firm’s technology sector, said he was surprised that percentage wasn’t higher, though.</p>
<p>“You’d think from reading all the blogs that everyone [in the investment community] is up in arms about this,” Astiz said. “The response was very muted. Forty-five percent of respondents said it would have no impact on investment.”</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2010/10/12/as-bush-era-tax-cuts-expire-vcs-nearly-split-on-impact/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&#038;mod=tech">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20101012/as-bush-era-tax-cuts-expire-vcs-nearly-split-on-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Bill Gates Support New Income Tax for Wealthy?</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100922/will-bill-gates-support-new-income-tax-for-wealthy/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100922/will-bill-gates-support-new-income-tax-for-wealthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Frank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates Sr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-1098]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wealth Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=30179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the tax-the-rich debate these days is focused on the Bush tax cuts. But there’s another fiercely contested battle over taxing the wealthy that’s raging in Washington. It aims to create a new state income tax for those earning $200,000 or more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the tax-the-rich debate these days is focused on the Bush tax cuts. But there’s another fiercely contested battle over taxing the wealthy that’s raging in Washington. It aims to create a new state income tax for those earning $200,000 or more.</p>
<p>It’s unclear how the measure will fare on the Nov. 2 vote. But one man seems to be noticably absent from the debate: Bill Gates.</p>
<p>Bill’s dad, Bill Gates Sr., helped launch the ballot initiative, known as I-1098. He has also contributed $500,000 to the political campaign to get it approved. A person close to the younger Gates says he will, in fact, vote in favor of 1098, but his position has not been made public.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/09/21/will-bill-gates-support-new-income-tax-for-wealthy/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&#038;mod=">Read the rest of this post on the original site</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100922/will-bill-gates-support-new-income-tax-for-wealthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A "Do Not Call The FTC About Facebook Privacy" Registry? Great Idea, Tim.</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20100510/a-do-not-call-the-ftc-about-facebook-privacy-registry-great-idea-tim/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20100510/a-do-not-call-the-ftc-about-facebook-privacy-registry-great-idea-tim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 17:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do Not Call Registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Privacy Information Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miles W. Kirkpatrick Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O’Melveny & Myers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[setting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Muris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=40168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfect. Facebook has enlisted a former senior Bush administration regulator to defend its privacy practices in Washington. Tim Muris, who served as chairman of the Federal Trade Commission from 2001 to 2004 and created the popular U.S. Do Not Call Registry, is advising the company, whose privacy disclosures and fast and loose handling of user data are increasingly drawing scrutiny on Capitol Hill.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;We understand you may not want everyone in the world to have the information you share on Facebook; that is why we give you control of your information. Our default privacy settings limit the information displayed in your profile to your school, your specified local area, and other reasonable community limitations that we tell you about.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20060406105119/http://www.facebook.com/policy.php">Facebook Privacy Policy, 2006</a></p>
<p>&#8220;When you connect with an application or website it will have access to General Information about you. The term General Information includes your and your friends’ names, profile pictures, gender, user IDs, connections, and any content shared using the Everyone privacy setting&#8230;.The default privacy setting for certain types of information you post on Facebook is set to &#8220;everyone.&#8221;&#8230;Because it takes two to connect, your privacy settings only control who can see the connection on your profile page. If you are uncomfortable with the connection being publicly available, you should consider removing (or not making) the connection.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/policy.php">Facebook Privacy Policy, 2010</a></p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2010/05/fb-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="fb" width="150" height="150" class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-40175" />Perfect.</p>
<p>Facebook has enlisted a former senior Bush administration regulator to <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c1ce050a-5b92-11df-85a3-00144feab49a.html">defend its privacy practices in Washington</a>. Tim Muris, an attorney at law firm O’Melveny &#038; Myers who served as chairman of the Federal Trade Commission from 2001 to 2004, is advising the company, whose privacy disclosures and <a href="http://consumerist.com/2010/05/five-scary-facebook-monsters-just-waiting-to-grab-you.html">fast and loose handling of user data</a> are increasingly drawing scrutiny on Capitol Hill.</p>
<p>Indeed, on May 5, the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a <a href="http://epic.org/2010/05/new-facebook-privacy-complaint.html">complaint</a> with the FTC alleging that Facebook has engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices in violation of consumer protection law. </p>
<p>&#8220;[The site] continues to manipulate the privacy settings of users and its own privacy policy so that it can take personal information provided by users and make it widely available for commercial purposes,&#8221; the Washington-based advocacy group said. &#8220;The company has done this repeatedly and users are becoming increasingly frustrated and angry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clearly, the Facebook privacy backlash, which has been building for years now, has begun in earnest. </p>
<p>What better time, then, to seek the help of someone like Muris, who created the popular U.S. Do Not Call Registry and just last week <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2010/05/kirkpatrick.shtm">received the Miles W. Kirkpatrick Award</a> &#8220;for his significant and lasting contributions to the FTC, antitrust law, and the cause of consumer protection.&#8221;</p>
<p>Reached for comment, Facebook said Muris is not an official employee. &#8220;There have been some reports that Tim Muris has joined Facebook,&#8221; the company told me. &#8220;Muris has not joined Facebook.&#8221;</p>
<p>But he is serving as a consultant, something sources close to the company have told me, though Facebook declined to comment on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20100510/a-do-not-call-the-ftc-about-facebook-privacy-registry-great-idea-tim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macworld ’09: iWork '09, iWork.com</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20090106/macworld-iwork-09/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20090106/macworld-iwork-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Paczkowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic outlining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formulas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iWork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iWork.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Paczkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynote Remote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail merge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[object zoom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Schiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spreadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swing transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Table Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[templates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word processing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/?p=10690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Number two on Phil Schiller's list of three announcements: iWork &#8217;09. The next iteration of Keynote, Apple's presentation application, offers some new object transition features: object zoom, a swing transition (Schiller demos it with a Bush-to-Obama slide that gets a laugh from the audience). There are also some new text transitions and chart animations. Finally, Apple's offering a Keynote Remote application. It's an iPhone app, of course.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number two on Phil Schiller&#8217;s list of three announcements: iWork &rsquo;09. The next iteration of Keynote, Apple&#8217;s presentation application, offers some new object transition features: object zoom, a swing transition (Schiller demos it with a Bush-to-Obama slide that gets a laugh from the audience). There are also some new text transitions and chart animations. Finally, Apple&#8217;s offering a Keynote Remote application. It&#8217;s an iPhone app, of course. Cost: 99 cents.</p>
<p>Pages, Apple&#8217;s word processing application, is also getting a bit of an update. Pages &rsquo;09 offers a full-screen view for the easily distracted writer, dynamic outlining, mail merge with Numbers&#8211;Apple&#8217;s spreadsheet program&#8211;and 40 new templates. Not the most exciting stuff, here, but decent additions nonetheless.</p>
<p>In Numbers, Apple (AAPL) has added some new categorization features&#8211;Table Categories, and, answering user requests, some 250 new formulas and functions. New charts, trend lines and other advance reporting options as well.</p>
<p>iWork is also migrating from the desktop to the cloud&#8211;in a sense. Via iWork.com, users can easily upload documents and share them with collaborators. Docs are viewable online. They can be downloaded. And collaborators can comment on them online. iWork.com is cross-platform (Mac and PC) and cross-browser. The online suite looks very much like the Mac-based suite.</p>
<p>iWork will run you $79, $49 if you purchase a new Mac. &#8220;This is the beginning of a new service,&#8221; Schiller noted, adding that it&#8217;s a beta and launches today, solo and as part of a $169 box set that includes iLife and Leopard.</p>
<p>

<!-- WP-SmugMug Plugin: http://tow.com/projects/wordpress/ -->

<div class='wp-smugmug'>

<h4>MacWorld 2009 Keynote Photos</h4>

<ul class="thumbwrap"><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061022-336362/450119335_4z8KZ-L-1.jpg" title="A list of the key features in the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061022-336362/450119335_4z8KZ-Th-1.jpg" alt="A list of the key features in the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro." /></span><span class="caption">A list of the key features in the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro.</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061010-556354/450108949_p8fg7-L-1.jpg" title="Phil in front of the MacBook and the 15&quot; MacBook Pro" rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061010-556354/450108949_p8fg7-Th-1.jpg" alt="Phil in front of the MacBook and the 15&quot; MacBook Pro" /></span><span class="caption">Phil in front of the MacBook and the 15&quot; MacBook Pro</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061011-396356/450108856_bE87f-L-1.jpg" title="Phil lists a series of quotes from journalists, including AllThingsD.com's very own Walt Mossberg." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061011-396356/450108856_bE87f-Th-1.jpg" alt="Phil lists a series of quotes from journalists, including AllThingsD.com's very own Walt Mossberg." /></span><span class="caption">Phil lists a series of quotes from journalists, including AllThingsD.com&#8217;s very own Walt Mossberg.</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061011-346355/450108776_eCWNy-L-1.jpg" title="Walt Mossberg's quote about the new MacBook." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061011-346355/450108776_eCWNy-Th-1.jpg" alt="Walt Mossberg's quote about the new MacBook." /></span><span class="caption">Walt Mossberg&#8217;s quote about the new MacBook.</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061010-396353/450108692_GSqtj-L-1.jpg" title="17&quot; MacBook Pro" rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061010-396353/450108692_GSqtj-Th-1.jpg" alt="17&quot; MacBook Pro" /></span><span class="caption">17&quot; MacBook Pro</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061012-466359/450108613_eqzJv-L-1.jpg" title="Phil Schiller announcing the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061012-466359/450108613_eqzJv-Th-1.jpg" alt="Phil Schiller announcing the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro." /></span><span class="caption">Phil Schiller announcing the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro.</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061013-196361/450108477_LqvXa-L-1.jpg" title="For design professionals, there's a new Anti-Glare Option for the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061013-196361/450108477_LqvXa-Th-1.jpg" alt="For design professionals, there's a new Anti-Glare Option for the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro." /></span><span class="caption">For design professionals, there&#8217;s a new Anti-Glare Option for the new 17&quot; MacBook Pro.</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061005-256348/450106327_vzP63-L-1.jpg" title="Inviting others to work on an iWork document." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061005-256348/450106327_vzP63-Th-1.jpg" alt="Inviting others to work on an iWork document." /></span><span class="caption">Inviting others to work on an iWork document.</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061008-506350/450106192_Ju8gh-L-1.jpg" title="The iWork.com documents look just like iWork, but in a web browser." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061008-506350/450106192_Ju8gh-Th-1.jpg" alt="The iWork.com documents look just like iWork, but in a web browser." /></span><span class="caption">The iWork.com documents look just like iWork, but in a web browser.</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061008-556351/450105976_36uBU-L-1.jpg" title="2009-01-06_1008-55_6351.jpg" rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061008-556351/450105976_36uBU-Th-1.jpg" alt="2009-01-06_1008-55_6351.jpg" /></span><span class="caption">2009-01-06_1008-55_6351.jpg</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061009-136352/450105845_JBs89-L-1.jpg" title="2009-01-06_1009-13_6352.jpg" rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061009-136352/450105845_JBs89-Th-1.jpg" alt="2009-01-06_1009-13_6352.jpg" /></span><span class="caption">2009-01-06_1009-13_6352.jpg</span></a></div></li><li><div><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061002-406339/450104348_5mTvm-L-1.jpg" title="Pricing plans for iLife, iWork, and Mac OS X Leopard." rel="lightbox[wp-smugmug-10690]" class="lightbox fancybox"><span class="wrimg"><span></span><img src="http://d.smugmug.com/Events/Apple/MacWorld-2009/2009-01-061002-406339/450104348_5mTvm-Th-1.jpg" alt="Pricing plans for iLife, iWork, and Mac OS X Leopard." /></span><span class="caption">Pricing plans for iLife, iWork, and Mac OS X Leopard.</span></a></div></li></ul><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://d.smugmug.com/gallery/7023326_Qw82TQ/">View photos at SmugMug</a></p><div style="clear: both;"></div></div><div style="clear: both;"></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20090106/macworld-iwork-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: House Approves Solar Tax Credit Extension, but Not Senate Version; Bush Veto Threat Looms</title>
		<link>http://allthingsd.com/20080926/update-houses-approves-solar-tax-credit-extension-but-not-the-senate-version-bush-veto-threat-looms/</link>
		<comments>http://allthingsd.com/20080926/update-houses-approves-solar-tax-credit-extension-but-not-the-senate-version-bush-veto-threat-looms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Savitz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barrons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Savitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.R. 7060]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act of 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar tax credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech Trader Daily]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voices.allthingsd.com/?p=4356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House voted 257-to-166 today to pass H.R. 7060, the "Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act of 2008," a measure that includes an eight-year extension for solar tax credits. But the measure differs in key ways from the Senate version of the bill approved earlier this week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House voted 257-to-166 today to pass H.R. 7060, the &#8220;Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act of 2008,&#8221; a measure that includes an eight-year extension for solar tax credits. But the measure differs in key ways from the Senate version of the bill approved earlier this week. As Bloomberg notes, that puts the extension of the credits in jeopardy, since the White House has threatened to veto the House version of the bill, which includes some provisions the Administration doesn&#8217;t want.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2008/09/26/update-houses-approves-solar-tax-credit-extension-but-not-the-senate-version-bush-veto-threat-looms/">Read the rest of this post</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthingsd.com/20080926/update-houses-approves-solar-tax-credit-extension-but-not-the-senate-version-bush-veto-threat-looms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

